查看单个帖子
CFA
[中级会员]
ID: 2500
CFA 的头像
CFA 是普普通通的会员
声望: 0 声望力: 0
帖子: 289
家族:
来自:
金钱: 3,060
注册: 2002-08-06

引用:
最初由 丫丫 发布

For me, the reason I choose variable rate is that I believe even the prime rate reached higher than 5%, the 5 year interest cost is still less than a fixed 4.?% 5 year plan.
You are absolutely right.Because the yield curve is not flat and the mortgage loan is amortized, the breakeven point should be beyond the 5-yr fixed rate.
Definitely, VRMs are now cheaper than FRMs and I believe the rates will remain low for a while. As such, VRM may be a better choice, but only temporarily.However,in long run, especially after the teaser period and if the rates hike up, VRM may end up causing you more than FRM.
Personally,I took a 5-yr fixed mortgage for the peace of mind. There is no free lunch.Everything has a price. I think the bottom line is to balance your budget,i.e., match your assets with your liabilities.I know most VRMs have a clause allowing you to convert your VRM into FRM(to lock in).So for those who choose VRM,just keep an eye on the rates.
CFA 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 2004-04-24, 11:11 #11