首页 | 中文黄页 | 2008卡拉OK大赛

渥太华华人网上社区
注册账号 Blog 论坛帮助 会员列表 搜索 今日新帖 标记版面已读 用户相册
返回   CFC加拿大中文论坛 > 加国生活 > 渥太华华人论坛 > China oil and gas
回复
 
主题工具 显示模式
[中级会员]
ID: 8948
GoneWithTheWind 的头像
GoneWithTheWind 是普普通通的会员
声望: 0 声望力: 0
帖子: 425
家族:
来自:
金钱: 2,670
注册: 2003-06-24
China oil and gas

Here is how international media comments on China's failure of oil/gas strategy.

================================================================
FT.com
Lex: China oil and gas
Wednesday October 8, 4:45 pm ET


China's bid to secure overseas oil assets is looking sickly. Its acquisition spree is littered with failures, especially in strategic Kazakhstan. The international oil majors, which took supportive stakes when China listed its trio - PetroChina, Sinopec and CNOOC - are getting twitchy about the dearth of quid pro quos. Nor have the Chinese companies benefited from any favours from those partnerships. The majors have worked to block Chinese interests from entering projects, most seriously in the case of the potentially vast Kashagan field in Kazakhstan.
Can China still achieve its expansion ambitions? The three listed entities certainly have the cash: around $9bn in aggregate. Beijing has given them the mandate to go out and spend it. While government ownership is a handicap to international expansion (the listed arms only constitute a small part of the whole), Malaysia's Petronas shows it need not be a deterrent.

Although China's demand for oil is voracious - a dizzying 5.6m barrels a day, 2m of which is imported - and there are security advantages in owning oil reserves, it should be wary of buying into projects for the sake of it. Some projects, particularly in Indonesia where the government makes a big tax grab, can be poor investments. Greenfield projects are also out. China lacks the management resources and operating expertise. A consortium approach, with Asian partners, is one way of developing assets. Offering market access in return for stakes is another way forward. But China will have to move quickly to stay in the game.

Philips Electronics would struggle to claim that superior operating skills have driven its 28 per cent outperformance of General Electric over the last decade. But the Dutch conglomerate can point to a strong record in trading businesses. For example, it sold down stakes in JDS Uniphase, the optical components group, and semiconductor equipment maker ASML when they were still riding high during the technology boom, instead strengthening its more solid medical systems business.

Yesterday's decision to offload a chunk of Taiwan Semiconductor also looks shrewd. The shares have risen by 76 per cent since the beginning of the year as hopes of a rebound have gathered pace. Philips' 21.5 per cent stake in TSMC now accounts for about one quarter of its own market capitalisation - uncomfortably high for a business it does not control. Reducing its stake to 19.1 per cent will raise about EU1bn, locking in some profits from the semiconductor rebound, which still needs to be underpinned by further chip price rises. Philips' decision to convert the TSMC shares first into American depository shares also allows it to take advantage of their 15 per cent premium to the Taiwan-traded shares.
GoneWithTheWind 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 2003-10-09, 11:59 #1
[┳??初级会员??┳]
ID: 146
人在天涯 的头像
人在天涯 是普普通通的会员
声望: 0 声望力: 0
帖子: 17,301
家族:
来自:
金钱: 2,706
注册: 2002-01-23

现在好像要卡中国的脖子越来越容易了
人在天涯 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 2003-10-09, 12:06 #2
[青铜长老]
ID: 350
chengchy 的头像
chengchy 是普普通通的会员
声望: 0 声望力: 0
帖子: 1,245
家族:
来自:
金钱: 2,680
注册: 2002-02-14

问题就在这里,世界可以不需要中国的产品,中国不能不需要世界的石油。可惜中国还有无数的人吸收着“中国是地大物博的国家”的谬论。
中国地大则大已,“物博”则纯粹是胡说八道。
chengchy 当前离线  
回复时引用此帖
旧 2003-10-09, 12:38 #3
回复


主题工具
显示模式




所有时间均为格林尼治时间 -4。现在的时间是 05:05

论坛内容均为网友自由上传, 不代表本网观点。
comefromchina.com does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.


Powered by vBulletin® 版本 3.6.8
版权所有 ©2000 - 2008,Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright @ comefromchina.com 2007

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.