[会游泳的鱼]

两组事故，断裂方法完全一样。大家为了自己的安全着想，不要购买日本车了。底盘感觉像是纸糊的一样。里边的人死定了！！！

第一组

[会游泳的鱼]

第二组图片。杭州上塘高架车祸_本田车变两段
这辆是娶亲的婚车，开车的是一个19岁的小伙子，车内还做了一个19岁的MM，和一个20岁的小伙子。
据说是为了避让一只狗，司机猛打方向，冲上隔离带所致。
顶棚薄得像纸！底盘像泡沫塑料！




加价才能买到的神车,怎么好像被切开的？断口算是整齐，而且车漆还很好的样子哦，搞不懂

车体太单薄，哪有随即就被挂住撕断的呢？玩具车还不是这个水平啊！

本田车撞隔离带（20CM高）就断了，真差劲。
实在想不通，底盘的钢架怎么也会断开，有那么大的冲击力吗，看上去象石膏做的一样。

日本车也太不牢了，看过的车祸严重的不计其数，这样的情况，真是没有见到过！

“高速行使的车辆，右前轮轮胎突然爆裂，司机猛踩刹车，导致车辆翻滚，撞到防护栏后右侧车中部被挂住，由于车前部质量大惯性大，继续翻滚将车体撕裂。（这是我通过照片分析得出的结论）这一事故的原因有三个：一是爆胎，可能是保养问题，也可能是偶然；二是司机处理不当，爆胎后不能猛刹；三是车体太单薄，哪有随即就被挂住撕断的呢？玩具车还不是这个水平啊！ ”

就这样时速不到70的小事故,竟然一死四伤，目前四重伤者生死未明！

据业内人士说，本田（多数日本车都是这样）的底盘有质量问题，在高速行驶下脆弱的像一张纸！

[流浪无限]

不轻点根本难以省油。车体钢板做的厚重，也必然减少内部空间的大小。总的来说，你的要求都违反了日本车现在优势的卖点。呵呵，行不通的！

[Diver]

纸糊的

[泛蓝]

真恐怖

[iambenben]

广本完了，不好卖了，呵呵
不过帕萨特也有从车头整个断裂的事故

[punkren]

撞这么狠,开什么车都活不了

你要是不出车祸,开什么车都安全

和日本车有啥关系

[bigcooler]

好几天前就贴过了
http://www.comefromchina.com/newbbs/...t=%B1%BE%CC%EF


另外下图是帕赛特passat

[Diver]

我猜那50米他可能是在加油门，手里有那么多碰撞实验，他想知道倭车是不是真的那么不抗撞。

[会游泳的鱼]

嗬嗬，头部断裂和中间断裂当然有区别，人在没有钢铁壳子的保护下，高速运动状态十分脆弱。而汽车头部断裂，大问题还是没有的。我的结论就是：日本车的安全性能确实比较差，希望大家尽量不要购买！！！！

[bigcooler]

上图passat算中部断裂了，司机座椅连同一部分底部钢板跟车头跑了。
BENZ

[Gay]

买车只买中国日本韩国的车.

[北极光]

人为炒作广州本田，今天已经显现恶果。

近几年国内汽车市场火爆，其中广本最为耀眼。但后期开始出现人为炒作现象。广本轿车增经一度在市场价的基础上加价销售，每台甚至加价几万，人为炒作，吸引客户，很多客户交钱后很长时间拿不到车，甚至受骗上当。更不用提订车的客户要等很长时间。这种现象误导消费者，误导市场，也可能误导厂家和其它方面。这两起事故在制造质量方面可能导致的原因有二：
1.厂家受到误导，盲目提高产量，忽略质量控制（车用高强度薄钢板材料的控制，白车身焊接过程控制）。
2.市场受到误导，则引导和启发造假者（在国外偷运或走私割断汽车，在珠三角地带农村合体恢复）。

上述第一种的可能性极小。第二种的可能性较大。不过事情的澄清并不难，发动机号和车体号码是最好的证据。厂家和销售单位都应有详细的记载。

承载式车身由几十块主要冲压件和其它连接件合体焊接而成，其设计结构合理，节省空间和材料，安全性能完全可以达到国际标准并且伴随轿车生产几十年。但如果不按照标准制造，由于车体在运动中直接承受底盘传递的复杂扭力，在较大冲击力尤其是制动和横向撞击综合作用下极有可能在薄弱部分断裂撕开。

[onebuck]

I agree for the most part. Those accidents were much more severe and worse than anything that I have seen either in person on in the media. Completely unthinkable, actually. BUT, were they caused by vehicle-vehicle collision, and if so, what heppened to the other vehicles?

People tend to say that Japanese cars are not safe enough, and I think that is an unfair statement. Note that I am definitely not a champion of JP cars. But much testing has been done and the conclusion really does not single out JP cars the (only) unsafe ones (and let's not forget that there are many makes of JP cars). Among others, Koreans and Germans also make unsafe cars. So, what I am trying to say is that we should not be too general in making a statement that JP cars are unsafe. No one has said the same thing about Lexus or Acura, right?

To be safe, we should at least drive defensively.

最初由 punkren 发布
撞这么狠,开什么车都活不了

你要是不出车祸,开什么车都安全

和日本车有啥关系

[Gay]

最初由 onebuck 发布
I agree for the most part. Those accidents were much more severe and worse than anything that I have seen either in person on in the media. Completely unthinkable, actually. BUT, were they caused by vehicle-vehicle collision, and if so, what heppened to the other vehicles?

People tend to say that Japanese cars are not safe enough, and I think that is an unfair statement. Note that I am definitely not a champion of JP cars. But much testing has been done and the conclusion really does not single out JP cars the (only) unsafe ones (and let's not forget that there are many makes of JP cars). Among others, Koreans and Germans also make unsafe cars. So, what I am trying to say is that we should not be too general in making a statement that JP cars are unsafe. No one has said the same thing about Lexus or Acura, right?

To be safe, we should at least drive defensively.

赞成.