|
|
||||||||||||||
![]() 渥太华华人网上社区 |
|
| 注册账号 | Blog | 论坛帮助 | 会员列表 | 搜索 | 今日新帖 | 标记版面已读 | 用户相册 |
![]() |
> 加拿大政府(人)真是傻得可爱 |
![]() |
|
|
主题工具 | 显示模式 |
|
[资深会员]
ID: 9013
|
引用:
If you were an Indian, you probably will have problem with this. If you are a proud Canadian like I am, your leaning should be otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
[资深会员]
ID: 9013
|
引用:
But not the above two sentences you quoted. They are absolutely right and you better accept them. |
|
|
|
|
[封禁用户]
ID: 44372
|
引用:
You are so selfish.... |
|
|
|
|
[封禁用户]
ID: 44372
|
引用:
Is Xiaomimi a chinese doctor ?? otherwise, what qualified her to say that?? if she is not a doctor then she is simply an ignorant, arrogant fool. |
|
|
|
|
[开坛元勋]
ID: 161
|
You DO have a good sense of humor.
![]() Unlike some of the people here, you don't force your own opinion onto others, and when unsuccessful, you can actually retain your composure. 引用:
|
|
|
|
|
[资深会员]
ID: 3033
|
加拿大贸然加入京都协议确实是欠考虑,理由如下:
1。 大气环境是人类共享的。所以就应该人类共同努力来改善它。打个比方,你为 了建少空气污染,决定不再用火炉而改用昂贵的电炉了。可你的人口比你多十倍的 邻居(美国)却仍然烧火炉,你用什么办法能保证你头上的这片纯净空气能够永远停 留在你的头上而不被美国漂过来的空气污染?所以,加国的努力基本上是作无用功, 但大笔的金钱却要无止境地投入。 2。京都协议主要是基于某些环境科学家们假设的暖房效因对地球环境的影响。可是, 就拿加拿大来说:你觉得今年加国的冬天变暖了吗?现在正有越来越多的科学家对 暖房效因提出质疑,很多科学文献已经指出:地球的周期性变暖再变冷是一个大的 循环周期,基本由地球地貌的变迁和太阳幅射有关,而现代人类的二氧化碳排放造 成的气候变暖只占了整个地球的周期性变暖因素的1%。 |
|
|
|
[开坛元勋]
ID: 208
|
气候变化并不是那么简单, 当大气层中有了更多能量后, 狂风暴雨台风大雪都会显著增加, 气温也会变得更极端, 冬天更冷,夏天更热.
|
|
________________________________
电话: 580-2460 482-2401 688-8182 321-7007 800-667-0123
WF: 72.5/22 0303220846 71.6/21 1221 9.0/46 9.0/55 73.8/24 03230700 |
|
|
|
|
[资深会员]
ID: 9013
|
引用:
For example, I don't have a very strong opinion on Kyoto, so I can go easy here. On the other hand, I DO have a big problem with Chinese "medicine". I absolutely can not afford any humor over there. |
|
|
|
|
[中级会员]
ID: 44064
|
引用:
如果光是对主子自嚎,祈祷别的国家遭殃,把中国的传统说成垃圾,实在令人做呕,如果是幽默也是呕吐的幽默。 |
|
|
|
|
[青铜长老]
ID: 6098
|
Bit by bit, we have been destroying earth, have we not? We’ve been dumping radioactive nuclear waste in our oceans. We produce chemicals and burry hazardous waste under the ground and release poisonous gases in our air. We have been depleting forests. We have feeding cows beef products.
Our food contaminated, our water and air polluted and our cows mad. We have to do something to stop the destruction. Kyoto is one of the something. Why opposing it? |
|
|
|
[黄金长老]
ID: 40272
|
引用:
至于你的比方,你可以喊上其他几个志同道合的邻居,三天两头游说用火炉的邻居。把他烦死还不行吗?
|
|
|
|
|
[青铜长老]
ID: 5683
|
引用:
|
|
|
|
|
[资深会员]
ID: 3033
|
引用:
但不用火炉而改用电炉却要花费你的金钱。 而参加京都协定更是要花大大的金钱,而且花了这笔钱你却享受不到真正的环境改 善。如果在当前能把这笔金钱用在更实用的地方,比如投资在温室效因的科研上, 或投资在其他直接可受益的环保项目上,才是明智的选择。 |
|
|
|