A letter to Trudeau and Liberals

comets

新手上路
注册
2015-11-17
消息
23
荣誉分数
0
声望点数
1
A letter to Trudeau and the Liberals: Yourself and every Liberal MP and senator should open your doors to host refugees.

Sir,

This is your charity show that the majority of Canadians have said "NO". But you chose to NOT to listen. You fool us like a three-year old. We all have hearts and sympathies. However we don't want to swallow the crap that's put into our mouth. Our Healthcare system is falling apart. It takes us at least months to see a specialist and how long to have an operation? With the extra refugees, the wait time will only be longer. I guess you don't have to wait. Do you care the least???

Everyone knows we're NOT ready for the 25000. But you do it anyway just to save your pride. No, you're NOT helping the refugees but to harm them. Because they won't be welcomed. You are creating anger and hatred by your arrogance. You have no idea how many who voted Liberals have regretted and how many turned to Conservatives in recent weeks.

Don't bother asking citizens to provide housing to the refugees. Yourself and every Liberal MP and senator should show leadership by setting an example. You should open your doors to host refugees if you expect us to welcome them. The same goes to the provincial and municipal. Otherwise, DON'T BRING THEM!!!
 
这种信写得好意思发,往狠里说都成仇恨信件了。。。。。恕我直言啦
 
又被代表了。
 
让小土豆先照顾下现有居民的问题吧。
1/3劳动者收入在最低工资附近,加上失业的,40%多的劳动者属于低收人。
除去联邦省市三级政府,直接间接吃皇粮的,私企能提供多少中高收入职位?
 
让小土豆先照顾下现有居民的问题吧。
1/3劳动者收入在最低工资附近,加上失业的,40%多的劳动者属于低收人。
除去联邦省市三级政府,直接间接吃皇粮的,私企能提供多少中高收入职位?
真跟希腊出事前有点儿像了。
 
上次一封信出自新华社前记者,这次这信出自谁手笔?华人的写作都这么绝对化强烈情绪化非理性化呀。别的不多讲,把everyone去掉再发吧。
其实,新华社记者或者这封信作者写完后,请个华人高中生修改一下就会好很多。
 
一些年轻力壮的人,什么都不做,每月有近2000元收入,有老婆孩子的。谁会去每天工作8小时,每周工作40小时的去挣最低工资? 钱还是小事。就这些年轻力壮的人整天不工作,能干嘛呢,会去干嘛呢,这个比较让人担心。
传教啊,他们在芬兰就那么做。
 
干嘛不署自己名?
“majority of Canadians have said "NO". 有统计数据为依据吗,还是你自己主观臆想?或根据你周围的人的观点?别忘了,加拿大可有3千万人口。
还是把文中的We改成I, 署上名。“你只能代表你自己”。每人心里都有数, 转不转是别人的事。
 
干嘛不署自己名?
“majority of Canadians have said "NO". 有统计数据为依据吗,还是你自己主观臆想?
这是有数据的。如果我没记错,已被国防部长证实。
 
”华人的写作都这么绝对化强烈情绪化非理性化”, 你读过几篇华人的写作?你能否给写一个不绝对不情绪强烈的信?
特指这里发表的两封公开信呀。读过高中生写的英文,理性逻辑文法相当不错的。公开信的目的是要别人理解甚至接受你写的,对吧?
 
补充一句,不反对公开信,民主国家公民有义务有权利关心公众利益发表个人观点的,但是,为了效果好一点,请自己孩子或者邻居孩子高中生修改一下,会好很多。
 
后退
顶部