要动政府工退休金这块蛋糕了

你歪脖哥哥去意大利了, 春节后回来.:(

去意大利那么长时间?不是去游轮上兼职了吧?你要是无事,给大伙报个平安吧。上次村长失踪数日,没打招呼,俺觉得TA会回来的。这次歪脖写的是绝笔!:crying:

那谁谁说的QQH,可能是善意的谎言!
 
去意大利那么长时间?不是去游轮上兼职了吧?你要是无事,给大伙报个平安吧。上次村长失踪数日,没打招呼,俺觉得TA会回来的。这次歪脖写的是绝笔!:crying:

那谁谁说的QQH,可能是善意的谎言!

加妈, 别哭, 人肯定是活着的, 有QQH为证啊.:p :blowzy:
 
真的假的?谁都靠不住啊!
 
有没有确切的消息来源?
 
有没有确切的消息来源?
http://www.cfra.com/?cat=1&nid=83838

PSAC Worries About Pensions
Josh Pringle
Wednesday, January 18, 2012

The largest Federal union in Ottawa is telling Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to keep his "hands off our pensions."

Flaherty has hinted his spring budget could include reforms to public sector pensions.

But the Public Service Alliance of Canada says the Federal Government should not reduce the deficit on the backs of public service workers.

PSAC President John Gordon says Flaherty has promised him that if public servants committed to paying 40 per cent of the yearly contribution rates for their pensions, the government wouldn't be looking for more savings from the plan.

PSAC recommends the government should strengthen retirement security for all rather than weaken public service pensions.
 
这样的话,得重新考虑养老问题啦。
 
有没有确切的消息来源?



今天广播了又在讨论MP的养老金,说MP自己每放一块钱在养老金里,政府就要Match 6块,还要保证10%的年增长率,实际等同MP放一块钱,政府match 23 块,我的妈呀,真是肥差,咱们CFC也争取选一个MP吧,分享一下。
 
http://www.cfra.com/?cat=1&nid=83838



PSAC Worries About Pensions

Josh Pringle

Wednesday, January 18, 2012



The largest Federal union in Ottawa is telling Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to keep his "hands off our pensions."



Flaherty has hinted his spring budget could include reforms to public sector pensions.



But the Public Service Alliance of Canada says the Federal Government should not reduce the deficit on the backs of public service workers.



PSAC President John Gordon says Flaherty has promised him that if public servants committed to paying 40 per cent of the yearly contribution rates for their pensions, the government wouldn't be looking for more savings from the plan.



PSAC recommends the government should strengthen retirement security for all rather than weaken public service pensions.





为啥只保护 Public sector 人的权益,private Sector那? 养人的人没有权益保障,被养的人确是振振有词。
 
后退
顶部