圣经中有关人祭的经文
撒母耳下中,清楚记载了一次七人祭,目的过程结果完整
A.人祭的目的:大卫年间有饥荒,一连三年。耶和华说:这饥荒是因扫罗和他流人血之家,杀死基遍人(21:1)
B.人祭的过程:基遍人就把他们在耶和华面前,悬挂在山上,这七人就一同死亡(21:9)。
C.人祭的结果:此后神垂听国民所求的(21:14)。
FR不知道在哪里抄来的滥竽,却要拿来冒充原装
圣经鼓励杀人献祭?
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_68521099010150sf.html
圣经中有关人祭的经文
撒母耳下中,清楚记载了一次七人祭,目的过程结果完整
A.人祭的目的:大卫年间有饥荒,一连三年。耶和华说:这饥荒是因扫罗和他流人血之家,杀死基遍人(21:1)
B.人祭的过程:基遍人就把他们在耶和华面前,悬挂在山上,这七人就一同死亡(21:9)。
C.人祭的结果:此后神垂听国民所求的(21:14)。
是的,该准备回家了。周末愉快。
其实如果不是神汉神婆跑出他们的神屋到处cut/paste地胡扯,真没兴趣和神汉神婆玩这些。
FR不知道在哪里抄来的滥竽,却要来冒充原装。这个东东,我老早以前就写过一段博文驳斥过了。
圣经鼓励人祭?
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_68521099010150sf.html
哥们,还是算了吧。道理是和正常的人讲的。和几个已经走火入魔的宗教极端分子,咱们已经浪费了一下午时间了,没啥意思了。
花一个周末,找点还没有被驳倒的新鲜货出来怎么样?![]()
至少我没有诅咒基督徒个人. 基督教诅咒非信徒下地狱受难, 95%中国人可是要下地狱的.
《圣经》的核心是“爱”。
看到了有些“有心人”出于偏见,用鸡蛋里挑骨头的心态对《圣经》截头去尾加以曲解,直到得出他们想要的结论。
Einstein’s “I don’t believe in God”
爱恩思坦的信(原件)
The key passages of the letter reads like this (translated from German):
... I read a great deal in the last days of your book, and thank you very much for sending it to me. What especially struck me about it was this. With regard to the factual attitude to life and to the human community we have a great deal in common.
... The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. These subtilised interpretations are highly manifold according to their nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes, they are also no better than other human groups, although they are protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot see anything 'chosen' about them.
In general I find it painful that you claim a privileged position and try to defend it by two walls of pride, an external one as a man and an internal one as a Jew. As a man you claim, so to speak, a dispensation from causality otherwise accepted, as a Jew the privilege of monotheism. But a limited causality is no longer a causality at all, as our wonderful Spinoza recognized with all incision, probably as the first one. And the animistic interpretations of the religions of nature are in principle not annulled by monopolization. With such walls we can only attain a certain self-deception, but our moral efforts are not furthered by them. On the contrary.
Now that I have quite openly stated our differences in intellectual convictions it is still clear to me that we are quite close to each other in essential things, i.e; in our evaluations of human behavior. What separates us are only intellectual 'props' and 'rationalization' in Freud's language. Therefore I think that we would understand each other quite well if we talked about concrete things.
With friendly thanks and best wishes,
Yours, A. Einstein
okay, that's it. gotta pack up and go now. have a good weekend! atheists, Buddhists, Islamist, Christians, or whatever you are.