“国际权威机构”真的“确证”过转基因食品是安全的吗?

reine02

资深人士
VIP
注册
2012-02-27
消息
9,438
荣誉分数
2,120
声望点数
273
查了好几天资料也没有查到。意外的是,最近美国有不少有关食品的诉讼官司直指食品管理机构对食品种类(天然,有机等)的定义模糊。 还有一些发表在peer reviewed的科技期刊上的论文质疑和反对食品管理机构对转基因食品安全性的认识。

FDA官网上说他们不做转基因食品的安全性验证,关于转基因作物是否安全,要转基因公司来负责。 而关于转基因食品是否安全,FDA说的是:不管你信不信,反正我是信了(We believe):转基因作物不比传统作物更不安全....



Serious unintended effects in bees from GM dsRNA

A new study shows major unexpected effects in bees from dietary GM dsRNA.

Early this year, a peer-reviewed study was published by Prof Jack Heinemann and colleagues suggesting that government GMO regulators are failing to consider important risks of new kinds of GM plants and co-technologies.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412013000494
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/rss/14920
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/14699
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/14694

These new-type GM plants and products are designed to make a form of genetic information called double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). While most existing GM plants are designed to make new proteins, the new GM plants and products make dsRNA in order to alter the way genes are expressed.

This process of gene expression alteration is called RNAi or RNA interference, or post-transcriptional gene silencing.

Research has shown that dsRNAs can transfer from plants to humans and other animals through food.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21931358

The Australia/New Zealand GMO regulator FSANZ dismissed Heinemann and colleagues' study, using spurious reassurances about dsRNA risks.
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/rss/14920

The Science Media Centre of New Zealand joined in the chorus to silence concerns raised by the study.
http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/14703

Now a new study in honey bees shows that Heinemann and colleagues were right to warn about the unintended effects of dsRNA-type products.

The new study revealed that the expression of nearly 1,400 of the bees' genes was altered in response to a certain type of dsRNA administered in their food - representing around 10% of known honey bee genes.
http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/4/1/90/pdf

Interestingly, this particular dsRNA has been used as a control dsRNA in honey bee experiments, since its gene sequence does not exist in honey bees and thus it was not expected to trigger RNAi responses in the bees.
http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/4/1/90/pdf

It seems this was yet another assumption about GMO safety that has been proven wrong by further scientific research.

The authors of the new study noted: "Expression changes appear to be the result of both direct off-target effects and indirect downstream secondary effects."

Do these effects matter? Apparently, yes. The authors explain: "In general, the affected genes are involved in important developmental and metabolic processes associated with RNA processing and transport, hormone metabolism, immunity, response to external stimulus and to stress."

Another surprise was that only a small number (less than 11) of matches between the dsRNA and non-target gene were enough to cause off-target effect in the bees.

Let's hope the risk-deniers in regulatory agencies read the study and take note.
 
最后编辑:
核老二,国际权威机构,你怎么定义啊?
对我们生活在北美的人来讲,食品安全,FDA算不算权威?
对我们生活在加拿大的人来讲, 加拿大卫生部算不算权威?
(不要拿人们日报来说事,咱们毕竟不在中国大陆买食物每天)
 
核老二,国际权威机构,你怎么定义啊?
对我们生活在北美的人来讲,食品安全,FDA算不算权威?
对我们生活在加拿大的人来讲, 加拿大卫生部算不算权威?
(不要拿人们日报来说事,咱们毕竟不在中国大陆买食物每天)
就按照向左使和9981他们的方教主的定义来吧
 
所谓安全就是权威机构还没有发现问题。 如果以后发现问题, 你已经吃了也是活该。给孟山都当白老鼠,权威机构不赔的
最有说服力的安全性验证,是长期的人体试验。我们耐心等待左使方教主吃上20年转基因食品,再下结论不迟
 
所谓安全就是权威机构还没有发现问题。 如果以后发现问题, 你已经吃了也是活该。给孟山都当白老是,权威机构不赔的
最有说服力的安全性验证,是长期的人体试验。我们耐心等待左使方教主吃上20年转基因食品,再下结论不迟
20年恐怕不够,200年吧
转基因食品商业化已经有十几年历史了吧;)

再说了,你恐怕吃的食物里不少都含转基因成分的,很遗憾吧
 
20年恐怕不够,200年吧
转基因食品商业化已经有十几年历史了吧;)

再说了,你恐怕吃的食物里不少都含转基因成分的,很遗憾吧
一个事实就是20年来美国人的健康越来越差了。
 
20年恐怕不够,200年吧
转基因食品商业化已经有十几年历史了吧;)
再说了,你恐怕吃的食物里不少都含转基因成分的,很遗憾吧

能不吃就不吃。能少吃就少吃。避免不了,吃了也就吃了。
人生不如意者十之八九。遗憾不解决任何问题,改变不了的就坦然接受
 
后退
顶部