嗯,加拿大美女议员为何大骂哈珀等前同党翻脸不认人?

Fisher2004

资深人士
VIP
注册
2004-07-25
消息
33,823
荣誉分数
375
声望点数
243
嗯,加拿大美女议员为何大骂哈珀等前同党翻脸不认人?


-------------------------------------------------
加保守党女参议员 大骂哈珀等前同党翻脸不认人
2013-10-24 07:47 来源: 作者:

参议员瓦琳23日在参议院愤怒控诉哈珀总理及其亲信迫害她。(加通社)

加拿大参议院23日举行的有关参议员瓦琳(pamela Wallin)冒领差旅费问题的听证会,变成了瓦琳控诉哈珀总理夥同其他保守党籍参议员迫害她的诉苦会。

像前一天因类似问题而在参议院内为自己作辩护的前保守党籍参议员杜费和派里卓一样,瓦琳抱怨她受到了她的前同志的残酷政治打击,这一切都是为了保住保守党政府的颜面。

她指责保守党政府和哈珀总理在参议院内的亲信,在过去一年的大部分时间内,「想尽办法在公众眼前羞辱和损害我的名誉┅┅」她继续说∶「他们希望所有这些行动能够迫使我辞职,但尽管有这些清晰、直截了当的意向,你们永远难以破坏我的精神。」

今年夏季,由德勤会计事务所(Deloitte)进行的独立审计,已提出瓦琳应该退回不当领取的12万1000元的差旅支出,此外还有2万1000元的费用要再仔细审核。参议院内部经济委员会研究後判定,在德勤公司认为那有问题的2万1000元中,瓦琳应该再退还1万7622元。

在此情形下,她已在上月退还15万馀元被指冒领的差旅费,但她一直坚持说她是在很不情愿状况下退还的,甚至指责她的参议院同僚对她进行精神性的「私刑」,抱怨参议院对她的差旅费进行的审查「有根本性的缺陷和不公平」。

现在,参议院的内部经济委员会又准备停发她的参议员薪水和暂停她享受的福利,就是在有关此事的听证会上,瓦琳大吐苦水,大骂哈珀等前同党之人出於政治利益,翻脸不认人。

瓦琳说的「哈珀在参议院内的亲信」指的是夏季才辞职的保守党参议院领袖莱布瑞顿及参议院内部经济委员会成员奥尔森。

在瓦琳读完她的声明後,莱布瑞顿立即站起来高声说∶「造谣!造谣!造谣!」

前保守党籍参议员杜费22日在同样的参议院听证会上说,出於维护保守党在选民面前的声誉,哈珀总理亲自命令杜费,不管申领住房津贴是否恰当,他都必须退还所有领取的住房津贴。

在此之前,哈珀无论是对国会、还是对媒体,都坚持说杜费退还冒领的住房津贴之事,由总理办公室幕僚长瑞特(Nigel Wright)一手包办,他一直到看到媒体报导,才知道他的幕僚长瑞特给了杜费9万多元退赔冒领的住房津贴之事。

哈珀23日在国会质询阶段未正面答覆在野党提出的他的数名亲信参与此事的质询,也未谈及杜费指控他发出威胁之事,而是在保守党籍国会议员发出的喧闹声中耸动地大声说∶「杜费先生说他是个受害者,因为我告诉他应该退还他领取的住房津贴。一点没错,我确实告诉他应该退还他的住房津贴。」
 
看看薄熙来二审吧。
 
我觉得哈珀说得很对啊,他都必须退还所有领取的住房津贴。
下次我铁定继续投哈珀票,他比自由党抽大麻的小白脸靠谱多了。
 
我觉得哈珀说得很对啊,他都必须退还所有领取的住房津贴。
下次我铁定继续投哈珀票,他比自由党抽大麻的小白脸靠谱多了。
政客都那样,两害相权取其轻。政府工投lib,私企工投con。:D
lib为拉选票拉拢瘾君子!:eek:
 
见老太太叫美女,鱼四这口味~~~~
 
我也想说,这年头,是母的都叫美女吗?
 
不翻脸还叫政客? 没见过一个政客说话算话的。什么渥太华市长、安省省长;这些东西竞选的时候叫的天花乱缀,当选以后都翻脸。相比下来哈伯真算好的。
 
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...er-100000-in-travel-expenses/article13751365/

How Pamela Wallin claimed more than $100,000 in questionable travel expenses Add to ...
JOSH WINGROVE and KIM MACKRAEL
OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Aug. 13 2013, 10:54 PM EDT
Last updated Wednesday, Aug. 14 2013, 10:45 PM EDT

Senator Pamela Wallin is being asked to repay $121,348 after an independent audit found a series of problems with the former broadcaster’s expense claims – including billing taxpayers for partisan fundraisers.
The release of the audit Tuesday gave new life to the ongoing Senate expenses scandal, including questions about claims made by Ms. Wallin as well as Patrick Brazeau, Mike Duffy and Mac Harb. The four have been asked to repay a combined total of roughly $490,000.
More Related to this Story

The Canadian Press
Video
Video: Stephane Dion says Harper needs to explain Wallin expenses

watch
Video: John Ibbitson: The Senate expenses scandal is Justin Trudeau's problem too

Senator Pamela Wallin delivers a statement to journalists about an audit examining her expenses on Parliament Hill on Aug. 12, 2013.
gallery
In pictures: The four senators under investigation by RCMP

Senator Pamela Wallin says her expenses are being reviewed by an outside auditing firm. The Canadian Press
interactive
How much Pamela Wallin (and other senators) charged in travel expenses

Watch
Video: Giant Mike Duffy balloon lurks in the shadow of Parliament

Watch
Video: Why Tories should fear audit of Senator Pamela Wallin's travel expenses

Conservative Senator Pamela Wallin. REUTERS
watch
Video: John Ibbitson: Why are the RCMP investigating Pamela Wallin?
Ms. Wallin’s case is different than the others, in that it focuses squarely on travel. The audit found Ms. Wallin racked up costs by attending a series of events, and regularly stopping in Toronto while flying between Ottawa, the capital, and Saskatchewan, her home province. It also found she had retroactively altered some of her schedule records as the review was continuing, something she said was done for clarity and to protect privacy.
Ms. Wallin has already repaid $38,369.29 and has pledged to repay whatever she owes, but called the audit process “flawed and unfair.”
Side jobs
The audit found that Ms. Wallin claimed $90,323 in travel for “non-Senate business,” citing 79 examples.
They include at least six partisan activities, such as appearing on a political panel debate during the 2011 election and attending a “Here for Canada PM Rally” during the same campaign, according to the audit. That trip, from April 13 to 23, cost a total of $5,419.68, though auditors are only recommending she be asked to repay $466.16 of that. It’s not clear why. Elections Canada records also show Ms. Wallin headlined a partisan fundraiser for Saskatchewan MP Ray Boughen in Moose Jaw during that trip, though the audit doesn’t mention that event.
Other partisan activities include a $100-a-plate fundraiser during April, 2009, in Saskatoon for four local Conservative riding groups, according to the audit. “This does not appear to be Senate business, as it was a fundraising event,” the auditors said. Ms. Wallin also billed taxpayers for an event honouring former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, which the audit said “appears to be a partisan event.”
The auditors found another partisan event that required “interpretation” under Senate rules – a $119 claim from January, 2011, for a speaking event by Conservative MP Kellie Leitch, who has since been promoted to cabinet, as well as an event titled “Fairchild TV – PMO,” an apparent reference to a Chinese-Canadian television station and the Prime Minister’s Office. The broadcaster aired an interview with Ms. Wallin shortly after, but it’s unclear what the PMO’s involvement was.
Ms. Wallin also appears to have attended events for former MP Bev Oda and Saskatchewan MP Garry Breitkreuz, according to a letter send by her lawyer to the auditors.
In her time as a senator, Ms. Wallin has served on several corporate boards, including Porter Airlines and Calgary-based Oilsands Quest Inc. The latter paid her at least $600,000, according to to its financial filings, and the audit found that some trips to Calgary were paid for by a “third party.”
On five occasions, however, she claimed Senate reimbursement for what auditors deemed “personal” travel or “private business” in Calgary. The costs were billed as Senate business, and Ms. Wallin has since repaid two of the claims, totalling $7,356.40, saying they were made in error.
The auditors also flagged $1,402.59 in expenses for two Porter events, including one 2010 event Ms. Wallin billed as Senate business for a luncheon that the auditors said “appears to be of a personal interest given her role at the time on the board of an airline company.”
She also served as chancellor for the University of Guelph, an unpaid position. The auditors allege she should repay $2,728.35 for a trip billed to her Senate account that appears to have only included a Guelph convocation. She also billed $511.14 to fly to Toronto, where she caught a flight to Punta Cana for a private conference. The auditors found that didn’t count as “Senate business.”
Toronto stopovers
Ms. Wallin represents Saskatchewan and keeps a home there, but owns a condo in Toronto. The audit found that she spends most of her time in that city. As such, she tends to stop there while flying between Ottawa and Saskatchewan.
Auditors included information from 94 flights Ms. Wallin took from the capital to her home province. Of those, 11 were direct and one had a connection. Of the rest, 43 stopped in Toronto for one night, 32 stopped in Toronto for more than one night and seven used other routes. Ms. Wallin told the auditors that she didn’t claim per diems or living allowances for the stopovers, but the auditors demonstrated that the costs piled up – extra cab fares and higher airline fares, as she typically booked each leg of the journey separately.
Ms. Wallin has argued that flights between Ottawa and Saskatchewan are infrequent, and that her Saskatchewan home lies another two hours from the airport, making late-night travel difficult, particularly in the winter. When the costs were raised earlier this year, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Ms. Wallin’s travel claims are similar to those of other senators. The difference, as the auditors lay out, is her frequent stops in Toronto. The auditors say these costs totalled $31,025.
Changing the calendar
Deloitte found Ms. Wallin’s current Microsoft Outlook calendar was “inconsistent” with previously archived versions – dozens of meetings had been added, changed or deleted this year as she faced questions about her expenses. Asked Tuesday why the RCMP were called in, Conservative Senator Gerald Comeau said: “Well, the Deloitte report referred to inconsistencies.”
The auditors cite four examples, all from 2009. They include a June 4 flight to Toronto. According to the audit, Ms. Wallin said she flew back for a 5:30 p.m. Institute of Corporate Directors award ceremony. However, the audit found that the event was added in to the calendar in 2013. Previous versions show she arrived at 9 p.m. that night and submitted a claim for a ride from “airport to home.”
In another instance, she billed a flight from Ottawa to Toronto for “Senate business” on June 8, returning the next afternoon, according to the audit. Her current Outlook calendar shows two meetings, but auditors found her previous calendar said she was attending a convocation at the University of Guelph, where she served as chancellor. The Guelph information was deleted “some time in 2013” from her calendar, the auditors found.
In another case later that month, she billed a flight from Ottawa to Toronto for “senate business” to attend an event. The auditors ruled “it does not appear that she attended” and noted Ms. Wallin “subsequently agreed she likely did not attend.”
Finally, Ms. Wallin flew to Saskatoon in April, 2009, for a fundraiser for four Conservative riding associations. Her calendar was altered this year to remove “4 riding fundraiser” from her calendar, the auditors found.
Ms. Wallin’s lawyer, Terrence O'Sullivan, wrote Deloitte on July 26 outlining explanations of the changes to the Outlook calendar. It was treated “as a working document” to prepare it with as much as information as possible, he wrote, with omissions made to “protect the legitimate expectations of privacy” of those Ms. Wallin met with. Events were deleted if Ms. Wallin hadn't attended them, he said.
On trips where Ms. Wallin juggled both Senate business and other endeavours, she charged some trips to the Senate and others to a third party, he wrote. In cases where board meeting trips were accidentally charged to the Senate, she didn’t pocket money because companies would have reimbursed her anyhow, he argued. “It is important to note, however, that in no case was the Senator seeking personal gain,” Mr. O'Sullivan wrote.
Living expenses
Ms. Wallin was cleared by auditors for her housing claims, an area where her fellow troubled senators – Patrick Brazeau, Mike Duffy and Mac Harb – found themselves in trouble.The other trio found were asked to repay housing costs claimed in Ottawa for what auditors said were their primary residences. Senators living more than 100 kilometres outside Ottawa are permitted to claim some expenses for living costs in the capital, but those who live in the capital are not.
Deloitte found Ms. Wallin claimed $52,099 in expenses related to living in the Ottawa region, in both housing costs and hotel fees. Given her travel pattern, the auditors ruled she didn’t live in Ottawa, and was therefore entitled to claims, which the auditors said “appear to be appropriate in keeping with Senate practice.”
 
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sen...e-expenses-total-140k-audit-reveals-1.1404018

An independent audit of Senator Pamela Wallin's expenses has found ineligible claims amounting to as much as $140,000, and that the number of those claims is in the hundreds, CBC News had learned.
The 95-page report currently being viewed by a Senate subcommittee also reveals the Saskatchewan senator made attempts to change her expense paperwork after the fact.
Sources tell CBC News that the audit reveals the following:
  • The audit flags at least $120,000 in questionable claims, with another $20,000 to be decided by the Senate committee. Wallin has already voluntarily repaid $38,000.
  • Almost all of Wallin's problems revolve around travel expense claims, most notably dinners and other expenses in Toronto and Guelph, where she was chancellor of the University of Guelph and where she was doing university business rather than Senate business.
  • Wallin made or attempted to make retroactive redactions or changes to her calendar. Of Wallin's four former executive assistants, three have told Deloitte that they know of calendar entries that were altered by Wallin.
  • ......
 
四个高级助理抵不上一个绍兴师爷, 她缺那点钱么
 
后退
顶部