是否关心孩子在学校被教了什么？

[focus on today]

http://www.cultureguard.com/2017/06...t-sex-at-lunch-at-lord-byng-secondary-school/

Statement by Kari Simpson about “Sex at Lunch” at Lord Byng Secondary School
June 29, 2017 0 Comment

Click here for PDF version of Kari Simpson’s Statement about “Sex at Lunch” at Lord Byng Secondary School on June 14 2017

On June 14, 2017, I attended Lord Byng Secondary School in Vancouver, with a friend and local parental rights activist, Cecilia von Dehn. I had been informed about a lunch- time program through an old 2014, Vancouver Courier news story that interviewed a 16-year-old participant who had shared allegedly knowing that male porn stars, on average, had “9-inch penises compared to the average guy, 4.5.” She said the Sex at Lunch study of “Porn” was her favourite. Other studies mentioned included the “History of Masturbation” and singing the 12 Days of STDs (Sexually Transmitted Diseases), a revamp of the 12 Days of Christmas.

Sex at Lunch isn’t mentioned on the regular school calendar events listings that are published on the school’s calendar. Parent are deliberately not informed, and according to Vancouver Police Department School Liaison officer, Trevor LeTourneau, “not allowed.”

We entered the school at approximately 11:40 a.m. Unlike numerous other schools I’ve been to, there were no signs requiring us to report to the office. I asked a student to direct us to the auditorium and was provided with instructions. The route took us directly past the office. We stopped in front of the office to speak to another student, and nobody asked us to report.

We made our way down to the auditorium, and along the way we observed posters advertising the lunch time event.

We walked into the auditorium and were greeted by a woman wearing tight jeans and red stiletto heels. She was greeting the first of the students who were entering the auditorium, and offering them suckers from a basket she was holding.

We said “hello” and made small talk about the event, and then made our way to our seats.

A woman immediately approached me and identified herself as a doctor consultant. She asked what we were doing there. I replied that we were informed about this program and heard it was going to be a special event. I specifically told her that I was a parent and had heard about this “fun” event. I then asked her how many years the event had be going on. The woman chirpingly informed me that this was the third year the “Reach for the Top” event was being held. I asked who usually won, she said “The students.” I mentioned, in a happy tone of voice, how much fun the event was going to be, then turned my attention to my friend.

The woman went back to her seat. Another teacher descended upon us and we spoke briefly as the children began to swarm in. The lower balcony area of the auditorium was almost filled with students eating lunch and waiting for the event to commence.

I watched the teacher whispering to the Ms. Stiletto. Clearly they were uneasy, but nobody said anything further.

Ms. Stiletto grabbed the mic as four student panellists and four teacher panellists took their respective positions on the stage. The scorekeeper assumed her position and a male teacher by the name of Sean Nugent appeared as “game show host” for the event. I took my first picture and began an audio recording of the public and published school event; I also took notes.

Stiletto woman opened the event by welcoming the grade 10-12 students and then made a statement in which she called the grade 12 students “sex addicts.” Then came the directive to students not to record the event or take pictures. Nugent made some comment about being compromised on Instagram previously, and then threatened the kids that he would not do “Sex at Lunch” again if any of them posted information on social media.

The “Reach For the Top” event commenced, Students vs. Teachers. A series of questions were posed. These were sexually charged questions; not one dealt with the increasing rates of syphilis in Vancouver (now at a 30-year high among 19-24-year-old men who have sex with men (MSM).

Some examples of the questions:

• What does one use to perform safer oral sex on a woman?

(Answer: a dental dam.

• If you don’t want to masturbate, what should you eat for breakfast?

(Answer: Corn flakes or rice crackers— “both invented as anti-masturbation foods.”)

• People who enjoy putting on fuzzy animal costumes for sexual purposes are called…?

(Answer: Furbies)

• At which age do you text a picture of your naked bits?

(Answer: 18, Both students and teachers got this wrong)

• On the fifth day of Christmas, my true love gave to me…

(Answer: gonorrhea [laughter])

• Which country has a penis festival and a vagina festival?

(answer: Japan.)

There were nearly 50 questions in total, all similar in nature to the above. Not one questioned pertained to the billions of tax dollars that are spent on healthcare-related costs to treat sexually transmitted diseases that are 100% preventable. Not one question addressed the mental health issues related to promiscuity. Not one question related to abstinence.

This was not “sex ed.” This glimpse into Sex at Lunch was like watching an infomercial on how pedophiles groom their victims. Teachers, inviting kids to talk smut, giving them license to access— “study” — porn, promoting masturbation and equating intelligence to retained knowledge about porn star’s penis length would typically result in criminal investigation. Instead, school administrators and a VPD school liaison officer enabled 250 “soft target” minors to be victimized and corrupted.

This program is about the adults fulfilling their perverted needs. This was not about the best interest of minor children. These teachers/administrators and other enablers of this twisted program betrayed the trust of parents, betrayed the trust of these students by sexually exploiting them, and should be held to account.

If an adult neighbour or relative were caught inviting children to watch porn, discuss masturbation and engage sex talk about people dressing up in animal costumes to enjoy sex, that person would be arrested. Being a teacher and engaging in this conduct within the school does not immunize the conduct.

As the event came to a close, Ms. Stiletto once again went up on stage. With mic in hand she thanked the participants, gave the kids a swag bag (unknown what the contents were) and then proceeded to thank the teachers by gifting them each with a bottle of sexual lubricant. I took a picture—and was immediately chastised by a teacher, whom I ignored and waved off as I was trying to hear the last few words of the show.

The teachers began to get upset. My friend and I had also brought information to distribute to the kids. We began distribution as we left the auditorium. The teachers were distraught, nasty and continued to follow us as we made our way out of the school.

Vice Principal King caught up with us outside the courtyard and asked us to stop and talk with him. We did. I asked him for his name, and he provided it. He asked for mine, I told him he would find out soon enough; then we resumed our distribution of information for the students. The information clearly identified CultureGuard as the agent, and provided contact information.

The teachers followed as we made our way to the sidewalk, more joining in, including a scrawny, screeching woman who didn’t comprehend the fact that the public sidewalk is not part of the school’s property. She wanted to pick a fight but backed down when I turned to address her, and her colleagues cautioned her.

Students gathered and were smiling as we gave them info on how to record and report sex activist teachers and/or support their LGBTQ++ friends with their own money, not tax-payers’. Both very positive messages! We continued distributing our two-sided information bulletins on the sidewalk as the students returned back to school to commence their classes after lunch.

Transcript of the Sex at Lunch event.

Part 2 – Vancouver Police assault and Death Threats!?!

Part 3 – Vancouver School District Lawyers don’t want parents to know!! They sent a letter threatening me with legal action if I distribute my “Sex at Lunch” recording and pictures!! Here is my response.

Subscribe to CultureGuard.com and get these stories and more delivered to your email!

Phone: 604 514-1614 Email: CultureGuard@gmail.com Website: CultureGuard.com

 

[focus on today]

1
Phone: 604 514
-‐
1614 Email: CultureGuard@gmail.com
Website: CultureGuard.com
Harris & Company
Attention: Keith E. W. Mitchell
Via Email: kmitchell@harrisco.com
June 29, 2017
Re: Sex at Lunch/Yourthreats of Legal Action

Dear Sir,
Your emailed correspondence of June 27, 2017 amounts to a bad attempt at extortion
and/or capitalizing on the legal ignorance of those within the Vancouver School Board
who have retained you. I appreciate that justifying
billable hours appeases your law
firm, but will certainly anger Vancouver School District parents and other taxpayers.
I can say that it most certainly makes for a great story.
Be advised that your account of the events of June 14, 2017 are based on
misinformation. I am not known for mincing my words or being deceitful. Any informant
who states that I, or Cecilia von Dehn—the woman who accompanied me—claimed to
have checked into the office is lying. As for claiming to be a “parent”; when I was asked
if I was I parent, I answered in the affirmative. No deception there. I am a parent, I have
personally delivered four children into this world and I parented them —thus I am a
“parent”. Your contrary claim is wrong. Regarding your client, Trustee Dianne T
urner; it is regrettable that she is unwilling to meet with me. I am certain that this matter could have been resolved in a manner that would have resulted in VSD parents having some trust and confidence in the VSD leadership—that is if she and the VSD se nior administrative staff had taken the positionthat the sexual exploitation of minors at school by teachers, and deliberately deceiving parents, is a bad thing. Instead you have chosen to engage in legal bully tactics in an attempt to shut me down and restrict accurate information being reported. This rather bizarre strategy leaves parents with no other option but to conclude that it is the intention of the VSD to cover -up what has transpired.
2 I see from your bio that you clerked for Mr. Justice La Forest. It’s interesting to note that
I very recently used a passage from the decision he wrote for the Supreme Court
majority in BR v Children’s Aid Society in which he brilliantly asserts the rights of
parents to make decisions about their children — that is, when they are allowed to know
about them. You might recall these words:
Page 318 The common law has long recognized that parents are in the best position to
take care of their children and make all the decisions necessary to ensure
their well -being.
Page 319 While parents bear responsibilities toward their children, they must enjoy
correlative rights to exercise them, given the fundamental importance of choice and personal autonomy in our society. Although this liberty interest is not a parental right tantamount to a right of property in children, our society is far from having repudiated the privileged role parents exercise in the upbringing of their children. This role translates into a protected sphere of
parental decision -making which is rooted in the presumption that parents
should make important decisions affecting their children , both because
parents are more likely to appreciate the best interests of their children, and
because the state is ill -equipped to make such decisions itself.
To date, I have not seen any notification whatsoever to Lord Byng parents that their
children were sexually exploited and subjected to an obscene theatre performance
under the auspices of “sex ed”. Does your client intend to inform the parents, or will the
deception continue?
As you are well aware, this was a deliberate exercise in the sexual exploitation of
minors, designed to facilitate the perverted fantasies of teachers who enjoy grooming
children—“soft targets” —while believing, mistakenly, they are somehow benefitting
students via mind -poison, porn and smut and labeling them “sex -addicts”. T
his form of delusional thinking reminds me of the pedophile organization NAMBLA (North America
Man/Boy Love Association) who assert that men who sexually abuse and exploit young
boys, are really just loving/helping them. NAMBLA members, seemingly like those
adults involved in “Sex at Lunch”, would applaud the results the teachers and administrators conspired to achieve.
Of course, this is just my opinion as an unsuspecting “Sex at Lunch” audience member
and former Board member of the Child and Family Review Board, a quasi-judicial
provincial government appointment for overseeing the rights of children in BC. In my
professional work as a child and family rights advocate, I am well informed about the
sex abuse of children, including how children are groomed to be engaged, compliant
and keeping “special secrets”. I am also versed in the lasting ramifications suffered by
children from being victimized by sexual predators . I appreciate the issues of liability
3 your clients must be concerned about—minimizing exposure would reduce the potential
for lawsuits; but I cannot help you in that regard. In response to your assertions concerning my activities at the school and since; you arecorrect, I admit that I recorded this abusive, sexually exploitive event—“Sex at Lunch” —that was promoted and took place in a publicly-funded school.
You are semi-correct in that I have posted an image (not “images”) on social media.
You are incorrect to think I will remove them, will refrain from adding more or will limit
distribution. You will note that, unlike the teachers and administrators, I have protected
the identity of the children; I will not exploit them. But the so-called “teachers” and other
facilitators to this obscene production will be exposed. Parents have a right to know
whether they can trust their children’s’ teachers, vice principals, superintendents, and
trustees
...
I should also correct your use of the word “aggressive” in depicting the fervor in which I
distributed helpful information to students. A more accurate description would be
“enthusiastically”. And yes, the majority of students happily received the information
.
It was a positive exchange. It’s a shame that Vice Principal King, and a few squawky
teachers, prohibited students from exercising their right to information and free speech.
I suggest that you caution your informants from making false claims about me. They
will be sued. And as such, I request that you provide me the name of the individual, or
individuals, that informed you (or a nyone else) that we claimed to have “checked in at
the office”, or that I am not a parent.
As you have identified yourself as acting on behalf of the VSD, I request that you
provide me with the information I requested from Mr. King, specifically the names
of all attending teachers, and any other sanctioned adults that attended.
If your instructions are an attempt to bully me into silence through threat of legal action,
I should inform you that I don’t like bullies, and I can’t remember ever caving in to s
uch tactics. As such, be advised that If you intend to serve me with any form of legal notice,
please email in advance so I can convenience the service of any such documents. I’m
very busy these days: traveling, informing parents about the sex activists’
agenda within BC schools and elsewhere; but will certainly attempt to save Vancouver District parents some money by accommodating any such service.
I hope you are equally conscientious about squandering their money with frivolous
attempts at legal maneu verings, however creative.

Yours very sincerely,
Kari D. Simpson
Executive Director, CultureGuard

 

[focus on today]

http://www.parentsheart.ca/真人真事/

 

[focus on today]

Is Your Child Being Manufactured Into a Sex Activist Pawn?
May 15, 2017 4 Comments

Grooming children to become sex activists! That is a thing of the past. “Grooming” involves a subtle erosion of values and common sense. A feel-good lunacy develops from misinformation, gullibility, deception and pizza or other celebratory-associated items within the classroom. Your child’s mind is slowly altered to understand and accept a new confused social order.

Classroom manufacturing is the new and improved model of “grooming.” It expedites the process of brainwashing students into becoming sex activists, societal anarchists and “SJWs” (Social Justice Warriors). It compounds lunacy with delusion, and is now mandatory as approved school curriculum. This process deliberately creates confusion within children in the early stages of their development.

Children are currently being brainwashed into believing that there is no such thing as “male” or “female,” “boy” or “girl.” Such terms are now despised as being binary assigned societal gender constraints. Instead, children are informed that they can be any one of 63 genders depending on how they feel that day. One child in the Langley school district informed her parents that she was now a Caterpillar.

There are no “moms” or “dads” in children’s lives, according to the new world classroom order only guardians. The “sex-positive” screw-anyone-love-everyone socially irresponsible mantra gets played in a multitude of ways in the classroom, as it is now required to be integrated in all forms of studies. The anti-family political architects create pliable and programmable mini activists who are devoid of knowing right from wrong. Your children can no longer tell the difference between truth and deception. They will emotionally despise anyone—including parents—who attempt to speak fact into their lives.

This brainwashing technique exploits and preys on the vulnerability of a child. The newly manufactured being is then sent on missions within their schools—now at the behest of teachers—to create artwork, videos or school reports that reflect their alliance and willingness to contribute to societal disruption and the sex activist agenda of sexual and biological anarchy.

Ontario, Alberta and BC Teacher’s unions, aided and abetted by leftist lunacy, are fast-tracking the classroom brainwashing while bewildered parents try to rally support. The largest obstacle in convincing unaware parents that this is transpiring in the classroom is to bring them to a point of understanding the this is their child’s classroom reality. Once they grasp the depth of insanity that propagates from this educational “anti-bullying” exercise, parental outrage and righteous anger quickly follow.

Stop the abuse of children by sex activists. Stop the disruption of our civil society by these political proponents of our education system.

Subscribe to CultureGuard with the form in this page’s sidebar. It is free. Find out how you can save your children and grandchildren from this anti-family, anti-democratic political agenda.

 

[focus on today]

有谁愿意帮忙翻译成中文的， 请翻译后直接贴出来。对有些陪孩子上学的会有很大的帮助。