- 注册
- 2007-01-19
- 消息
- 28,903
- 荣誉分数
- 9,897
- 声望点数
- 373
胖子不是澄清了吗?那是2016年10月的录音,有什么违法之处吗?澄清个鬼,你根本就没读那报道吧?
我就说你没读那报道吧?胖子不是澄清了吗?那是2016年10月的录音,有什么违法之处吗?
http://bbs.comefromchina.com/threads/1633174/page-2#post-10940204
英文在这儿:
https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/what-the-doug-ford-tape-really-means-and-what-it-doesnt/
你们最好也让霍华丝出来把贪污的事澄清一下。
这就是彻底红卫兵做派了!你没有证据凭什么指控人家?人家要告你诽谤呢?我就说你没读那报道吧?福特说的是都两年前的事了,党内结案了,根本就不想说,记者一问就往其他话题上绕。但是党内怎么调查的,就是不给出调查报告。这叫澄清?这叫死猪不怕开水烫。
In a press conference on Thursday, he repeatedly referenced the fact that these were two-year-old allegations and tried to deflect every question to a canned response on hydro rates. He said the party investigated Martino’s claims and dismissed her appeal.
This is not going to cut it.
If you want to cite the results of an investigation to get out of allegations of wrongdoing, then you’d better be prepared to deliver that investigation.
If the party investigated Martino’s claims and rejected them, then they should release the results. Even if Ford merely helped to fudge Surma’s nomination papers, members should have questions about the quality of their party’s database, data handling, and accounting procedures.
其实你要是读读这篇文章的题记都会知道,啥澄清啊,不过就是浑水,胖子皮厚抵死不说,记者也暂时没办法挖出铁证而已。
Even if Ford merely helped fudge nomination papers, members should have questions about the quality of their party’s database.
土哥,另外你给的这篇文章里头还嵌了另两篇相关文章哈,光看题目都够了,离你以为的“澄清”远着呢。
Doug Ford hasn’t earned the benefit of the doubt on his nomination scandal
Doug Ford can’t hide behind the ‘Patrick Brown’ excuse anymore
不过我是没兴趣再细读了,就是给你点明一下,谁都不干净,乌鸦莫嫌猪黑。
当然,按明神父的说法,卖壳玲又是左媒了,fake news,不可信,只有曝光NDP的太阳报才是正经报纸,哦耶。![]()
有人质疑,事主出来澄清,正常程序。质疑者还觉得不过瘾,那就要更充分的铁证!没有证据就出来指控,那叫扣屎盆子,目的是恶心人,浑水摸鱼!土哥,另外你给的这篇文章里头还嵌了另两篇相关文章哈,光看题目都够了,离你以为的“澄清”远着呢。
Doug Ford hasn’t earned the benefit of the doubt on his nomination scandal
Doug Ford can’t hide behind the ‘Patrick Brown’ excuse anymore
不过我是没兴趣再细读了,就是给你点明一下,谁都不干净,乌鸦莫嫌猪黑。
当然,按明神父的说法,卖壳玲又是左媒了,fake news,不可信,只有曝光NDP的太阳报才是正经报纸,哦耶。![]()