导弹落入波兰村庄 美情报称或为乌克兰防空炮。这算乌克兰攻击北约国家吗

gocanoeing

本站元老
注册
2006-11-21
消息
15,243
荣誉分数
2,169
声望点数
373
11月15日,一枚据称“俄制”导弹落入波兰境内,造成2人死亡。克里姆林宫否认所有指控。美国方面初步调查显示,可能是乌克兰军队为拦截俄罗斯导弹所发射的防空导弹。
 
昨天那些嘲笑俄罗斯导弹不行的人,今天是不是应该反过来嘲笑其实是西方提供乌克兰的导弹很烂呢?
 
如果是乌的防空炮,那波兰有必要组成维和部队进入乌西。确保波安全。白俄有必要从乌北维和
 

NATO says Russia is ultimately to blame for Poland missile hit​


逻辑清楚,下次俄罗斯炸乌克兰,乌克兰就炸波兰,反正最终都怪俄罗斯:jiayou:
 

NATO says Russia is ultimately to blame for Poland missile hit​


逻辑清楚,下次俄罗斯炸乌克兰,乌克兰就炸波兰,反正最终都怪俄罗斯:jiayou:



能不能再追一层:
起因是北约5次东扩?
 

NATO says Russia is ultimately to blame for Poland missile hit​


逻辑清楚,下次俄罗斯炸乌克兰,乌克兰就炸波兰,反正最终都怪俄罗斯:jiayou:


我以前以为北约不懂往回倒找事件根源的道理。现在发现他们很懂。
 
S300是俄国导弹吧。我记得中国还进口过的。乌克兰有啥?就一个马达稀奇,还让中国给买了。
 
智能导弹。俄罗斯打乌克兰很准。乌克兰反击就往波兰方向。
 
波兰的反应有意思,开始发现是鹅制导弹,那个歇斯底里啊,拉着北约要大干一场;后来美国出来替大鹅说好话,“没有证据表明是俄发射的,可能是乌克兰发射的”,立马焉气了,总统出来说,“没有证据表明这是对波兰的蓄意进攻,这不是对波兰的攻击。”
大鹅也给美帝点赞了,说“美方反应很专业”
依我看,可能是波兰自导自演的,历史上,1931年的一个晚上,波兰就这么干过;
 
波兰的反应有意思,开始发现是鹅制导弹,那个歇斯底里啊,拉着北约要大干一场;后来美国出来替大鹅说好话,“没有证据表明是俄发射的,可能是乌克兰发射的”,立马焉气了,总统出来说,“没有证据表明这是对波兰的蓄意进攻,这不是对波兰的攻击。”
大鹅也给美帝点赞了,说“美方反应很专业”
依我看,可能是波兰自导自演的,历史上,1931年的一个晚上,波兰就这么干过;



难道波兰和很想打核大战?而且从波兰的国土上开始?
 
波兰的反应有意思,开始发现是鹅制导弹,那个歇斯底里啊,拉着北约要大干一场;后来美国出来替大鹅说好话,“没有证据表明是俄发射的,可能是乌克兰发射的”,立马焉气了,总统出来说,“没有证据表明这是对波兰的蓄意进攻,这不是对波兰的攻击。”
大鹅也给美帝点赞了,说“美方反应很专业”
依我看,可能是波兰自导自演的,历史上,1931年的一个晚上,波兰就这么干过;
如果换一国,即使证据确凿是乌克兰所为,那也要裁定是那国 --> 北约出兵
因为是俄国,即使证据确凿是俄所为,那也要安在乌克兰头上 --> 北约不敢出兵
说你是你就是不是也是。说你不是就不是是也不是
 
  • 喜欢
反馈: jy
难道波兰和很想打核大战?而且从波兰的国土上开始?

核战的可能性太低了,中美俄之间已经通气了,这次不玩核弹
波兰想把北约拉进来参战,借北约力量收复乌西部以前属于波兰的领土
 

Ukrainian official says Kyiv wants a ‘joint study’ and to see evidence on Poland missile strike​

Ukraine asked to see the evidence upon which NATO based its assessment that a missile strike on Poland that killed two people was likely caused by Ukraine’s air defenses trying to defend itself against a barrage of Russian missile attacks.
NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg insisted, however, that the strike was not a deliberate attack and that Ukraine was not to blame.
“Let me be clear, this is not Ukraine’s fault. Russia bears ultimate responsibility as it continues its illegal war against Ukraine,” Stoltenberg said at a press briefing.
After NATO’s comments, Oleksii Danilov, the head of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, tweeted that Kyiv favored a “joint study” into the incident, and wanted to see the evidence held by its allies that suggested it was involved.

Danilov said on Twitter that Ukraine was “ready to hand over the evidence of the Russian trail that we have” but Kyiv was still awaiting “information from our partners, on the basis of which a conclusion was made that it is a Ukrainian air defense missile.”

He added that Ukraine had requested that defense ministry and border guard officials are granted immediate access to the site of the explosion

乌克兰显然不愿意背锅,要求参加调查看证据:jiayou:
 
后退
顶部