Kanata 的选民们,

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 sip
  • 开始时间 开始时间
考虑自身利益就是了

其实,选谁是一个非常实际的事情。谁代表你的切身利益就选谁。如果你收入高,希望少缴税的,就选保守党。你生活困难,靠大锅饭来养的,就选自由党。喜欢吃救济的,就选NDP。就我本人的情况而言,极端痛恨高收税的自由党,收入的一半都交税了,所以决定选保守党。
 
其实,选谁是一个非常实际的事情。谁代表你的切身利益就选谁。如果你收入高,希望少缴税的,就选保守党。你生活困难,靠大锅饭来养的,就选自由党。喜欢吃救济的,就选NDP。就我本人的情况而言,极端痛恨高收税的自由党,收入的一半都交税了,所以决定选保守党。

GST可是你拥护的保守党在1991年发明的: Goods and Services Tax (Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

不管谁当政, 你的"收入的一半都交税了"这一点也不会改变, INCOME TAX 并没有变化.

"所有社会的阴暗面都是移民带来的", "反对堕胎", "保持极右观点"... 希望你坚定地跟随保守党.
 
Conservative is not the good guy either. The canadian 's massive's debt was loaded by conservative government in 80s. Stupid! Now we are paying for it. Can't trust them all. Just pick a little better "cat" for the moment.
 
其实,选谁是一个非常实际的事情。谁代表你的切身利益就选谁。如果你收入高,希望少缴税的,就选保守党。你生活困难,靠大锅饭来养的,就选自由党。喜欢吃救济的,就选NDP。就我本人的情况而言,极端痛恨高收税的自由党,收入的一半都交税了,所以决定选保守党。


你先去研究一下竞选纲领吧,自由党主张Cut个人所得税,这是NDP所反对的,因为很多穷人没有收入,也就无从收益。而保守党Cut的是Big Cooperation 的税。估计和你也不沾边。
 
如果你希望削减个人收入所得税,应当投自由党。而保守党Cut的是Big Cooperation 的税。
 
Lib are liars. Cut tax is always at their mouth.
1% GST, 100 per month per child, 500 credits, lower landing fee by half. Where is LIB when they controlled the government?
In Ontario I only remembered, I have to pay 1500 more for my health tax when I just heard the words from their mouth “I did not have sex with that woman”

 
你先去研究一下竞选纲领吧,自由党主张Cut个人所得税,这是NDP所反对的,因为很多穷人没有收入,也就无从收益。而保守党Cut的是Big Cooperation 的税。估计和你也不沾边。
自由党主张Cut低收入家庭的个人所得税,跟我确实不沾边。
 
GST可是你拥护的保守党在1991年发明的: Goods and Services Tax (Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)

不管谁当政, 你的"收入的一半都交税了"这一点也不会改变, INCOME TAX 并没有变化.

"所有社会的阴暗面都是移民带来的", "反对堕胎", "保持极右观点"... 希望你坚定地跟随保守党.
我无所谓坚定地跟谁走,谁对我有利我就选谁,这点道理连傻瓜都明白。自由党挥霍我们交的税钱,我当然不选它,就这么简单。
 
其实,选谁是一个非常实际的事情。谁代表你的切身利益就选谁。如果你收入高,希望少缴税的,就选保守党。你生活困难,靠大锅饭来养的,就选自由党。喜欢吃救济的,就选NDP。就我本人的情况而言,极端痛恨高收税的自由党,收入的一半都交税了,所以决定选保守党。

NDP - I used to have the same feeling on NDP supporters as yours. But I changed it a couple weeks ago when I knew one of our respected friends is a NDP supporter...

I don't know how much she earns here, but I do know that General Hospital could not afford to hire her as full time, and if she moves to the States by choice, she could easily get 400K US with incentives...

She certainly does not need 吃救济. I don't know how much is much in your dictionary, but I do know there is a word called ideology - even though we don't hear it so often now...

There are something in the world that money cannot buy...
 
Rich people can afford "ideology" if it makes him feel good. Poor people can dream "ideology" if would give him something. Middle class struggle to pay bills can’t afford “ideology”.
 
...Middle class struggle to pay bills can’t afford “ideology”.

Yes, you are right...I still haven't paid piano bill :) and I cannot afford NDP to target 150K+ families for tax increase..

What I am trying to say above is that we cannot stereotype...
 
自由党主张Cut低收入家庭的个人所得税,跟我确实不沾边。

Where did you get that? Unless you make $150 K each of you family and over $300 K household, you still get benefits from 自由党's policy. However, you must own a big company to get benefit from the conservertives. Which one is more in fever (沾边) to you?
 
自由党主张Cut低收入家庭的个人所得税,跟我确实不沾边。

碰到有钱淫了.

很遗憾, 加拿大是类似北欧的社会民主体制, 富人帮穷人, 不管谁当政, 这种社会根基不会变.
 
Where did you get that? Unless you make $150 K each of you family and over $300 K household, you still get benefits from 自由党's policy. However, you must own a big company to get benefit from the conservertives. Which one is more in fever (沾边) to you?
唉,我说这位,我只是在说我怎么看这个问题,本人对政治向来没反应。自由党把钱给教师工会,取消对教师的考核之类所为,本人不感冒。
 
后退
顶部