证据：一位基督徒就一个严肃的话题做了一个很有趣搞笑的报告；
结论：基督教很搞笑。
这似乎是一个典型的无神论者的“科学研究方式”？
的确很有点好笑。
希望大家能学学基督徒的严谨，即使只是网上的讨论：
学习历史：黑暗的中世纪?
http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum183/thread1167296.html
好笑的基督教
- 主题发起人 terry890
- 开始时间
希望大家能学学基督徒的严谨，即使只是网上的讨论：
学习历史：黑暗的中世纪?
http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum183/thread1167296.html
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
证据：一位基督徒就一个严肃的话题做了一个很有趣搞笑的报告；
结论：基督教很搞笑。
这似乎是一个典型的无神论者的“科学研究方式”？
That is a very stupid idea.
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
What kind of detail do you expect to discuss with someone who believes the universe is only six thousand years old and people can live 900 years, and a "don't know where it comes from" God creates the whole world in six days? And this person calls everything that conflicts with the bible "stupid"
- 注册
- 2008-10-02
- 消息
- 27,082
- 荣誉分数
- 7,173
- 声望点数
- 373
没看到基督徒严谨，看到的都是一些不知真假的引用，以良知和常识判断，假的可能性较大。
- 注册
- 2005-03-09
- 消息
- 8,494
- 荣誉分数
- 3,271
- 声望点数
- 373
基督教的严谨表现在宣称地球只有６０００年的历史，后来似乎觉得不妥，又改口说上帝是６０００多年前造人的。
又来了个什么'任何问题'讨论，然后再来一位哈女侠为你挡挡？呵呵，谢谢楼主。
在大家欣赏这一段轻松和谐的视频之后，也请大家欣赏一场高中科学课教师和世界顶尖进化论学者之间短兵相接的严肃讨论:
http://bbs.comefromchina.com/forum183/thread1177725.html
另外，我愿意给楼主一个挑战：我们可以就任何相关问题进行讨论。这讨论可以是常识层面、可以是科学层面、可以是信仰层面，当然，也可以是不计层面，聊到哪儿算哪儿。
看到这里，真要把人笑死了。哈哈，哈天使，有请。
- 注册
- 2012-11-15
- 消息
- 5,307
- 荣誉分数
- 1,815
- 声望点数
- 263
- 注册
- 2003-09-30
- 消息
- 79,763
- 荣誉分数
- 23,535
- 声望点数
- 1,373
that person divides the science into practical science and theoretical science. the practical science is good (well, it's been proven already, what else you can say about that?), but the theoretical ones are stupid I am not sure if he doesn't know or just ignore the fact that lots of nowadays practical science/technology was coming from just theories.
I am not sure if he doesn't know or just ignore the fact that lots of nowadays practical science/technology was coming from just theories.Kent's two main points:
1. All evidences that have been used support the evolution theory have been proven false;
2. If someone wants to believe it, that's fine. But don't use taxpayers' money to teach it because it is a religion.
1. All evidences that have been used support the evolution theory have been proven false;
2. If someone wants to believe it, that's fine. But don't use taxpayers' money to teach it because it is a religion.
