海牙仲裁庭无关联合国 那它是什么?

闹出点儿动静就是了,废纸一张。花钱是傻子。:p:D

解决国际问题说到底是靠炮舰。
废纸一张居然把咱政府吓出这么大动静?
 
这么说吧,这个南海仲裁庭,是临时拼凑的,是由美日菲操控的私人律师团。
历时3年,据说出了500页的报告,把太平岛也判成是礁。有悖常理,贻笑万方,居心叵测。
其实中国也可以其人之道、还治其人之身,来个以毒攻毒,反告他们的居心不良。

别偷鸡不成蚀把米。:evil:
 
废纸一张居然把咱政府吓出这么大动静?

历史上有几个仲裁结论履行了?
 
别偷鸡不成蚀把米。:evil:
我估计连WTO的判决的严肃性都没有。
本来喷一喷大陆那几个人工岛就可以了,可连台湾的太平岛都礁进去了,这不能不让人怀疑法官法院的智商。
一部严肃的约架立马变闹剧了。:monster:
 
我估计连WTO的判决的严肃性都没有。
本来喷一喷大陆那几个人工岛就可以了,可连台湾的太平岛都礁进去了,这不能不让人怀疑法官法院的智商。
一部严肃的约架立马变闹剧了。:monster:

屁用木有的玩意。谁当真谁就是傻子。

巴拿马、伊拉克,有联合国决议么。干掉了,咋地吧。:D
 
我估计连WTO的判决的严肃性都没有。
本来喷一喷大陆那几个人工岛就可以了,可连台湾的太平岛都礁进去了,这不能不让人怀疑法官法院的智商。
一部严肃的约架立马变闹剧了。:monster:
屁用木有的玩意。谁当真谁就是傻子。

巴拿马、伊拉克,有联合国决议么。干掉了,咋地吧。:D

把判决书当废纸,置之不理完全没有问题。
但是,对这张废纸背后的推手和企图则不可轻视。
 
把判决书当废纸,置之不理完全没有问题。
但是,对这张废纸背后的推手和企图则不可轻视。
对,看戏就的看这个。:D
 
把判决书当废纸,置之不理完全没有问题。
但是,对这张废纸背后的推手和企图则不可轻视。

对,看戏就的看这个。:D

看戏,好。对于这个仲裁,菲律宾官方的反应如何?

看戏,各个角色都得看。
 
看戏,好。对于这个仲裁,菲律宾官方的反应如何?
这案子三年半了,菲律宾他们今年新上了个民选总统,老的歇菜了。
俺六哥的意思是,要通过看这纸判决各方的态度来判断未来的政策走向,搅乱分化对手朋友圈。。。

这回拍案惊奇的是,本来是菲律宾诉中华人民共和国,我擦,连台湾也给判进去了,理由是台湾是中国不可分割的一部分,国际法庭的一中原则也算是一个亮点。:D
 
是“常设仲裁法院”接的这个申诉?“常设仲裁法院”认账么?费用打到“常设仲裁法院”的账上去了?

这是常设仲裁法院PCA官网上关于南海仲裁案件的资料。该案就是常设仲裁法院处理的。南海仲裁庭,就是常设仲裁法院为南海纠纷特别组成的临时仲裁庭。
https://pcacases.com/web/view/7

Case name
The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China

Case description
On 22 January 2013, the Republic of the Philippines instituted arbitral proceedings against the People’s Republic of China under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (the “Convention”), “with respect to the dispute with China over the maritime jurisdiction of the Philippines in the West Philippine Sea.” On 19 February 2013, China presented a Note Verbale to the Philippines in which it described “the Position of China on the South China Sea issues,” and rejected and returned the Philippines’ Notification. The Permanent Court of Arbitration acts as Registry in this arbitration.


Name(s) of Claimant(s)
The Republic of Philippines ( State )
Name(s) of Respondent(s)
The People’s Republic of China ( State )
Names of Parties
Case number 2013-19
Administering institution
Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

Case status
Pending
Type of case
Inter-state arbitration
Subject matter or economic sector
Law of the sea
Rules used in arbitral proceedings - Other -
Treaty or contract under which proceedings were commenced
Multilateral treaty
Treaty: UNCLOS

Language of Proceeding
English
Seat of Arbitration (by Country)
Netherlands
Arbitrator(s)
Judge Thomas A. Mensah (President)
Judge Jean-Pierre Cot
Judge Stanislaw Pawlak
Professor Alfred H. Soons
Judge Rüdiger Wolfrum


Representatives of the Claimant(s)
Agent
Solicitor General Jose. C. Calida
Office of the Solicitor General, Makati, Republic of the Philippines

Counsel
Paul S. Reichler
Lawrence H. Martin
Andrew B. Loewenstein
Foley Hoag LLP


Professor Bernard H. Oxman
University of Miami School of Law

Professor Philippe Sands QC
Matrix Chambers

Professor Alan Boyle
Essex Court Chambers


Representatives of the Respondent(s)
China has not appointed an agent. In a Note Verbale to the PCA on 1 August 2013, China reiterated “its position that it does not accept the arbitration initiated by the Philippines.”


Representatives of the Parties
Number of Arbitrators in case
5
Date of commencement of proceeding [dd-mm-yyyy]
22-01-2013
Date of issue of final award [dd-mm-yyyy]
12-07-2016
Length of Proceedings
3-4 years
Additional notes
Attachments Award or other decision
29-10-2015 English

12-07-2016 English


Other
 
常设仲裁法院的仲裁员是由各签约国所派的至多四位法官组成的,他们是组成一个具体仲裁庭的仲裁员候选人。常设仲裁法院的各国仲裁员团体,也是联合国国际法院的15位大法官的推荐人。

Members of the Court
Members of the Court are potential arbitrators appointed by member states. Each member state is entitled to nominate up to four persons of “known competency in questions of international law, of the highest moral reputation and disposed to accept the duties of arbitrators” as “Members of the Court.” Members of the Court are appointed for a term of six years, and their appointments can be renewed.

In addition to forming a panel of potential arbitrators, the Members of the Court from each member state constitute a “national group,” which is entitled to nominate candidates for the election to the International Court of Justice (article 4(1) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice). The Members of the Court (along with the judges of the ICJ) are among a handful of groups entitled to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize.
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的