America is already great again!

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
786063



(CNN) President Donald Trump spent the morning bragging about the economy. At least one of his claims didn't come close to being true.

"The GDP Rate (4.2%) is higher than the Unemployment Rate (3.9%) for the first time in over 100 years!" the president said in a tweet.

786062


The first two numbers are correct, although they measure completely different things, and in different ways.
The overall US economy grew at a 4.2% annual rate in the second quarter. Unemployment was between 3.8% and 4% during the quarter, and it came in at 3.9% in August.

That's all good news.

"It's definitely better when it's true than when it's not," said Justin Wolfers, professor of economics at University of Michigan. "I like high GDP growth and low unemployment."

But Trump got it wrong — way wrong — when he said it hasn't happened in a century.

In the last 70 years, it's happened in at least 62 quarters, most recently in 2006.

"He wasn't even in the neighborhood of right," Wolfers said in an interview.

Kevin Hassett, the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, acknowledged to reporters later in the day that the president's tweet was incorrect. He pointed out it was the first time in 10 years that GDP growth exceeded the unemployment rate.

"And at some point, somebody probably conveyed it to him, adding a zero to that, and they shouldn't have done that," he said.
Wolfers had tweeted a response to Trump's claim soon after he made it. In fact, it took him two tweets to list all the quarters in which economic growth was higher than the unemployment rate. He added a chart.

786085


"It certainly not a natural comparison," Wolfers said. "I've never seen it made before. It's not one that a macroeconomist would make. They're not comparable."

That's not just because lower unemployment is better, while higher GDP is preferable.

The unemployment rate is a monthly reading on the percentage of people in the labor force who are looking for work. It is a snapshot of a current condition.

GDP is a reading of the output of the overall economy. When economists talk about GDP growth, they're not talking about a snapshot of a current condition. They are measuring the change compared with a year earlier. Quarterly GDP growth is also adjusted to come up with the annual rate.
 
John McCain女儿的话。:p
说make America great again就应该说明啥时候美国great, 从啥时候起,美国不great, 才能说让美国 great again.
 
great again是2016大选的劳动号子。
美国一半人认同。这一半人平时沉默的羔羊,投票时才出来。结果就这样了。

结果经济指标翻红,黑人失业率历史新低。这还是贸易战阶段。
然后妓女,捅俄罗斯,等等等等都出来了,
然后川普抛出一个服务器,然后等等等等又都消停了。

没办法,奥巴马出来,说美国一直都great。
说经济好是奥巴马的功劳。哈哈。

咱加拿大人看大戏啊。
 
床铺现在的口号是Keep America Great! :D
 

这就是为什么2016,民主党以为大胜。实际上却大败亏输。一切都是有根源的。美国的盛衰。还是老百姓有发言权啊。
 
我感觉那些写川普书的人,也赚不了钱:没人真太关心川普说了啥做了啥,太烂太枯燥。那芭莎肉丝的书没出几天,就摆在打折摊那儿了。
对床铺来说,把would改成wouldn't都不是事儿。
 
亢龙有悔,盈能久乎?
同感,美国这次算是报复性的复苏。
去掉了诸多的行政干预,不惜贸易战,使用各种手段留下生产厂商,

这些手段都是对的,但是都在消耗美国的元气。
不消耗,美国玩完得更早。
消耗了,至少美国得到调整,政治经济至少得到缓冲。

这事儿就看其他power能不能抓住机会了。

我估计,其他power也没戏,最终至少30年内,美国虽然不可避免的颓废,但依然会是头把。
 
后退
顶部
首页 论坛
消息
我的