翻盘就在今晚!

德州检察官因滥用职权遭FBI调查。。。估计他替Trump挑头儿打官司是为了换取一个总统pardon。



 
德州检察官因滥用职权遭FBI调查。。。估计他替Trump挑头儿打官司是为了换取一个总统pardon。



这媒体是高级黑呢,还是低级红呢。看来看去还是猪党最无耻,于土工的手法最象。
 

又输一阵。

Wisconsin State Court Judge Rules Against Trump Lawsuit​

Wisconsin State Court Judge Rules Against Trump Lawsuit

(Andy Manis/Getty Images)
Friday, 11 December 2020 12:53 PM

President Donald Trump lost a Wisconsin lawsuit Friday seeking to disqualify more than 221,000 ballots and overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, the latest in a string of legal defeats.

Reserve Judge Stephen Simanek ruled against every argument Trump made challenging ballots in the state's two largest counties, saying the election was properly administered and there was no wrongdoing as the president alleged.

“The bottom line here is that the court should do everything to ensure that the will of the voters prevail,” the judge said.

Trump planned to quickly appeal the ruling to the conservative-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court. Trump also has a federal lawsuit in Wisconsin where the judge could rule as soon as Friday.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court court previously refused to hear Trump's state case before it went through the lower courts. A majority of justices have also openly questioned whether disqualifying the ballots, as Trump wants, would be appropriate.

Trump has urged lower court judges to rule quickly in the cases so he can file appeals before the Electoral College meets on Monday and casts Wisconsin’s 10 votes for Biden. That set up the possibility of a rare weekend ruling from the state Supreme Court.

Biden won Wisconsin by about 20,600 votes, a margin of 0.6% that withstood a Trump-requested recount in the state’s two largest counties, Milwaukee and Dane. Trump did not challenge any ballots cast in the counties he won.

Trump wanted to disqualify absentee ballots cast early and in-person, saying there wasn’t a proper written request made for the ballots; absentee ballots cast by people who claimed “indefinitely confined” status; absentee ballots collected by poll workers at Madison parks; and absentee ballots where clerks filled in missing information on ballot envelopes.

Trump’s attorney Jim Troupis argued that clerks in Milwaukee and Dane counties were wrong to rely on guidance from the Wisconsin Elections Commission on absentee ballots. He argued that guidance, some of which had been in place for years or was modified in reaction to the coronavirus pandemic to make it easier for indefinitely confined people to cast ballots, contradicted state law.

Biden attorney John Devaney argued that everyone who voted in the presidential election did so “in full compliance of the laws that were in effect at the time of the election.” There is no evidence of fraud or illegal activity, he said. Devaney also said Trump “cynically” targeted ballots cast in Wisconsin’s two most urban, non-white counties for disqualification.

Devaney noted that no one challenged the laws that had been in place prior to this election, including Trump when he won the state in 2016.

The judge agreed with Biden's attorneys that Wisconsin law was followed during the election and recount.

A Trump-appointed federal judge in Wisconsin said Thursday that the president's lawsuit was “incredible,” “bizarre,” and “very odd,” and that overturning the results would be “the most remarkable ruling in the history of this court or the federal judiciary.”

U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig promised to issue his ruling as soon as Friday.

Also Friday, Republican-controlled committees in the state Legislature held an invite-only public hearing to accept testimony about the election.

Republicans asked mainly conservative partisans to speak, including a Milwaukee talk radio host, but not the state's top elections official or the head of elections in the city or county of Milwaukee. Democrats decried the hearing as a farce.

 

法学家贺卫方遭围攻:自由派中的华人川粉​


2020-12-10 17:48 来源:澎湃新闻·澎湃号·湃客

沉思的托克维尔

原创 艾尔文团长 沉思的托克维尔

(川普支持者和川粉不是一回事,我文中的川粉专指只相信川普一人的人,很多人只是川普支持者,而非川粉。)

2020美国大选,很多自由派仿佛丧失了理智,他们一边抨击中国人愚昧,一方面却如此疯狂的追捧川普,他们自动屏蔽了川普之外所有的信息源,并将他们曾心驰神往的美国解构为一团谎言。

这些自称自由派,多为中产阶级的华人川粉在川普这个问题上仿佛丧失了所有的理智,他们甚至沦为了比白人川粉还要疯狂的存在,他们中的一些人一见到不同政见者,就群起而攻之,毫无自由主义宽容的精神。就连曾经自由派内颇受尊敬的贺卫方都遭到了围攻。

前几天,法学家,自由派老人贺卫方写了一封信,在信中,他回复了川普支持者的几个问题,他在信中质疑了川粉的几个说法,认为这些说辞缺乏证据。

贺卫方怀着极为谦虚的语气给他们提出建议,希望他们能注意到自己逻辑的错误,他在信中澄清了美国大选中的一些谣言,他希望这些号称自由派的川粉能够甄别一下网络上的信息,不要人云亦云。虽然贺是善意的,但他的这封信最终遭到了所谓自由派的集体攻击。

他们对贺群起而攻之,其中一些话非常难听,这个曾经在圈内德高望重的老学者顿时成了众矢之的。

689.jpg


我看了一下贺卫方的信,其实他只是指出了事实,并无挑衅之意,他在信中指出了川粉几个显而易见的错误。

一是拜登曲线问题。

川粉认为大选当日几个州都是川普大幅领先,但在选举夜之后形势迅速逆转由川普领先变为拜登领先,川粉认为这样魔幻的逆转一定是拜登舞弊。

贺卫方认为这种说法没有根据,他认为拜登曲线的信息源并不可靠,缺乏证据。他认为川粉忽视了各州统计选票的具体程序(例如先统计大选日投票,再统计邮寄选票),贺认为按照谁指控谁举证的原则,质疑程序的川粉需要提供证据。

贺卫方的质疑很有道理,实际上宾州、密歇根、威斯康星三州都是大选日才允许拆封邮寄选票,自然邮寄选票的统计要慢于大选日投票,所谓的大选夜逆转不过是因为统计选票的时间差,目前三州的法院和两党干部都未发现选举舞弊的证据。
690.jpg
(拜登曲线似乎最早是日本网友提的)

二是川普律师的指控。

贺卫方认为川粉对朱利安尼的迷信没有道理他首先说美国没有什么大律师之说,而且朱利安尼在法庭辩论时,行家发现他对于宪法诉讼的基本概念缺乏研究。贺认为朱利安尼的言论在法院判决前只是普通的证词,不具有任何法律效力,更不代表真理。

三是从家庭背景和教育子女方面,川普与拜登二选一,你们选谁?

贺卫方认为的这个问题偏离主题,他说选总统不是选岳父,而且川普的家庭并不像他们说的那么好,而且他反对川普将一家人带到白宫掌权的行为,认为川普将白宫变成了中世纪宫廷。

四是关于媒体。

贺卫方认为主流媒体全都对抗川普的说法站不住脚,他举出了FOX和华尔街日报,说他们一直比较偏向川普,而且油管推特也没有封杀川普的言论,只是标注了存在争议的标签,美国的媒体是私人的,私人当然可以有自己的倾向,而且据他观察,这种倾向主要是立场而非歪曲事实。他认为川粉关于媒体掌握生杀大权的说法更是无稽之谈。

五是拜登天主教徒,而川普是五月花号教徒,拜登上台谁最高兴?

贺卫方认为这个问题很荒谬,认为不应该歧视天主教信仰,而且上台谁高兴,应该先问投了拜登的8000多万选民。

通篇看下来,我实在不明白贺的言论有什么可喷的,他语气平和,一直在进行讨论,并未对川普和川粉进行人身攻击。(信中原文并未用川粉一词)

但就是这样平和的讨论,川粉都容不下。

实际上贺不是唯一一个遭到川粉围攻的人,很多客观分析事实的自媒体,包括我,都遭到了川粉的集中攻击,其中一些话非常恶毒,但我依然将这些留言放了出来,我原以为随着川普的失败他们能逐渐理性,但没想到他们继续自我催眠,更加的相信川普。

他们支持川普的原因只是因为川普反共,反对一切左派,他们厌恶任何和“左”字沾边的东西,他们渴望川普能化为救世主,满足他们心里那不切实际的幻想。更可怕的是,他们有很多是中产阶级和知识分子,他们一直标榜自己的理性和智慧,但他们最终自己却拜倒在川普脚下,成了唯他是从的川小将。

他们对川普偏听偏信,疯狂的拥护他,为了他他们会攻击任何异议人士,他们不仅攻击中国,还将美国也说为一团谎言,美国的媒体、宪政、法院在他们口中都成了骗子。他们空有自由主义的外壳,骨子里却是极权主义思维,救世主情节持续在他们身上发作。

他们不仅反华,而且反美,他们跟着川普解构了美国所有的制度,其威力甚至超过了粉红,他们同时遭到了中美两国的摒弃。

695.jpg
698.jpg


他们的存在也告诉我们号称理性的自由派实际上也是鱼龙混杂,其中有些人空有自由主义的皮,而无自由主义的实。

自由主义除了要求保障个人权力,最重要的是理性,脱胎于启蒙运动的自由主义要求人要独立进行判断,不迷信任何一个权威。

一个自由主义者基本的原则应该是不粉任何一个人,不粉任何一个国家,吹中国不对,吹美国也不对,谁有错误就批评谁,对谁都不盲从,这才是真正的自由主义。

但在实际中,做到这一点的自由派并不多,他们更为人所熟知的是普遍双标,对于中国严苛,对美国则宽容,而如今变成了只对川普宽容,对其他所有人苛刻。他们应该学会成为不预设立场的忠诚反对派。

对于中国的问题要批判,对于中国的成就要肯定,同时对美国也应保持大体不差的标准,只有奉行实事求是的原则,才能赢得公众的信任,而对于中国的精英群体来说,要想具备法治和自由的思想,恐怕还有很长一段路要走。

原标题:《法学家贺卫方遭围攻:自由派中的华人川粉》

 
今晚暂不翻盘。风紧扯乎
 
最后编辑:
别慌。私底下多接触几个选举人,让他们反水。金钱美女蓝金黄,不信不翻盘。
 
媒体不就是监督政府运作的吗?白灯石翠了,媒体开始监督他了,唱反调了。
他们理解不了,成天在做美梦。前几天不是很兴奋地说CNN也叛变了,所有媒体都不称呼,president-electe了,好像已经是4 more years 了,就像看到竞选集会的热烈场面早就以为胜券在握了一样。
 
实锤!已有超过四十名选举人表示要反水!
 
后退
顶部