明天将离任的NIH主任说川普和共和党人对他施压,要求他批准未经证实的Covid疗法,如羟氯喹,解雇福奇

lindamy

时代广场舞照跳
VIP
注册
2005-11-23
消息
30,365
荣誉分数
7,477
声望点数
373

Outgoing NIH director says Trump and other Republicans pressured him to endorse unproven Covid-19 remedies and to fire Fauci​

By Deidre McPhillips and Devan Cole, CNN

Updated 8:48 PM ET, Sun December 19, 2021

Washington (CNN)The outgoing director of the National Institutes of Health said Sunday that he faced political pressure from then-President Donald Trump and other Republicans to endorse unproven Covid-19 remedies such as hydroxychloroquine and to fire Dr. Anthony Fauci, the head of NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Dr. Francis Collins, whose last day as NIH director is Sunday, told CBS News that he got a "talking to" by Trump, but that he held his ground and would have resigned if Trump made him endorse remedies for Covid-19 that were not based in science.

"I have done everything I can to stay out of any kind of political, partisan debates because it is really not a place where medical research belongs," he said. "I was not going to compromise scientific principles to just hold onto the job."

Trump frequently touted hydroxychloroquine as a potential Covid-19 cure, and he claimed while in office to have used it himself even as medical experts and the US Food and Drug Administration questioned its efficacy and warned of potentially harmful side effects. In June 2020, the FDA revoked its emergency use authorization for both hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for the treatment of Covid-19, saying it determined the drugs were unlikely to be effective in treating Covid-19 based on the latest scientific evidence.

CNN has reached out to the office of the former President for comment on Collins' interview.

Collins also said he fought back calls from Republicans for him to fire Fauci, the nation's top infectious disease expert who now serves as President Joe Biden's chief medical adviser.
"Can you imagine a circumstance where the director of the NIH, somebody who believes in science, would submit to political pressures and fire the greatest expert in infectious disease that the world has known, just to satisfy political concerns?" he said.

Fauci has faced harsh criticism from Republicans, including Trump, during the pandemic, with the longtime public servant being assailed for what they see as an overly cautious approach to the crisis and his occasional reversal on some key issues, including mask-wearing.

Collins said on Sunday that during his 12 years serving as NIH director, one thing he would have studied more carefully is hesitancy.

"I did not imagine there would be 60 million people who, faced with compelling evidence of the life-saving nature of Covid vaccines, would still say, 'No, not for me,'" he said.

 
真是走火入魔了,老川都下台快一年了。解雇福奇和用羟氯喹能错到哪去吗。福奇又干了这么久,还是在美国有世界最好的疫苗和你们推崇的拜登的的领导下,死的人和染疫的少了吗。去年死的人每上一个台阶,欢呼着赶上韩战越战二战,拜登弄死的现在也快超过二战了吧,是不是该倒计时一下,看看拜登福奇和最牛疫苗治下的美国死亡和染疫人数还差多少能赶上缺乏治疗手段和设备甚至一开始很长时间口罩都缺乏的川普时代。
 
不知有谁推崇拜登?他只是一位比最差的略强点的老人,但凡对手稍微正常点,大位也轮不到他。

羟氯喹的效果怎么样应当已经有结论了。其他很多措施半斤八两。作为外行,我不够资格评价福奇的作用。
 
在关于这位今天离任NIH主任的视频中,主持人悲愤地说美国占世界人口的6%,却包揽了15%的Covid 死亡人数。

至于失败的原因吗,左右肯定是互相指责,统一的定论估计等到天荒地老也看不到。
 
不知有谁推崇拜登?他只是一位比最差的略强点的老人,但凡对手稍微正常点,大位也轮不到他。

羟氯喹的效果怎么样应当已经有结论了。其他很多措施半斤八两。作为外行,我不够资格评价福奇的作用。
都快变祥林嫂了,我这么一比较,你也发现拜登治下也不咋的了吧,福奇干了两年对付疫情也不咋的吧,你说外行不评价福奇,其实本意你是认为福奇很出色才会认为川普要炒福奇很荒谬。
羟氯喹效果如何其实早就不重要了,在当时没有多少选择的紧急情况下冒险去用一些没有证实过的疗法,犹如战场上在某些紧急情况下的破釜成舟。疫苗到现在也没达到预期的效果,发展两年来很多人说过的话都被打脸,so what,打脸就打脸也没啥大不了,这东西一开始谁能想到会发展到这一步。
 
都快变祥林嫂了,我这么一比较,你也发现拜登治下也不咋的了吧,福奇干了两年对付疫情也不咋的吧,你说外行不评价福奇,其实本意你是认为福奇很出色才会认为川普要炒福奇很荒谬。
羟氯喹效果如何其实早就不重要了,在当时没有多少选择的紧急情况下冒险去用一些没有证实过的疗法,犹如战场上在某些紧急情况下的破釜成舟。疫苗到现在也没达到预期的效果,发展两年来很多人说过的话都被打脸,so what,打脸就打脸也没啥大不了,这东西一开始谁能想到会发展到这一步。
敌方在释放生物武器之后,故意利用对方机构臃肿官僚主义,医疗体制精英化权威化的特点,重点照顾权威人士,使得挑战权威成为政治话题,进而达到对方伤亡人数增加,拖垮对方经济,保证己方经济增长,从而进一步缩小差距,保证己方优势的目的
 
不是没有人想到疫苗会这么糟糕,早在疫情初期就有专家说这个病毒是高度超高度变异的,疫苗赶不上变异快,所以疫苗的作用不大。
但是内行的专家利令智昏一意孤行。。。
 
都快变祥林嫂了,我这么一比较,你也发现拜登治下也不咋的了吧,福奇干了两年对付疫情也不咋的吧,你说外行不评价福奇,其实本意你是认为福奇很出色才会认为川普要炒福奇很荒谬。
羟氯喹效果如何其实早就不重要了,在当时没有多少选择的紧急情况下冒险去用一些没有证实过的疗法,犹如战场上在某些紧急情况下的破釜成舟。疫苗到现在也没达到预期的效果,发展两年来很多人说过的话都被打脸,so what,打脸就打脸也没啥大不了,这东西一开始谁能想到会发展到这一步。
反正必须是床铺的错!白等和-7两个白痴永远是对的!:tx:
 
都快变祥林嫂了,我这么一比较,你也发现拜登治下也不咋的了吧,福奇干了两年对付疫情也不咋的吧,你说外行不评价福奇,其实本意你是认为福奇很出色才会认为川普要炒福奇很荒谬。
羟氯喹效果如何其实早就不重要了,在当时没有多少选择的紧急情况下冒险去用一些没有证实过的疗法,犹如战场上在某些紧急情况下的破釜成舟。疫苗到现在也没达到预期的效果,发展两年来很多人说过的话都被打脸,so what,打脸就打脸也没啥大不了,这东西一开始谁能想到会发展到这一步。
LOL! 我推崇过拜登?很讨厌川普倒是有的。拜登目前面临两大难关,举步维艰。一个是Manchin, 一个是omicron.

该不该炒福奇,我没有想法,不了解其他人谁比他更合适,说遭遇压力的是NIH的主任。你猜测我的想法没用,我只是翻译了一下新闻。和祥林嫂没关系,你过敏了。

羟氯喹也一样,不是我要提,是离任的主任庆幸去年顶着压力取消了羟氯喹治疗的授权。
 
都快变祥林嫂了,我这么一比较,你也发现拜登治下也不咋的了吧,福奇干了两年对付疫情也不咋的吧,你说外行不评价福奇,其实本意你是认为福奇很出色才会认为川普要炒福奇很荒谬。
羟氯喹效果如何其实早就不重要了,在当时没有多少选择的紧急情况下冒险去用一些没有证实过的疗法,犹如战场上在某些紧急情况下的破釜成舟。疫苗到现在也没达到预期的效果,发展两年来很多人说过的话都被打脸,so what,打脸就打脸也没啥大不了,这东西一开始谁能想到会发展到这一步。
你这个说法的一个问题是你似乎认为只有能准确预测未来的人才能合格的坐福其的那个位子,不过这样的人不存在
 
你这个说法的一个问题是你似乎认为只有能准确预测未来的人才能合格的坐福其的那个位子,不过这样的人不存在
我的意思是福奇没啥了不起炒了也就炒了,留着他又干了一年,美国也没好去哪里。把川普有意炒福奇当作是川普的污点来攻击,这福奇不又干了一年美国比别的国家强去哪呢,这还是把持着最好疫苗的情况下,所以当初如果炒了福奇又能错去哪里呢。
 
我的意思是福奇没啥了不起炒了也就炒了,留着他又干了一年,美国也没好去哪里。把川普有意炒福奇当作是川普的污点来攻击,这福奇不又干了一年美国比别的国家强去哪呢,这还是把持着最好疫苗的情况下,所以当初如果炒了福奇又能错去哪里呢。
害处大了,会对所有正直的人造成寒蝉效应。跟疫情更好或者更差没有关系。
不因为政治原因而开除跟自己观点不同的人恰恰是美国立国之本,如果这个都没有,跟中国有什么区别?
 
害处大了,会对所有正直的人造成寒蝉效应。跟疫情更好或者更差没有关系。
不因为政治原因而开除跟自己观点不同的人恰恰是美国立国之本,如果这个都没有,跟中国有什么区别?
福奇难道是政治观念不同?

他与中国合作,拨经费给武汉P4实验室做实验,难道是正确的?

我看这美国和当年的国民党没啥区别,如果不抓紧甄别,迟早被中共给吃了
 
后退
顶部