采用Mobile技术的Notebook比普通的好很多吗？

[questionss]

比如Intel Mobile 1.4G的，和普通3.2G的笔记本在其他条件同样的情况下，哪个好？
谢谢！

 

[STi]

Mobile chips save power, especially the Pentium M processors. A notebook equipped with Pentium M will run for 4 to 5 hours, while a Pentium 4 M will run for a little over 2 hours. Notebooks with a desktop Pentium CPU will run only 1.5 to 2 hours. Speed wise, a 1.6G Pentium M is almost as fast a a 2.6G Pentium 4M.
Which one is better depends on how you use your notebook. If you take it out often, then you'll need a Pentium M, or at least a P4M notebook to have longer running time. But if you use it as a desktop replacement and leave it home most of the time, then getting a notebook with a P4 3.2 G CPU will give you the fastest speed.

 

[questionss]

cool, thanks a lot

 

[大熊猫]

我觉得他问的是采用迅驰技术的和普通的之间的区别，不是问采用mobile的CPU和desktop的CPU之间的区别。

 

[questionss]

最初由 大熊猫 发布
我觉得他问的是采用迅驰技术的和普通的之间的区别，不是问采用mobile的CPU和desktop的CPU之间的区别。

then what is the difference between centrino and normal techs?

 

[StillBest.com]

最初由 大熊猫 发布
我觉得他问的是采用迅驰技术的和普通的之间的区别，不是问采用mobile的CPU和desktop的CPU之间的区别。

老兄，那个迅驰技术到底是什么啊

 

[STi]

Intel's Centrino Technology. Consists of a Pentium M processor, Intel 855 chipset and Intel Pro wireless controller.

 

[questionss]

what's the advantage though

 

[大熊猫]

http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/w/2003-03-31/1815174791.shtml

 

[大熊猫]

AMD就把这种技术讥讽为旧瓶装新酒，是欺骗消费者。

 

[questionss]

should be 新瓶装旧酒, hehe

 

[StillBest.com]

没用

 

[大熊猫]

最初由 questionss 发布
should be 新瓶装旧酒, hehe

:blowzy: :blowzy: :blowzy:

 

[泛蓝]

再不考虑价格，不考虑耗电量，单单考虑性能时，p4 2.66和p-M 1.6,哪个好？

 

[大熊猫]

最初由 泛蓝 发布
再不考虑价格，不考虑耗电量，单单考虑性能时，p4 2.66和p-M 1.6,哪个好？

肯定是P4 2.66好啊。差很多啊。
http://www.gb.tomshardware.com/cpu/03q1/030226/index.html