精华 “最近有点烦”同学的倡议书，请路过的朋友打下来，签上名，寄给媒体和政府

[最近有点烦]

Calm down, everyone, please.

I think both side have some points. However, this is just a letter written by citizens. In this regard, two points need to be reinforced:

1. Respect the facts wherever we can.

2. Being a bit "emotional" is quite normal.

So, just do it. We are citizens. Why not just sign and sent our voice out. Let the lawyers do their job then.

 

[google777]

支持原文！

不爽， 我一小时前刚考完CRIMINAL LAW，一上来就碰到高谈法律知识和热忠于英文写作的朋友。

 

[只在乎曾经拥有]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: “最近有点烦”同学的倡议书，请路过的朋友打下来，签上名，寄给媒体和政府

最初由 DickStrong 发布


Alright, if this is what it's all about.

And thank you for serving our country. May I ask which case you deliberated? Was there a fight among the members?

Will you disclose the true identity of "DickStrong" on CFC?


P.S. sorry LZ for being a little bit stray.

 

[google777]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: “最近有点烦”同学的倡议书，请路过的朋友打下来，签上名，寄给媒体和政府

最初由 DickStrong 发布


Personally I don't agree with this. Recall the R. vs. Pan case where the judge declared mistrial upon the misconduct of a juror. The other jurors alleged that she has lied about her knowledge about the case during the selection process.

R. v. Pan... Nice ...what a showoff.

I'd admire you brain (comparing to the alleged strong dick) had you given the proper citation of the case.

 

[骨髓精灵]

支持

 

[left]

ding

 

[我亦有亭]

谢谢各位顶贴，对于持不同意见的朋友，亭子还是原来的初衷：请提供更好的版本和处理方案，我和我的朋友们都会尽量去做！

 

[~鸡蛋壳~]

支持

 

[只在乎曾经拥有]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: “最近有点烦”同学的倡议书，请路过的朋友打下来，签上名，寄给媒体和政府

最初由 DickStrong 发布

Personally I don't agree with this. Recall the R. vs. Pan case where the judge declared mistrial upon the misconduct of a juror. The other jurors alleged that she has lied about her knowledge about the case during the selection process.

You are switching the concept.

A challenge to "fair selection of jury" is not a challenge due to "misconduct of a juror".

Public awareness of a case may result in a challenge to "fair selection of jury".

But the public awareness of a case does not lead to a challenge of mistrial due to "misconduct of a juror" as a juror can lie about her knowledge about the case which the public does not know.

 

[只在乎曾经拥有]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: “最近有点烦”同学的倡议书，请路过的朋友打下来，签上名，寄给媒体和政府

最初由 DickStrong 发布


I don't want to spend a lot of time explaining this to you. If you have time, study the case and the appeal court judges' dicision. If you still think you are right, leave it as is.

I have no problem with the case itself.

I have a problem when you use the case to support your comment that a public letter (stating a fact) will lead to a mistrial.

Please focus to the point, do not expand.

If you want to cite a case, cite a convincing one, i.e, a judge ruled a mistrial due to a public letter calling the individual who committed murder of two lifes "a merciless murderer". (No "suspect" please, we did not have one at that time).

I will not reply to you if you do not focus to the original point and cite a convincing case. bye.

 

[只在乎曾经拥有]

谢谢 DickStrong 自己清理不正确言论。

再次支持LZ， 惩罚元凶。

 

[实话]

顶！

 

[最近有点烦]

加拿大警方总算在我的“有点烦”底线--12月16号到来之前，锁定了犯罪嫌疑人。

这点值得鼓励。

天网恢恢，疏而不漏

 

[wjg18]

support!!!!