GeorgeSong
新手:-)
- 注册
- 2004-06-09
- 消息
- 237
- 荣誉分数
- 7
- 声望点数
- 28
出来了。Chinese is just 3% of whole canadians. Doesn't matter they choose which party, Conservative must win this time because they are ahead 10% than Liberal.
如果加国保守党上台，估计加国的好日子要到头了：
- 主题发起人 土鳖虫
- 开始时间
出来了。Chinese is just 3% of whole canadians. Doesn't matter they choose which party, Conservative must win this time because they are ahead 10% than Liberal.
wushuren
综合杂谈名誉斑竹
- 注册
- 2002-02-10
- 消息
- 6,500
- 荣誉分数
- 9
- 声望点数
- 0
不知道NDP和自由党差多少？
如果保守党赢了成为少数政府，能把自由党变成第三党，吓唬自由党一下，把NDP变成第二党，保守党的哈勃作为伟大的政治家去和自由党的马大拿们抛眉眼儿组成联合政府，利用自由党内人才的治国经验和务实主义，并且自由党的中性平衡保守党的右翼倾向，NDP作为议会最大反对党拿理想主义和这帮家伙唱高调，那是再好不过的了。那就是三赢局面。然后下次再让自由党玩大，把NDP玩小。那么这次选举，就是三赢局面，押大的可以赢，押小的也可以赢。赶紧押了，马上要开了阿。
（奇怪，这怎么好像是小说情节？）
如果保守党赢了成为少数政府，能把自由党变成第三党，吓唬自由党一下，把NDP变成第二党，保守党的哈勃作为伟大的政治家去和自由党的马大拿们抛眉眼儿组成联合政府，利用自由党内人才的治国经验和务实主义，并且自由党的中性平衡保守党的右翼倾向，NDP作为议会最大反对党拿理想主义和这帮家伙唱高调，那是再好不过的了。那就是三赢局面。然后下次再让自由党玩大，把NDP玩小。那么这次选举，就是三赢局面，押大的可以赢，押小的也可以赢。赶紧押了，马上要开了阿。
（奇怪，这怎么好像是小说情节？）
GeorgeSong
新手:-)
- 注册
- 2004-06-09
- 消息
- 237
- 荣誉分数
- 7
- 声望点数
- 28
Your idea is great. Tell us how to do it.
GeorgeSong
新手:-)
- 注册
- 2004-06-09
- 消息
- 237
- 荣誉分数
- 7
- 声望点数
- 28
加国的好日子没必到头了，但某些人的好日子可能要到头了。
wushuren
综合杂谈名誉斑竹
- 注册
- 2002-02-10
- 消息
- 6,500
- 荣誉分数
- 9
- 声望点数
- 0
现在为止，试图实现这主意的努力只能是铁杆儿保守党投保守党，铁杆自由党投自由党，华人中的犹豫不定者和外围选票全部去投NDP,反正NDP不可能当选为执政党，不必担心加税，对自由党有意见的人改投了NDP,实际上也帮了保守党，给了自由党一个教训。NDP的理想主义者们一高兴，看到自己在华人中的支持率大增，会更卖力气地维护少数族裔和穷人的利益，可他们不是执政党，不能决定减税和加税，这也会形成有效的牵制作用。
这是买彩票的问题，买是买了，中不中那可就不知道了。中了六合彩以后的美妙，总是要描述一下的啊，哈哈，当个笑话听巴。
这个六合彩要有很多情况碰在一起。
1，保守党必须获得少数当选，铁杆保守党员们会在心里骂我的。他们心里会说，我们明明要争取多数当选呀，你怎么咒我们当选少数政府？
1，哈勃太空望远镜是个伟大的不以成败论英雄的政治家。他是不是？我们地球联盟党员自然知道，而且我们地球联盟党员也从来不隐瞒自己的观点，但是我现在不说。他必须能够做到联合自己的对手自由党，不以成败论英雄。
2，必须有一部分选民一致认同这主意，正好能够团结一致地在NDP和自由党之间玩跷跷板，让他们乐一乐。
2，自由党的马大拿们一旦发现跷跷板把自己压下去了，就愿意和保守党联合。自由党的铁杆党员也可能骂我呀。
华人只有3%，自己考虑做得到做不到巴？哈哈。这样，大约俺就不会挨骂了。
84.5%和90%，你够"流氓".
给你看一个CIA的网站: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ca.html
注意这句话: Canada enjoys a substantial trade surplus with its principal trading partner, the United States, which absorbs more than 85% of Canadian exports.
- 注册
- 2003-03-09
- 消息
- 7,349
- 荣誉分数
- 1,027
- 声望点数
- 373
Sure, there is no way to complete stop the corruption, but there is always the way to reduce them. Liberal is in power for too long and there are lots of relations between politicians and lobbists. These relations should be cleaned a bit.
America indeed spent a lot of money and lost lots of lives in Iraq. But not all the country participating that do. Many countries just have a small amount of troops there. I guess even if Canada is part of them, its troop there will be in the hundreds at most.
Whether to be in Iraq or not not is used by liberal government to scare the people. Canada has troop in Afganistan to fight the terrorists, so if terriorists want to attack Canada, they can do it anyway, don't have to wait for Canadian troop in Iraq.
Canada indeed has to keep a good relation with US as its Canada's neighbour and has the largest trade between each other. Pure politics won't last forever, as people's jobs really matter the most.
Also please remember that Bush won't be in power in US forever, there will be more moderate leaders appearing in US. So vote for conservative don't equal to vote for Bush.
you know, in fact your idea goes on the very same flow of thinking that you are criticising aginst.
"因为这样就要继续支持一个已经腐败的党，这和你一贯对老共的支持，属于一种思维方式。" --- The underlining ideas are the same based on the same assumption and perception that the world is to be divided into 2 sides. (black or white, hence liberal/tory) Only this time you found liberals is to be blamed as "the Black".
Again, my point is:" please stop the kind of essentialist general assumption that you are trying to impose here. Your essentialist ideas on this coming election only can lead to an irresponsible, irrational or "rational"( if you want to call it)
, shortsighted and over-generalised/over-simplified overview, which in fact is not the one, neither politically "correct" nor intellectually inspired. 最初由 Kurt 发布
you know, in fact your idea goes on the very same flow of thinking that you are criticising aginst.
"因为这样就要继续支持一个已经腐败的党，这和你一贯对老共的支持，属于一种思维方式。" --- The underlining ideas are the same based on the same assumption and perception that the world is to be divided into 2 sides. (black or white, hence liberal/tory) Only this time you found liberals is to be blamed as "the Black".
Again, my point is:" please stop the kind of essentialist general assumption that you are trying to impose here. Your essentialist ideas on this coming election only can lead to an irresponsible, irrational or "rational"( if you want to call it)
读着真累。总之了，你的意思是说，投保守党的选民都是 irresponsible, irrational，shortsighted and over-generalised/over-simplified。
