请教:LCD TV

x8h258

知名会员
注册
2007-01-29
消息
160
荣誉分数
3
声望点数
178
BOXING DAY想搞台LCD电视回来。有三个问题想请教:

1- 尺寸大小。我家的沙发与TV的距离是3.3米,买42"还是46"比较合适?我朋友家的沙发与TV的距离也是3.3米。她买46"我在她家看了半个小时,觉得有点头晕。她说看一阵就习惯了。

2 - 牌子 SONY, Samsung, LG, Sharp, or Toshiba.

3 - 60 Hz vs 120 Hz vs 240 Hz., 价格上的区别到是不小, 视觉效果上的区别大吗?

谢谢!
 
1) 42 inches
http://www.dtvcity.com/lcdtv/lcdscreensize.html

2) Samsung ->>SONY->>Sharp->>LG->>Toshiba

Sony用的是Samsung面板;Sharp曾出现过banding问题

3)这个比较复杂,难于用一句话说清楚。而且不同品牌,或同一品牌不同型号用的技术也不一样。视觉效果还与信号源有关。抛开这些,一般来说刷新频率高的比低的好。但很多都是市场宣传。

我家有三台平板电视,两个LCD一个Plasma的。对比之下,看电视和blu-say光盘,Plasma的效果最好。LCD的颜色不行。当然,如果你不对比,LCD的也还凑合。LED的不错,但目前价格还太贵,等一等买比较合算。Costco新进了一款Vizio的55寸LED电视,在美国比较流行,价格不错,很想再买一个。http://www.costco.ca/Browse/Product...=0&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&Nty=1&topnav=&s=1
 
3.3 is about 10FT, suggest 47inch, 52inch is also ok if you prefer theater feeling when watching movie.

brand-wise, agree with upstairs.

240Hz is really good.

LED is better than LCD for sure. I am using plasma, I watch movie only, I like it very much.
 
不差钱的话,就买个Samsung led,那个效果超级好!想省银子就买个Vizio,实惠,质量也过得硬,去年美国销量第一。

俺喜欢大的,3.3米,我看最少46寸

60hz,120hz, 240hz见仁见智啦。有好多人很敏感,能看出区别啦,尤其是sport fan,频率高很重要。楼主可以到best buy,futureshop的电视前好好感脚一下。然后在做决定。

人和人不一样,都说lcd是趋势,但我怎么感觉都是plasma的颜色鲜艳。
 
性价比最合适的是Samsung 60Hz,Sony技术还真是落后了,显得笨重。42”和46”价钱差不多。
 
不差钱的话,就买个Samsung led,那个效果超级好!想省银子就买个Vizio,实惠,质量也过得硬,去年美国销量第一。

俺喜欢大的,3.3米,我看最少46寸

60hz,120hz, 240hz见仁见智啦。有好多人很敏感,能看出区别啦,尤其是sport fan,频率高很重要。楼主可以到best buy,futureshop的电视前好好感脚一下。然后在做决定。

人和人不一样,都说lcd是趋势,但我怎么感觉都是plasma的颜色鲜艳。

电视不是越大越好,还是要根据人体工程学,按照自己家放电视的观看距离确定为好。要影院效果,和视觉冲击力,最好是用投影仪。买投影仪一定要买1080P的。我就犯过错误,先买了一个便宜的1024x768的,发现不行,所以又买了一个1080P的。建家庭影院,音响系统很费钱,预算中要考虑好。:flaming:
 
三星比起Sony 的技术落后不知道多少代了。。
 
3.3 is about 10FT, suggest 47inch, 52inch is also ok if you prefer theater feeling when watching movie.

brand-wise, agree with upstairs.

240Hz is really good.

LED is better than LCD for sure. I am using plasma, I watch movie only, I like it very much.
正确,应当选择52的。
 
1) 42 inches
http://www.dtvcity.com/lcdtv/lcdscreensize.html

2) Samsung ->>SONY->>Sharp->>LG->>Toshiba

Sony用的是Samsung面板;Sharp曾出现过banding问题
同等价位的话应当是Samsung = LG > Toshiba > Sharp > Sony。
同等型号的话应当是Samsung >> LG > Toshiba > Sony > Sharp.
在LCD领域,很难有对手可以赶上Samsung了,面板高档,软件一流,图像处理器超快,价格紧盯LG。
大多数倭商还沉浸在CRT的成功之中,至今没有回过味来,在电视领域,倭货要赶超只有靠下一代的LED了,就目前进度来看,仅少数倭商在LED上略有优势,但前景悬得很。LED的关键是软件,这对中国来说是机遇,对倭货来说是梦魇。
国货则: 没有面板,尽管各地在拼命上面板线,但投产就落后的局面是无可改变的;软件几乎无任何优势和特长;处理器能慢就慢,价格居高不下,前途的没有。
 
电视不是越大越好,还是要根据人体工程学,按照自己家放电视的观看距离确定为好。要影院效果,和视觉冲击力,最好是用投影仪。买投影仪一定要买1080P的。我就犯过错误,先买了一个便宜的1024x768的,发现不行,所以又买了一个1080P的。建家庭影院,音响系统很费钱,预算中要考虑好。:flaming:

well, most of people are referring to family room when they talk about this kinda distance. so I don't think projector is a good choice here. But I agree with you that 1080P is a must for projector and it costs money. Better set it up in the basement.
 
LCD TV

我认为你家的环境适合用42“—50"大小尺寸的等离子技术的平板电视机。看长时间电视眼不晕。
 
正确,应当选择52的。

(1)You are right.
The distance from screen to eyes not less than twice tv size is OK, so 3.3m = 130", then maximum tv size is 65". I do think 65" is too big, 52" should be best choice.

(2)牌子 Samsung:
comparing the parameters, you would find power consumption and dynamic contrast ratio are a lot better than other brands, the rest functions are similar.

(3)60 Hz vs 120 Hz vs 240 Hz:
I have no sense about this, I choose 60HZ. By the way,so far the best price for Samsung 52" LCD (550 series) I found at Futureshop was $1199.99.
 
不懂英文,所以,英文贴子直接忽略。

电视屏幕尺寸的选取,有很多考虑因素,但最重要的一个,是要自己感觉看得清楚,舒适。

从技术上来说,HDTV屏幕尺寸只要小于观看距离1.5倍,就不影响观看质量,即不会看到“点阵”,是光滑清晰的图像,因此,3.3米距离看86英寸屏幕的电视也可以。但是,这个不是最佳尺寸。这个尺寸的屏幕看静止画面可以,但看体育,动作,爆炸等大动态范围,迅速移动,明暗剧烈变化,或者大局部缩放画面(比如电影中的蒙泰奇),就会让人感觉不舒服,甚至头晕恶心。最佳尺寸42英寸,是根据人体工程学确定的舒适尺寸。但如果你看运动缓慢的影片较多比如风景片,而不是体育和动作片,那么尺寸选大的也无不可。还是要根据个人具体情况。
 
Ask: What are other cost besides LCD and Home theatre?

1. I just saw somebody said setting up home theatre is expensive than we expected, any reason?

2. Did anyone know what's rough cost of installing (not mounting to the wall) and wiring the LCD and Home Theatre?

3. Is extended waranty necessary? Personally, I think 1-year waranty would be enough. However, someone said it is very easy to have problems. Repairs are quite often and costly, at least 600 or 700 bucks. My other coworker said they would add extended waranty as the technology of TV keeps updating and changing. It would not be worthwhile to do so.

Any comments on these questions would be highly appreciated!
 
Futureshop will .................. this weekend with 120Hz. Sure thing 240Hz will be best, but the price will double.

此乃谣言. 不好意思
 
后退
顶部