考虑买SUV,请给意见

CR-V
2.0L 166 hp (124 kW) at 5,800 rpm and 161 lb·ft (218 N·m)

RAV4
3.5L 273 PS (201 kW; 269 hp)@6200, 333 N·m (246 lb·ft)@4700
2.5L 181 PS (133 kW; 179 hp)@6000, 233 N·m (172 ft·lbf)@4000

Q5
2.0T 211 PS (155 kW; 208 hp)@4300-6000, 350 N·m (258 ft·lbf)@1500-4200
3.2L 270 PS (199 kW; 266 hp)@6500, 330 N·m (243 ft·lbf)@3000-5000

I have two questions:
1. Is Q5 using Octane number 91 gas, i.e. premium. A 2.0 Litre engine can generate 208 hp??. If that is the case, using 91 gas vs 87 would mean additional of at least 15 cents per litre.
2. Price tag for each of the above cars.

How about Forester? and Tribeca?

Thanks
 
I have two questions:
1. Is Q5 using Octane number 91 gas, i.e. premium. A 2.0 Litre engine can generate 208 hp??. If that is the case, using 91 gas vs 87 would mean additional of at least 15 cents per litre.
2. Price tag for each of the above cars.

How about Forester? and Tribeca?

Thanks

呃, 也不能这么算吧。
2.0T我的经验是8L/100km, 确实是91的油, 好油才有好性能嘛~ 马力大是因为有Turbo。

Subaru应该不要求91。 Forester确实是同级比较出众的。
 
The "RESALE" value of a car decides its LEASE amount. You have to also consider how much you have to pay to BUY back the car after lease.

Lease is something for those who find FINANCING too high. When you tell car sales person FINANCIAL is too high, they will suggest you an option, LEASE. But do remember, after your lease, you DON'T own the car. After your financing, you own the car.

If you plan to lease a car, the best is American car, there should be NO problem for the first three years, but reliability is always the problem of American cars. Problems problems problems after five years, and the maintenance fee just sky-rocketing.

Japanese car, they are reliable! In cold winter time, you can find most cars have problem (like cannot start, engine problem) on the street are American cars.

If you have a reliable Japanese car which you only pay four years of financing, that, in ten years time, is cheaper than you go for LEASING 2.5 times (four year lease term).

Matrix 2.4 version has AWD

But Forester is the best among that price range (RAV 4, CRV)

不好意思, 昨天稀里糊涂的写成LEASE了, 其实我说的是FINANCE 5年3.9%, 这是他们网站的价格, 不知道去DEALERSHIP会不会有改变. 我是从来没有买过车的人, 不知道买车的那些规矩...
 
讨论变得好专业, 看不懂....
 
I have two questions:
1. Is Q5 using Octane number 91 gas, i.e. premium. A 2.0 Litre engine can generate 208 hp??. If that is the case, using 91 gas vs 87 would mean additional of at least 15 cents per litre.
2. Price tag for each of the above cars.

How about Forester? and Tribeca?

Thanks

Honda S2000 的F20C,10年前的2升NA机头就有240hp。要想功率大,拔转速+T就完了。问题是大家日常开车中有多少机会用到最大功率?恐怕上3000转都不多,况且功率是保证车速而不是加速的。所以现行4缸2.5升左右的机头
,对小型CUV来说功率都够了。

加91是压缩比高的缘故。1L贵1毛多钱,一年多花200块顶天了,这个钱在欧洲车比日本车以后多花的养护费用中几乎是看不见的。
 
现在去大统华一看,一堆人开Q5,中国人真是,说Q5好,马上都买Q5了,没个性了.
 
Honda S2000 的F20C,10年前的2升NA机头就有240hp。要想功率大,拔转速+T就完了。问题是大家日常开车中有多少机会用到最大功率?恐怕上3000转都不多,况且功率是保证车速而不是加速的。所以现行4缸2.5升左右的机头
,对小型CUV来说功率都够了。

加91是压缩比高的缘故。1L贵1毛多钱,一年多花200块顶天了,这个钱在欧洲车比日本车以后多花的养护费用中几乎是看不见的。

S2000的发动机比较特殊吧。
我赞奥迪的2.0T主要是因为扭矩值在1500转就到高峰, 实际使用中非常实用。
 
30K+: Forester AWD / santa fe AWD40K+: TIGUAN 2.0t50K+: Q5 2.0T
 
santa Fe: 8000KM/ main. about $70-80, require 87# gas TIGUAN 16000KM/main. $155 require 91# gas for best performance, 89# gas is acceptable.
 
最重要的当然是安全, 然后是空间, 我们不需要什么动力(当然也要够OTTAWA的冬天用), 基本上就是在城市里开所以也不需要什么越野

总言之就是可以安全地载着两个孩子在OTTAWA的冬天开来开去,后备箱is compatible with a family of 4的车


上次回复以后就没再上来,不好意思。不过大家的积极性都很高,讨论得很热烈,也是好事。

如果搂住的预算是裸车税前三万左右,根据楼主的需求,安全〉空间〉动力〉越野

我会推荐 VW Tiguan 动力澎湃,科技含量高, 空间略显不足
Ford Escape 很均衡,员工价折扣 太均衡,没特点
Subaru Forester 全市四驱,水平对置, 变速箱技术落伍
GM Equinox/Terrain 全新设计,欧洲平台, 做工略显粗糙

Rav 4 和 Crv 除了日本车的经济适用性之外,没什么好推荐的

希望对搂住有所帮助
 
现在去大统华一看,一堆人开Q5,中国人真是,说Q5好,马上都买Q5了,没个性了.


Q5 不再楼主考虑的范畴之内,可以另外开贴讨论。

但是大统华的停车位,我掰着手指头数,算上那里的业主和员工,Q5 不会超过5台。和华人圈里满眼望去的corolla, civic, camry, accord, rav 4, crv 比起来应该不算什么。应该是这位朋友也很关注这款车,再加上LED 车灯格外亮眼,所以印象深刻罢了。另外这也是一个心理暗示现象,大家是否发现当你在关注某一款车或者什么东西的时候,会发现他格外的入眼,视觉重复率很高,所以感觉到处都是。

有关于Q5 的问题欢迎和我联系。这里讨论楼主的需求,我推荐,Tiguan, Forester, Suzuki。
 
CRV 有2.0吗? 只见过2.4的。188 HP.
现在油价不能不说是个考虑的因素.算过
5年 9L/100km 和 11.5/100km比较,
好几千的差别.

On the other hand, 有钱和有需要的
话还是买马力大的SUV. That's for fun,
not for life :)
 
上次回复以后就没再上来,不好意思。不过大家的积极性都很高,讨论得很热烈,也是好事。

如果搂住的预算是裸车税前三万左右,根据楼主的需求,安全〉空间〉动力〉越野

我会推荐 VW Tiguan 动力澎湃,科技含量高, 空间略显不足
Ford Escape 很均衡,员工价折扣 太均衡,没特点
Subaru Forester 全市四驱,水平对置, 变速箱技术落伍
GM Equinox/Terrain 全新设计,欧洲平台, 做工略显粗糙

Rav 4 和 Crv 除了日本车的经济适用性之外,没什么好推荐的

希望对搂住有所帮助

Forester我试过。。还真是这个问题。。。低rpm hp/torque感觉很充足。。可是到80-120冲刺的时候感觉会有明显的lag。。。
 
后退
顶部