就事论事:咱村居民不该投保守党

[cmah]

离选举揭盅不到一天了. 看大家讨论兴致高昂, 忍不住也来说两句.

大家知道保守党一直是主张小政府的. 前两年政府扩招是保守党应对百年金融危机的权宜之计. 保守党的竞选纲领已经明确表明要压缩政府开支. 至于如何实现, 是自然减员, 或者是裁员其实并不重要. 但是联邦公务员队伍缩小是必然的.
.

俺也不是公务员...

按人均工作四十年算, 每年有2.5%的人退休... 不招新人, 四年下来, 自然减员5-7%应该没问题.

 

[第N个马甲]

小政府，连employee的budget都不够，哪来的钱雇 contractor?

I was wondering too

 

[forward]

Different pool

I was wondering too

Some long-term contracts are from different pool. Say this year the ratio 50% vs 50%, next year could be 48% vs 52%. The biggest challenging for government is to maintain the pension payment, it is becoming harder now with retirement waves from babyboomer.

Small government has to outsource some tasks to consulting companies. Small government does not gurantee efficiency, but risk is smaller compared to big government. Also small government encourages/force more people to stay in private.

I foresee my contract work under PC ideology.

 

[第N个马甲]

政府又是靠谁养着？

这是一个食物链

 

[uestcca101]

Some long-term contracts are from different pool. Say this year the ratio 50% vs 50%, next year could be 48% vs 52%. The biggest challenging for government is to maintain the pension payment, it is becoming harder now with retirement waves from babyboomer.

Small government has to outsource some tasks to consulting companies. Small government does not gurantee efficiency, but risk is smaller compared to big government. Also small government encourages/force more people to stay in private.

I foresee my contract work under PC ideology.

Small government 指的是budget减少。 现在政府那么多人，不裁员的话，养活他们都难不会再开新的project了。再说很多的project都是可有可无的。 project 都没了还谈什么outsource？
每次政府减budget先砍的就是contractor 和 TERM。

 

[第N个马甲]

Small government 指的是budget减少。 现在政府那么多人，不裁员的话，养活他们都难不会再开新的project了。再说很多的project都是可有可无的。 project 都没了还谈什么outsource？
每次政府减budget先砍的就是contractor 和 TERM。

exactly

 

[wiiwii]

I was wondering too

不对不对,contractor的budget和PERM AND TERM 的budget是不同的,先砍TERM是肯定的,不过可以contractor的形式再弄回来,不同之出是帐面漂亮了,其实付出更多的钱:blowzy:

 

[Felixmao]

只选保守党。。。

 

[第N个马甲]

不对不对,contractor的budget和PERM AND TERM 的budget是不同的,先砍TERM是肯定的,不过可以contractor的形式再弄回来,不同之出是帐面漂亮了,其实付出更多的钱:blowzy:

先砍TERM? then I am done for

 

[wiiwii]

先砍TERM? then I am done for

讲老实话，就算ＣＯＮ　是ＭＡＪＯＲＩＴＹ也不会裁人的，退休的ＢＡＢＹＢＯＯＭ太多了．ＣＯＮ冻结了每年工资的涨幅，如果从那点小利看，全体公务员应该都不选ＣＯＮ，但是，如果加拿大经济完了，别说这点小钱，大家都要过苦日子了．所以我还是选ＣＯＮ

 

[第N个马甲]

讲老实话，就算ＣＯＮ　是ＭＡＪＯＲＩＴＹ也不会裁人的，退休的ＢＡＢＹＢＯＯＭ太多了．ＣＯＮ冻结了每年工资的涨幅，如果从那点小利看，全体公务员应该都不选ＣＯＮ，但是，如果加拿大经济完了，别说这点小钱，大家都要过苦日子了．所以我还是选ＣＯＮ

不过真正的问题是，你何以见得CON把加拿大的经济搞好？ it was surplus under liberal. now it's deficit under CON. remember Con was aganist the regulations...if they had their way, we could be in as deep economic trouble as the u.s now...

 

[wiiwii]

你不听PSAC的话:flaming:

ＵＮＩＯＮ我没有好感，如果他们要罢工当然我也没办法．

 

[第N个马甲]

ＵＮＩＯＮ我没有好感，如果他们要罢工当然我也没办法．

开玩笑的。。。

其实我觉得public funded 的 或许根本就不应该有union... 因为那是纳税人的钱

 

[wiiwii]

不过真正的问题是，你何以见得CON把加拿大的经济搞好？ it was surplus under liberal. now it's deficit under CON. remember Con was aganist the regulations...if they had their way, we could be in as deep economic trouble as the u.s now...

大道理可以讲三天三夜，就讲简单的吧，在ＣＯＮ的领导下，在特大金融危机面前，加拿大在发达国家里表现最好．赤字？哪个国家不是投了大量的钱？其他国家赤字了，经济还是一团糟．这就是区别

 

[第N个马甲]

大道理可以讲三天三夜，就讲简单的吧，在ＣＯＮ的领导下，在特大金融危机面前，加拿大在发达国家里表现最好．赤字？哪个国家不是投了大量的钱？其他国家赤字了，经济还是一团糟．这就是区别

问题是， 是什么原因造成金融危机？？？

if you know this, then you would know exactly why we shouldn't vote for con