The chance to win is the same. Nothing has changed.
很多时候没有遇到类似的挫折,并非精明,只是幸运而已。
感觉MINTO的做法,和商家打折促销有一拼。
一件商品,先涨60%,变成"原价",再大张旗鼓地降50%,让买家以为捡了个大便宜。
LZ现在的诉求已经比当初MINTO的OFFER低了。即使赢了,MONTO也没输。就此宣称胜利,有点勉强。MINTO先没收了定金,然后让LZ很费力地去讨。这样,一旦讨回定金,LZ就会有成就感。实际上即使MINTO一并赔偿了其它损失,LZ才只是回到原点。
无论如何,减少损失是目的,达到就好。望LZ的生活早日回归正轨。
赢的标准定为要回定金,又不计其中的成本,最终宣布自己胜利,应该很有可能。
我估计,最终结果是,双方都宣称自己赢了。
双赢 is a very good goal.
双赢不是双方都宣称自己赢了。
The chance to win is the same. Nothing has changed.
I mean win-win. Not both sides declare win independently.
请你给出一个可能的win-win的结果。
经过半年,甚至更长时间的折腾,楼主要回定金,是win-win吗?
what's your point? do you think bdw should give up and minto should keep her deposit?
win for minto is to build up its reputation and gain happy customers.
win for bdw is up to her own judgment. she should get what she think it's fair for her. if her goal is to get back the deposit, that's her win if minto returns it back to her, no matter it takes half year or longer. if she gives up now, she is definitely lost. is this what you want to see, right?
前面无数人说过无数遍了:性格决定命运。
我只是想"事先"知道楼主一方输赢的标准,我也好在事情结束的时候,帮着庆祝一下。
我不希望楼主放弃自己的钱,同时我也不希望楼主继续被你当枪使,你已经拿楼主当枪使了很久了。
你还是没有回答我的问题:
- 经过半年,甚至更长时间的折腾,楼主要回定金,是win-win吗?
- 经过半年,甚至更长时间的折腾,楼主"用定金再买一个房子",是win-win吗?