BDW不是发帖邀请有兴趣的网友看原始文件吗?您这么关心此事怎么没去看一下原始文件?百猜不如一见吗!劳您大驾亲临一阅,一切不都结了吗?要不让BDW 把原始文件送到您的府上?
我没那么大的热情到要亲自去BDW那里看,我不是陪审团的,我的观点不重要
我是看BDW的视频,给她提点建议, 更有说服力一些,是另外一种帮助(还是那句话帮助的热情也没那么大,没到要亲自出面的地步,因为我感觉BDW不会采纳我的建议)
目前,从大中报看到的Minto的意见,核心是两个,很巧就是我最早第一次在BDW帖子里明确提出的2点
1〉 Minto卖的就是 As Is的房子, 不是完整版的
2〉 BDW没按时签文件,是违约
但是Minto否认施的律师的指控,声称按照合同出售给施的住宅户型与已经建成的住宅别无二致。
But Minto denies the allegations from Shi’s lawyer, stating that the home dwelling it sold to Shi under the APS was exactly the same one it has built.
Minto的律师在回复给施的律师的信中称:“Minto建造了缩水版的住宅户型,出售的也正是这一住宅户型。Minto的立场是,建造的住宅就是按照合同出售的住宅。他在信中强调, 购房者没有购买标准的Yorkville户型,Minto也没有向他们出售这种户型。”
“Minto built a reduced nook dwelling and that is what it sold,” Minto’s lawyer responded to Shi’s counsel in a letter. “And Minto’s position is that the dwelling which was constructed was the specific dwelling which was sold under the APS.” The letter asserts that Shi did not purchase a standard Yorkville model, and that Minto did not sell her such a model.
“你的客户简签的草图并不是合同的组成部分……你的客户在签订合同之前,在销售代表在场的情况下已经全面看过住宅全貌,包括厨房……显然,这些房间的面积从未被改动过。”
“The sketch your client initialled was not part of the APS… Your client fully inspected the dwelling itself, including the kitchen… prior to signing the APS, in the presence of the sales representative, and it would have been obvious that the rooms were the size they are.”
Minto在信中进一步指出,施在交割时违约,因为她“没有在交割当日完成转账和签署所有交割文件”。
Minto further indicated in the letter that it considered Shi in breach of contract, as she “failed to transfer funds and close on the closing date”.