Papadopoulos被判刑(获特朗普总统特赦), Cohen入狱三年, Manafort获刑7.5年、Gates, Flynn, Patten认罪, Roger Stone获刑40个月;Flynn、Manafort、Stone获特朗普总统特赦; Steve Bannon、纳瓦罗被判四个月监禁

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间
‘A bomb on Trump’s front porch’: FBI’s Cohen raids hit home for the president
By Philip Rucker, Josh Dawsey and Robert Costa By Philip Rucker, Josh Dawsey and Robert Costa Email the author
Politics
April 9 at 8:16 PM

President Trump has howled in all caps for nearly a year as the Justice Department has delved deeper and deeper into his orbit. Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III indicted his former campaign chairman. Then he secured a guilty plea from his former national security adviser. All the while, Mueller and his investigators have spent hours questioning White House officials about whether the president had sought to obstruct justice.

But the FBI’s seizure on Monday of privileged communications between Trump and his private lawyer, Michael D. Cohen — as well as documents related to a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, the adult-film actress who has alleged a sexual affair with Trump — was a particularly extraordinary move that opens a whole new front in the converging legal battles ensnaring the administration.

Cohen is Trump’s virtual vault — the keeper of his secrets, from his business deals to his personal affairs — and the executor of his wishes.

“This search warrant is like dropping a bomb on Trump’s front porch,” said Joyce White Vance, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama.

Mark S. Zaid, a Washington lawyer, said the seizure of Cohen’s records “should be the most concerning for the president.”

“You can’t get much worse than this, other than arresting someone’s wife or putting pressure on a family member,” he said. “This strikes at the inner sanctum: your lawyer, your CPA, your barber, your therapist, your bartender. All the people who would know the worst about you.”

The president spent much of Monday afternoon glued to the television. Aides said Trump watched cable news coverage of surprise raids on Cohen’s Manhattan office, home and hotel room by FBI agents, who took the lawyer’s computer, phone and personal financial records after a referral from Mueller.

As the sun began to fall in Washington, Trump offered reporters his initial reaction: “It’s a disgraceful situation.”

“I have this witch hunt constantly going on,” Trump said. “That is a whole new level of unfairness,” he added, leaving no doubt that he views Monday’s actions as a personal affront. Trump called Cohen “a good man” and went on to criticize Attorney General Jeff Sessions, saying he had made “a very terrible mistake for the country” by recusing himself from the Russia probe.

Asked why he had not fired Mueller, Trump left the door open. “We’ll see what happens,” he told reporters. “Many people have said, ‘You should fire him,’ ” the president added.

Shortly after the raids began Monday morning, Trump received a heads-up at the White House. He huddled in the Oval Office with Ty Cobb, the White House lawyer who oversees its handling of the Mueller probe, as well as with White House counsel Donald McGahn and White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, officials said.

Other aides said they did not understand what was happening and struggled to pinpoint the significance of the seizures. Many officials sought to keep their distance from the developments, deferring comment until a strategy was determined.

Aides said they viewed Trump’s late-afternoon comments to reporters as a necessary venting session. He had been grousing privately about Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein, a Trump appointee who oversees the Mueller investigation because of Sessions’s recusal.

He complained about Rosenstein again Monday in private, a White House adviser said, and stewed all afternoon about the warrant to seize Cohen’s records, at times raising his voice. Trump said that Rosenstein approved the warrant, that he wished Rosenstein was not in the job and there was no one making the prosecutors follow the rules, the adviser said. Trump complained sharply about Sessions and Mueller and asked detailed questions about who was behind the move — and said that people would be more critical of such a warrant if it wasn’t intended to damage the president.

Still, a senior White House official said late Monday that no “imminent” personnel changes were expected.

It was unclear if Trump talked to Cohen, with whom he recently dined at Mar-a-Lago, the president’s private club in Palm Beach, Fla.

Trump “won’t like that Cohen is in the crosshairs, but you have to remember: He’d prefer the heat be on Cohen than on him,” said one of the president’s advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share a candid assessment. “His goal will be to figure out how much vulnerability he has.”

This was Trump’s first crisis without Hope Hicks, the recently departed White House communications director who knew her way around the broader Trump orbit, getting to the bottom of what was happening, counseling the president and intuiting how he would want the situation handled.

Trump also navigated Monday’s turn without a full slate of legal advisers. He has yet to replace John Dowd, who resigned last month as his personal attorney in the Russia matter. Reached briefly Monday afternoon, one White House official sighed when asked about Trump’s strategy, pointing to the “evident” limitations of the current legal team, as well as the absence so far of a public-relations plan to counter the hotly anticipated release next week of former FBI director James B. Comey’s memoir, “A Higher Loyalty.”

There was fear in Trump’s orbit that the president is liable to erupt in anger in coming days, escalating his attacks against Mueller at a time when his attorneys are negotiating a possible interview. And there was concern in some quarters that Trump, who has been shaking up his administration in recent weeks, may also seek to terminate Mueller.

Former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, a friend of Trump, called the Cohen raids “a little heavy-handed.”

“Is this surprising? Yes,” said Giuliani, also a former U.S. attorney. “Is it extraordinary? No. This is the way prosecutors get information — sometimes to convict and prosecute, sometimes to exculpate.”

Criticizing Mueller for veering into “highly personal issues,” such as the alleged Daniels encounter, Giuliani added, “The only thing that’s happening, perhaps, is that Mueller is trying to compel the president to testify.”

Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One last week that he did not know Cohen had arranged the $130,000 payment for Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, just days before the 2016 election to prevent her from publicly speaking about her alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump.

The president said he did not know where Cohen got the money and declined to answer whether he had set up a fund for Cohen to use. “You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen,” Trump said. “Michael’s my attorney, and you’ll have to ask Michael.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders has said repeatedly that Trump denies Clifford’s allegations.

Without a lead attorney in Dowd’s absence, Trump has absorbed some advice from a number of legal commentators on cable news, including Alan Dershowitz, a retired Harvard Law School professor who has made supportive comments about the president.

“This may mark the end of the kind of cooperation that Trump’s lawyers have been involved with,” Dershowitz said Monday in an interview. “Cooperation doesn’t seem to have much payback. Maybe it’s better to go into a defensive fight mode.”

Dershowitz advised Trump to use “every legal tactic available to him” to fight Mueller and the FBI. He said the president could “assert” his rights as Cohen’s client and “go into court and seek to demand returned every bit of information that is arguably lawyer-client privilege before anybody has a chance to read anything.”

Tim O’Brien, author of the Trump biography “Trump Nation,” said the seizure of records from his private attorney probably would “smell of a mortal threat” by Trump. And, O’Brien added, “He is historically prone not to sit back and let the chips fall where they may. He is historically prone to come out with guns blazing.”

Cohen has long been a fixer for Trump, as well as his family and business, and associates said he was disappointed when he was not brought officially on board the campaign, and again when he was passed over for a coveted White House job.

“He’s done the dirty work that the president hasn’t wanted to do himself, and he’s been doing it for a decade,” O’Brien said.

In the early weeks of the administration, Cohen was spotted unshaven, roaming the lobby of the Trump International Hotel in Washington. He has stayed in touch with the president through late-night phone calls.

But now, Cohen is back squarely in Trump’s orbit — though perhaps not in the way he had hoped to be. Cohen himself has become the kind of distraction that he was usually tasked with handling for his boss.

“When it comes to Michael Cohen, anything is possible,” said Louise Sunshine, a former Trump Organization executive who knows Cohen. “Anything and everything is possible.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d8138a26e7ec


这是大事。

川普没早点解雇穆勒是个大错误。

对比一下,知道克林顿夫妇秘密的人很多神秘死亡。
 
这是大事。

川普没早点解雇穆勒是个大错误。

解雇穆勒将是个天大的错误。你以为他不想?
 
这是大事。

川普没早点解雇穆勒是个大错误。

对比一下,知道克林顿夫妇秘密的人很多神秘死亡。
川朴总统进退两难。
本来承认艳星交往丝毫不会影响总统个人在支持者中的声望以及个人支持度,可偏偏有个支票问题涉及影响大选结果。 于是忍着不提艳星并否认知情支票,这下律师可倒霉了。 律师会不会为了美国再次伟大个人一肩扛下呢?我看悬,:D 有这智商的话早就提着麻袋现金去封口了。
我要是川粉,一不作二不休,也动员10女星超模告川普性骚,用散焦的方式把这个纸牌肥皂剧给水了。:monster:
 
川朴总统进退两难。
本来承认艳星交往丝毫不会影响总统个人在支持者中的声望以及个人支持度,可偏偏有个支票问题涉及影响大选结果。 于是忍着不提艳星并否认知情支票,这下律师可倒霉了。 律师会不会为了美国再次伟大个人一肩扛下呢?我看悬,:D 有这智商的话早就提着麻袋现金去封口了。
我要是川粉,一不作二不休,也动员10女星超模告川普性骚,用散焦的方式把这个纸牌肥皂剧给水了。:monster:


upload_2018-4-10_12-33-43.png


upload_2018-4-10_12-34-21.png




https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/opinions/raid-on-michael-cohen-office-callan/index.html
 
@ccc 村长,开个赌局吧? 赌赌穆勒能不能撑到这个周末? :monster:
@uglyducking @2018 @小地主 @向问天 我赌川普必须开掉他。:evil: 生可肯熟不可肯。。我还赌开掉穆勒后川普还是总统。:evil:
 
@ccc 村长,开个赌局吧? 赌赌穆勒能不能撑到这个周末? :monster:
@uglyducking @2018 @小地主 @向问天 我赌川普必须开掉他。:evil: 生可肯熟不可肯。。我还赌开掉穆勒后川普还是总统。:evil:

来了....

upload_2018-4-10_17-48-41.png


(CNN) Less than 24 hours removed from Donald Trump musing that "many people" have told him he should fire special counsel Robert Mueller, Sarah Sanders made clear that that the White House has researched such a move and believes Trump has the ability to do it.

"He certainly believes he has the power to do so," the White House press secretary said of the President's ability to fire Mueller. "We've been advised that the President certainly has the power to make that decision."

That. Is. A. Big. Deal.

Think about what Sanders is saying here. She is saying that that White House has sought out guidance as to whether Trump can fire the special counsel. And concluded that he can.

1. That conclusion goes against the Code of Federal Regulations governing how and who can fire a special counsel.
The code says this:

"The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies. The Attorney General shall inform the Special Counsel in writing of the specific reason for his or her removal."

That seems very, very clear.

"The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General" doesn't appear to leave a ton of wiggle room.

Remember that former President Richard Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre" refers to the resignations of the attorney general and the deputy attorney general because they weren't willing to fire special counsel Archibald Cox. Nixon eventually turned to Solicitor General Robert Bork, who was next in line in the chain of command, who fired Cox. (And, yes, it's the same Robert Bork.)

So, even in what is widely seen as one of the biggest crises of confidence in modern government history, Nixon followed the code on how to get a special counsel fired.

2. That conclusion speaks to just how far Trump has come in terms of Mueller's job status in a very short period of time.
Remember that for months and months, Trump -- perhaps on the advice of his legal team -- never mentioned Mueller by name.
It was only March 17 when Trump first raised Mueller by name in a tweet.

That tweet read: "The Mueller probe should never have been started in that there was no collusion and there was no crime. It was based on fraudulent activities and a Fake Dossier paid for by Crooked Hillary and the DNC, and improperly used in FISA COURT for surveillance of my campaign. WITCH HUNT!"

The following day, Trump tweeted on Mueller again: "Why does the Mueller team have 13 hardened Democrats, some big Crooked Hillary supporters, and Zero Republicans? Another Dem recently added...does anyone think this is fair? And yet, there is NO COLLUSION!"

And it wasn't until Monday that we even heard Trump publicly acknowledge that some people -- ahem -- think he should fire Mueller. Now, suddenly, not only does Trump believe the Mueller probe "has gone too far" (in the words of Sanders) but he also has solicited advice on whether he can fire Mueller -- and concluded that he can.

Maybe we shouldn't be as surprised by these revelations given that The New York Times has previously reported that Trump decided to fire Mueller last summer but was talked out of it by White House counsel Donald McGahn.

But what we've learned about the research and conclusions the White House has drawn about Trump's ability to fire Mueller feels as though this is all picking up speed. And quickly.
 
upload_2018-4-10_17-52-32.png


(CNN) The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee said Tuesday that if President Donald Trump were to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, "it would be suicide."

"I think it would be suicide for the President to fire him," Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley told CNN. "I think the less the President says about this whole thing, the better off he will be. And I think Mueller is a person of stature and respected and I respect him. Just let the thing go forward."

On Monday, the FBI raided the offices and hotel room of Trump's longtime fixer and personal attorney Michael Cohen. Trump told reporters at the White House that the raid was "a disgrace," which led media to ask if the President would fire the special counsel.

"Why don't I just fire Mueller? Well, I think it's a disgrace what's going on. We'll see what happens," he said, making sure to repeat the question for the cameras. "And many people have said, you should fire him."

Other Republican senators maintained Tuesday that additional protections of Mueller's investigation aren't necessary but some GOP members offered similar warnings to Grassley's, that any move by Trump to oust Mueller would be cataclysmic for his presidency.

"I believe that Director Mueller has an important job to do, and I believe he can discharge that job in a professional and impartial sort of way," said the Senate's No. 2 Republican, John Cornyn of Texas. "So my advice to anybody would let Director Mueller do his job."
 
upload_2018-4-10_17-55-40.png


(CNN) President Donald Trump's latest tirade against Robert Mueller's investigation does not appear to have prompted many Capitol Hill Republicans to reconsider the need for legislation to protect the special counsel.

Instead, GOP lawmakers maintained Tuesday that additional protections aren't necessary all but offered a sobering warning: any move by Trump to oust Mueller would be cataclysmic for his presidency.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley told CNN, "I think it would be suicide for the President to fire him. I think the less the President says about this whole thing, the better off he will be. And I think Mueller is a person of stature and respected and I respect him."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told CNN, "I think he'll be allowed to finish his job."

"I haven't seen clear indication yet that we needed to pass something to keep him from being removed because I don't think that's going to happen," the Kentucky Republican added.

The comments from Republicans fell into a familiar pattern on Capitol Hill after Trump suggests he is contemplating taking steps to fire the special counsel. Trump's statements on several occasions have sparked a wave of Democratic calls to protect Mueller, followed by Republican warnings that Trump should absolutely not do so — but also a belief that the special counsel is already sufficiently protected and needs no further action from Congress.

While Senate Democrats huddled with party leaders on Tuesday to discuss potential responses to Trump, Senate Republicans avoided the topic altogether during their weekly party lunch.

"It didn't even come up," said Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana.

Following Monday's FBI raid related to his personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, Trump showed signs of increasing anger and his response has been to unleash -- once again -- on the Russian investigation. On Monday afternoon, Trump refused to say he wouldn't fire Mueller and Tuesday morning he tweeted that the investigation was a "witch hunt" and that "Attorney-client privilege is dead!"

"It's a disgrace, it's, frankly, a real disgrace, it's an attack on our country in a true sense. It's an attack on all we stand for," Trump told reporters at the White House Monday afternoon just as news broke of the FBI raid.

"Why don't I just fire Mueller? Well, I think it's a disgrace what's going on. We'll see what happens," Trump added. "And many people have said, you should fire him."

But members in his own party -- just as they did weeks ago -- are reluctant to intervene, saying Trump's comments don't change the fact that they don't see a need to take further action to protect Mueller.

"I believe that Director Mueller has an important job to do, and I believe he can discharge that job in a professional and impartial sort of way. So my advice to anybody would let Director Mueller do his job," said the Senate's No. 2 Republican, John Cornyn of Texas.

Pressed what he'd do if Trump acted to fire Mueller, Cornyn said, "I'm not going to speculate as to what we would do because I think there would be serious repercussions."

"It's hard to predict what that would look like. So, I think Director Mueller ought to be free to do his job and let the courts and let the lawyers work it out," Cornyn said.

Other Republicans downplayed Trump's most recent comments, arguing they didn't reveal anything new about the President's posturing against the Russia investigation.

"I think thematically he's said similar things before so I don't think that that's anything new in my opinion," Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, said.

Over and over again, Republicans insisted Trump wasn't about to fire Mueller.

"I don't think he would do that," Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst said. "There's always a possibility. He has that prerogative, but so far he's declined to do so and I think it's in his best interest if he does not."

But sources familiar tell CNN that the latest raid on Trump's personal lawyer and longtime confidant has shaken the President in new ways. Cohen had become a surrogate family member to the President, and has been spotted semi-regularly at the White House, at times meeting with Trump or dining with the first lady.

Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut predicted that the news could lead to the President being even more "impulsive and wrathful."

Last year, there were two bipartisan bills introduced in the Senate that would protect the special counsel from being fired. The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the measures in the fall, but there's been little action on the legislation since.

Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, said he would back such legislation but that it's not yet necessary.

"I would sign onto legislation that protected him, but I just don't see a lot of momentum around it," Corker said. "I think we'd be better off with (the President) knowing that it'd be a huge problem if he did something then unsuccessfully passing legislation."

Across the aisle, a Senate Democratic source told CNN that Democrats in the chamber just huddled with party leaders to talk about "what if" Trump fires Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein or Attorney General Jeff Sessions. They discussed immediately calling for document preservation and for Republicans who have been warning about this to join with them if it happens.

Sen. Chris Coons, the Delaware Democrat who co-sponsored one of the special counsel protection bills with Tillis, said legislation is "more urgent than ever" in light of Trump's comments Monday.

"I appreciate that all of my Republican colleagues appreciate the risk to the rule of law that an inappropriate, abrupt firing of the special counsel by the President would create," Coons said. "I am deeply puzzled by the lack of urgency or motivation to take some simple measured steps to address it."

Coons said he planned to speak with Tillis and Grassley soon for an update on the measure.

Tillis said the special counsel protection bills have merit, and he would still like to see them reconciled. But he noted that there were scores of predictions that Mueller's firing was imminent back in August 2017, when the bills were first introduced.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican who co-sponsored the other special counsel bill with New Jersey Democrat Sen. Cory Booker, says he'd be happy to move a bill if Grassley wants to do so. But he doesn't see an imminent need because he doesn't believe Trump will fire Mueller.

"I've talked to Trump. I think he understands the consequences," Graham said. "I think it'd be the end of his presidency, for the political chaos."
 
后退
顶部