关于难民的facts

[vanish888]

这种狗屎左棍的文章值得看吗？写出来就是误导公众欺骗屁民。
根据法律，这些人就是非法跨越边境，他们根本没有资格在加拿大申请难民。
法律的名字叫： Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement
政府官网链接： https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio.../agreements/safe-third-country-agreement.html

土豆这个吸毒的戏剧老师根本就是视法律为狗屁，你不是不可以收这些跨越美加边境的，应该先修改法律废掉Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement，那我们也无话可说。
当然，左屎左棍都是蒙面上街游行，随时打砸抢，law and order他们根本就不想遵守。

请你告诉我这个条约规定了什么，我看不懂

 

[小地主]

法律说没有visa你不能进入。
政治正确说欢迎非法入境者。

如果你觉得你理解的法律是正确的，那为什么不起诉政府？更别说你不喜欢的总理了。。

 

[冷笑十声]

如果你理解的法律是正确的，那为什么不起诉政府？更别说你不喜欢的总理了。。

我又不是律师。只是common sense

 

[他乡枫叶]

A political debate has raged over language and whether asylum seekers crossing between official points are entering Canada illegally. The term “irregular” is viewed by some as vague jargon and a euphemism. The use of “illegal” (Ontario Premier Doug Ford calls them “illegal border crossers”) is seen by others as inflammatory and dehumanizing.

Legal experts say Canada’s immigration laws are clear: “They’re not illegal border crossers,” said James Hathaway, founding director of the University of Michigan’s program in refugee and asylum law, who is Canadian, and a leading global authority on refugee law.

 

[A Special Day]

这种狗屎左棍的文章值得看吗？写出来就是误导公众欺骗屁民。
根据法律，这些人就是非法跨越边境，他们根本没有资格在加拿大申请难民。
法律的名字叫： Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement
政府官网链接： https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio.../agreements/safe-third-country-agreement.html

土豆这个吸毒的戏剧老师根本就是视法律为狗屁，你不是不可以收这些跨越美加边境的，应该先修改法律废掉Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement，那我们也无话可说。
当然，左屎左棍都是蒙面上街游行，随时打砸抢，law and order他们根本就不想遵守。

先看看专家们是怎么说的：
Why can’t Canada just turn people away at the border?

In many cases, Canada does turn people away at the border. Under the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) between Canada and the United States, in effect since 2004 as a way to address pressures on asylum systems from global migration growth, they must ask for protection in the first safe country they arrive in. This means if they come from the United States and present themselves to a Canadian border agent at a land-border port of entry as a refugee claimant, they are generally denied and sent back.

The agreement does not, however, apply to some groups, such as unaccompanied minors, nor to those who cross into Canada other than at an official border post and make an in-land claim. This is precisely why many of those seeking protection have crossed at non-designated points, rather than at an official crossing where they would be automatically directed back into the United States. In Manitoba, and especially in winter and at night, this has posed safety risks for both claimants and patrol officers who conduct search and rescue.

当然，你的解释绝对有可能比专家更准确。如果是这样，建议你challenge这些不学无术的专家.

 

[小地主]

我又不是律师。只是common sense

我也不是学law的

所以在common sense下，我不会说 “在政治正确的大前提下,一切法律都是狗屁”

 

[他乡枫叶]

小土豆可能说了一些不太适当的话。但是加拿大是法制国家，边境局才是有权利根据法律来决定谁进谁不进的。
如果连法律都被认为是狗屁，要follow common sense，那么中国才是你生活的地方。

 

[eclipse]

当然，你的解释绝对有可能比专家更准确。如果是这样，建议你challenge这些不学无术的专家.

左棍都是搅屎棍，一点都没错。
除了亿万富翁，哪个普通人有精力和金钱去法院挑战土豆党？
想想连游行都蒙着脸随时打砸抢的左棍们，大言不惭你们去告啊时，左棍们的心中是没有一丝一毫羞愧的。

 

[A Special Day]

法律说没有visa你不能进入。

Legal experts say Canada’s immigration laws are clear: “They’re not illegal border crossers,” said James Hathaway, founding director of the University of Michigan’s program in refugee and asylum law, who is Canadian, and a leading global authority on refugee law.

Internationally, Canada is signatory to the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Within Canada, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is the legislation that governs the flow of people – i.e., non-citizens who enter Canada. The legislation that governs the flow of goods into Canada is the Customs Act, which applies to everyone, citizens and non-citizens.

Article 31 of the UN refugee convention says receiving countries may not penalize refugees for how they enter a country, as long as they present themselves “without delay” to authorities and show “good cause” for their presence.

In line with international practice, Canadian law under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Section 133, says that someone who has claimed refugee protection, and is either waiting for a hearing or has been accepted as a refugee, can’t be charged under the IRPA with an offence over how they came to Canada.

Illegal entry is not an offence in Canada’s Criminal Code. But the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations 27 (2) says anyone who does not enter at a port of entry must check in “without delay” at a border point.

Many of Ontario’s new arrivals came via the U.S.-Quebec border, crossing at places other than a designated port of entry. If they promptly go to, or are taken to, a port of entry after they arrive, they have not breached immigration law, said Audrey Macklin, a professor and chair in human-rights law and director of the Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies at the University of Toronto. In any case, if they file a refugee claim after they arrive, and are recognized as refugees, the manner by which they entered Canada doesn’t legally matter.

 

[A Special Day]

左棍都是搅屎棍，一点都没错。
除了亿万富翁，哪个普通人有精力和金钱去法院挑战土豆党？
想想连游行都蒙着脸随时打砸抢的左棍们，大言不惭你们去告啊时，左棍们的心中是没有一丝一毫羞愧的。

那么你是承认你的解释不比专家更准确了。
作为专业人员，对于自己专业内的事，有自己的观点。对于其他专业的事，我首先尊重其他专业人士的意见。

 

[他乡枫叶]

左棍搅屎，右棍抱怨被搅浑了，挺好，配套。

 

[eclipse]

那么你是承认你的解释不比专家更准确了。

我只确认你是搅屎棍。你提出的让普通人去告土豆政府，证明了你是搅屎棍。

首先难民教授不是不学无术，他就是吃这碗饭的，没难民他就只有喝西北风了。他当然希望难民越来越多，他天天帮着申请难民就吃香的喝辣的了。

 

[chengse]

政治正确早就腐烂了。正确与政治正确越来越南辕北辙了。
这跟三个凡是是一个意思。阻止了实事求是。滋生了政治蛆虫。

 

[A Special Day]

我只确认你是搅屎棍。你提出的让普通人去告土豆政府，证明了你是搅屎棍。

首先难民教授不是不学无术，他就是吃这碗饭的，没难民他就只有喝西北风了。他当然希望难民越来越多，他天天帮着申请难民就吃香的喝辣的了。

哈哈，无下限啊。看你搬出了那个AGREEMENT，本想从你那的到一些新的不同见解。很失望啊。每个人都可以有自己的政治立场，但不能仅仅用一个左派一个右派来掩盖一些基本事实啊。

 

[eclipse]

哈哈，无下限啊。看你搬出了那个AGREEMENT，本想从你那的到一些新的不同见解。很失望啊。每个人都可以有自己的政治立场，但不能仅仅用一个左派一个右派来掩盖一些基本事实啊。

没错啊，你前面引用难民教授的观点，都是很正常正当的讨论。无论左右，都可以讨论。
但是你最后自己的一句话，暴露了本质，无下限啊。你叫我不服就去告，摆明了打算看笑话，这是想得到啥见解？