北溪一号无限期断气。加拿大帮俄罗斯修理的涡轮机还是坏的？
- 主题发起人 这都不是事儿
- 开始时间
billwanhua
本站元老
- 注册
- 2005-07-07
- 消息
- 16,262
- 荣誉分数
- 5,274
- 声望点数
- 373
Oil producer group OPEC+ surprises energy markets with a small production cut
Energy analysts had broadly expected the group to stay the course with its production policy.
Oil producer group OPEC 显然跟俄罗斯穿一条裤子，跟欧美对着干呀。这帮卖油的家伙可不像欧洲人跟钱过不去
最后编辑:
Vladimir Putin's speech:
"Caught in the inflation storm, many developing countries are asking: why bother exchanging goods with Dollars and Euros when they are losing values right before our eyes? Indeed, the economy of Imagineey wealth is inevitably being replaced by the economy of real valuables and hard assets.
According to IMF, today's global currency reserves contain 7.1 trillion dollars and 2.5 trillion euros. And this money is depreciated at an annual rate of about 8%.
Moreover, it can also be confiscated or stolen at the whim of the US if it disapproves of something in a country's policy.
I think this has become a very real threat to many countries that keep their gold and foreign exchange reserves in these currencies.
According to the objective expert analyses, in the coming years, the conversion process of reserves will get underway. Reserves will convert from weakening currencies into tangible resources like food, energy commodities and other raw materials. Clearly, this process will further fuel global dollar inflation."
Is this just Putin's view? or reality? I don't have the answer.
PS: there is another paragraph in his speech about wealthy countries' QE-- money printing. Putin accuses of wealthy countries using QE printing money to buy goods and raw materials from or " investing" in developing countries.
If it is true, why couldn't OPEC keep the raw materials ( oil and gas) prices stable above $90 ( it was said that $90 was the price OPEC+ think reasonable)
"Caught in the inflation storm, many developing countries are asking: why bother exchanging goods with Dollars and Euros when they are losing values right before our eyes? Indeed, the economy of Imagineey wealth is inevitably being replaced by the economy of real valuables and hard assets.
According to IMF, today's global currency reserves contain 7.1 trillion dollars and 2.5 trillion euros. And this money is depreciated at an annual rate of about 8%.
Moreover, it can also be confiscated or stolen at the whim of the US if it disapproves of something in a country's policy.
I think this has become a very real threat to many countries that keep their gold and foreign exchange reserves in these currencies.
According to the objective expert analyses, in the coming years, the conversion process of reserves will get underway. Reserves will convert from weakening currencies into tangible resources like food, energy commodities and other raw materials. Clearly, this process will further fuel global dollar inflation."
Is this just Putin's view? or reality? I don't have the answer.
PS: there is another paragraph in his speech about wealthy countries' QE-- money printing. Putin accuses of wealthy countries using QE printing money to buy goods and raw materials from or " investing" in developing countries.
If it is true, why couldn't OPEC keep the raw materials ( oil and gas) prices stable above $90 ( it was said that $90 was the price OPEC+ think reasonable)
最后编辑:
- 注册
- 2005-12-07
- 消息
- 21,792
- 荣誉分数
- 5,888
- 声望点数
- 373
就事论事，如果一个国家或族裔，在不和周围国家或族裔有任何来往的情况下，民主自由和选举绝对是最好的制度。
但如果放在几百个国家和上千个种族在一个地球上共同存在的情况下，就复杂了。有人的地方就有江湖，再怎么把任何理念说得高大上，在操作的时候，都夹杂私货。 在食物链上层的，或富裕的，或一个族裔延续下来的（比如盎格鲁萨克森），自然在设计这套游戏规则上，把所有的国家和族裔分成3，6，9等。民主自由这时就成了一个广告招牌。对食物链上端的绝对是好事，因为这种结构，食物链上层的可以对食物链中层低层的有实际的决定权。可以通过各种垄断的力量对其他国家和民族影响。
印度就是一个例子，论民主，印度算是最大的民主国家，在QUAD中也算是大力量之一。2020年，2021年疫情施虐的时候，看看拥有最多疫苗资源的美国，看它怎么分配疫苗就看出，你这个国家在食物链最上层的美国看来是哪一等，当时美国疫苗首先保证自己使用，完全可以理解，在给民主国家分配的时候，首先给同样盎格鲁萨克森的5眼国家
然后以色列，西欧国家
然后，北欧，中欧，南欧
亚洲最大的朋友日本都在后面。
印度当时想拿美国和加拿大不想要的阿斯利康都费尽周折，最后拿到一些快过期的疫苗
中国在他们的实际等级下，即使全盘拥抱美式民主，算几等呢？
看看伊拉克被改造成民主国家后怎么样了？ 上2周什叶派暴动都攻进巴格达绿区了。武装占领了议会大楼，打得不可开交。西方媒体都没有报道，WHO CARES， 打去吧，打得越凶，中东国家越依赖美国。
说这面这些，并非证明现在老G和老X这样做就对了，现在就是比谁更烂的年代。看看现在世界主要强国各自都有不少不堪入目的事情。
中国还是回到僧破当时的政策吧，那样相对平衡一些。
