分红式人寿保险,有人有经验吗?

我和老婆买的终身保险,相互为受益人。不管谁先挂,后挂的人继承一笔死亡赔偿金,到时候请得起保姆,再混到死。
你如何能拿到这55万呢?


我死了之后,我老婆拿。
 
所谓分红式,就是死亡赔偿金一直涨,直到所保的目标人物死。所以目标人物活得越长,受益人拿的钱越多。

这到底有什么不好?
 
我15年每年投1万,一共投了15万,现在赔偿金是55万,涨了3倍多。

我不信你的RRSP股票账户的收益有这么多。巴菲特也做不到。

Again,适合你就是挺好的。

但是,你这个说法是不对的,你这是保险和投资收益混为一谈,你不能说这55万是投资收益。
那买个term的人寿险每年1000刀,死了赔50万,这50万不能去和巴菲特比投资收益吧。
 
Again,适合你就是挺好的。

但是,你这个说法是不对的,你这是保险和投资收益混为一谈,你不能说这55万是投资收益。
那买个term的人寿险每年1000刀,死了赔50万,这50万不能去和巴菲特比投资收益吧。


不是混为一谈,而是相互利用。

我知道,有些人煞有介事地说,投资是投资,保险是保险,不能混。咋一听,很有理,但是仔细一想,又不知道理在哪。
 
最后编辑:
越算越可怕,这不是在赌谁先死吗?


不用赌,我肯定先死。我迟早被CFC上的垃圾们骂死。

但是我死了,我能够忍心让跟我几十年的老婆生活拮据吗?所以,为她买份保险,是最起码的事情。
 
*It is all BS-- -TLDR

我15年每年投1万,一共投了15万,现在赔偿金是55万,涨了3倍多。

我不信你的RRSP股票账户的收益有这么多。巴菲特也做不到。

Someone paid $10,000 per year for a death benefit of $200,000 + $200,000 for the Whole Life insurance. Respectfully assuming he accidentally died in the first year, his wife would get paid $400,000 for his death. We can't say "收益涨了"40 倍多, 巴菲特 + Munger "也做不到"。 That comparison is Apple Vs Orange. "投资是投资,保险是保险", differnt things.

Life insurance is a product. People pay a premium to buy and consume it, Although Universal or Whole Life has a small investment component in it, like EDO in the Whole Life Insurance (Screenshot below), it is still a life insurance at large. The death benefits are $200,000 + $200,000 (? confused)=$400,000 which won't change with the age growing. Hence, one should expect the "增长率" (inappropriate wording) to become lower or slower because the large amount ( $400,000) is fixed, and only two figures change. If $400,000 was taken out of the calculation and only calculated the other two, " 增长率" is good.

1712281639829.png


Assuming he did not buy the Whole Life insurance but invested all the premium he paid for the past 15 years at a reasonable average annual 5% return investment, he would get a total return of $236,104 ( calculation below). That was much less than the death benefit of $558,357. But don't forget that, to get this $558,357 from insurance, his loved ones have to attend his funnel.


1712272542674.png




Let's assume again one has another 45 years of good life to live with his wife. I don't know how his insurance broker tailored his premium payment terms. In general, Whole Life insurance requires continuously paying the premium until the insured person perishes. So he has to pay his life insurance premium for another 45 years. Let's say, he invests all the premiums for another 45 years. It can accrue at an investment of 5% return to a hefty $4,093,053 total in another 45 years (see calculation below).

What are his death benefits when he lives another 45 years? and how much premium has he paid for the life insurance In total? I'm sure his broker should have calculated it for him.


1712264071092.png


Note;
1)From the information in this post, the insurance premium is $7,310 per year and the investment portion is $2, 690 per year, Not sure how the premium payments were scheduled. The above is just an approximate calculation with some guesses. So it is not accurate and should not be taken seriously.

2) The investment components can be taken out either for the insurance premium payment or for dividend payment when it reaches a certain time.

3) Like everyone else, we all encountered life insurance questions when we came to this country. I did a bit of research and these are my simple understanding of life insurance.

4) I look forward to deeper comprehension and brighter insights on life insurance in this post.
 

附件

  • 1712272527886.png
    1712272527886.png
    24.3 KB · 查看: 11
最后编辑:
首先惊讶于你特立独行的大咖做了貌似最保守的选择,其次3%的收益率是实际发生的,但是你当年买的的时候,计划模型肯定不止3%吧?应该6-7,20年后取钱,或者是假定一个年龄开始取钱,比如65岁都可以,或者随时借钱出来也可以,反正模型看起来像个房子:可以增值,可以取钱,人死相当于卖了房子
 
首先惊讶于你特立独行的大咖做了貌似最保守的选择,其次3%的收益率是实际发生的,但是你当年买的的时候,计划模型肯定不止3%吧?应该6-7,20年后取钱,或者是假定一个年龄开始取钱,比如65岁都可以,或者随时借钱出来也可以,反正模型看起来像个房子:可以增值,可以取钱,人死相当于卖了房子


你在说我吧?
你提醒了我去对比当初的估值,的确差一点,但是差不多。

3%的年回报率,外加一份40万的保险。我很满意。

如果把用于买保险的那部分钱排除出成本,那么,年回报率超过10%
 
后退
顶部