ZT$30让CNN破产。抗议CNN恶意诽谤华人 最佳应对方法!!!

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 wuwei
  • 开始时间 开始时间

wuwei

初级会员
VIP
注册
2002-01-30
消息
11,781
荣誉分数
578
声望点数
273
$30让CNN破产。抗议CNN恶意诽谤华人 最佳应对方法!!!
$30让CNN破产。抗议CNN恶意诽谤华人 最佳应对方法!!!



A Summary on Best way to 抗议CNN恶意诽谤华人(求置顶)
来源: mengnong 于 08-04-23 08:43:53

Every Chinese in America goes to the local small claim court and to file a small claim ($500) against CNN and Cafferty. It will cost you $50 or so to do it, you are probably not going to win (since you have no way to prove that you have the $500 financial damage). But it will cost CNN $1000 or more to defend each case, they can not counter-sue you either, because you did not cause damage to them. If we have 5000 to do so, they will act right away. You can do it anywhere in USA, the more remote location the better.

. This is what I did.
I filed a small claim in a county small claim court in Kansas. The defandant is TIME WARNER INC.
Address ONE TIME WARNER CENTER
NEW YORK, NY 10019
Telephone 2124848000

My claim: Time Warner employee, Jack Cafferty in a publically broadcasted TV news program (CNN) asserted Chinese are a bunch of "goons". This statement severely damaged my credit, which resulted $500 financial loss to my business.

Analysis: 1. why $500?
A: In Kansas, $500 or less, the filing fee is $30, otherwise it will be $50.
2. What is the next step?
In Kansas, you just need to use registered mail to mail it to the defendant, other states may require you to use law enforcement to serve a summon, which will cost you $25 to $50.
3. What will happen?
a) If the defendant does not show up, the judge will make a default judgment, that means, Time Warner will pay me $500, plus the $30 court fee.
b) If the defendant send an attorney to the court at the court date, (which is 3 weeks later, the defendant can request a postpone), then the judge will probably make a judgment to the defendant (I lose) since I can not provide evidence that I had the $500 damage. Then I lose the $30 court fee, that is it.
c) The defendant attorney could call me before the court date, try to settle it outside the court, or try to persuade me to withdraw by threatening counter-suing me, (which I know they can't, I did not do anything to cause them damage, suing them does not count).
I am waiting for their call, I am willing to settle outside the court, my request is “CNN fires Jack Cafferty.” Otherwise, I will see you in court.

No matter what, it will cost them a lot of money for the attorney fee.

Why not a class-action lawsuit?
Can anyone provide evidences that you really suffered material damage? Otherwise, you do not have a case.
Besides, all big companies in US have one kind or another lawsuit ongoing, they are not afraid of one or two lawsuits. But, will they defend 1000 or 5000 suits to protect a worth-less employee?
This is why we need to have as many people as possible to file the suit in as many places as possible.

Can we sue Cafferty only?
No, it is very hard for a local court to enforce a judgment against an out-of-state person, many courts will not accept these type of suit. Even the case is accepted, the judge can still dismiss the case, (you will lose your court fee). Even a judgment is made in your favor, you will not be able to collect anything from him.

Can I sue if I am not a US citizen?
Anybody can file the suit. Please do it, this is American experience.

Is there any negative consequence on me if I sue?
If you lose, I will lose the court fee. If you are going to apply a mortgage DURING the suit, you need to disclose it , it may not affect your mortgage application at all. Other than that, no negative effects on you. It will NOT have anything to do with your green card application.

Will it damage the Chinese image by filing so many lawsuits?
I don't know how will other people think. It is a common practice for Americans. If you do not fight the American way, you lose already, what good is your image for?

Sorry, written in a hurry, there might be mis-information.
Thanks to all the friends who responded favorably. Please feel free to post to other sites.
 
少量人作这事:无效。大量人作这事:真的可能导致主流社会对华人的歧视了。

抛开对错不谈,这件事最多也就是一场国家形象(华人形象)的公关战。为一件不合己意的报道评论而恶意企图使人破产,这样的公众形象,恐怕不是我们想要的。
 
少量人作这事:无效。大量人作这事:真的可能导致主流社会对华人的歧视了。

抛开对错不谈,这件事最多也就是一场国家形象(华人形象)的公关战。为一件不合己意的报道评论而恶意企图使人破产,这样的公众形象,恐怕不是我们想要的。


这办法好不好是一回事,你把CNN恶意诽谤谩骂轻描淡写成"一件不合己意的报道评论"你的立场显而易见.
 
这办法好不好是一回事,你把CNN恶意诽谤谩骂轻描淡写成"一件不合己意的报道评论"你的立场显而易见.

老兄忘了我们要公关的对象是谁。我的立场无关紧要,西方老百姓看问题的角度才是重要的。

那位嘴臭的评论员今天才嘴臭的吗?
 
老兄忘了我们要公关的对象是谁。我的立场无关紧要,西方老百姓看问题的角度才是重要的。

那位嘴臭的评论员今天才嘴臭的吗?

是你把CNN恶意诽谤谩骂轻描淡写成"一件不合己意的报道评论"的立场,才会把将通过法律途径解决问题说成"恶意企图使人破产".
西方老百姓看问题的角度是他们的事,你只关心"西方老百姓"感受而无视中国老百姓的感受就是歧视,也是违反人权的.我们无需迎合去对"西方老百姓"做你说的"公关",他们喜欢这种喜欢满嘴吐粪的丑嘴是他们的事,我们据理抗争是我们的权利,也是争取互相理解的一种方式.
 
是你把CNN恶意诽谤谩骂轻描淡写成"一件不合己意的报道评论"的立场,才会把将通过法律途径解决问题说成"恶意企图使人破产".
西方老百姓看问题的角度是他们的事,你只关心"西方老百姓"感受而无视中国老百姓的感受就是歧视,也是违反人权的.我们无需迎合去对"西方老百姓"做你说的"公关",他们喜欢这种喜欢满嘴吐粪的丑嘴是他们的事,我们据理抗争是我们的权利,也是争取互相理解的一种方式.


$30让CNN破产。抗议CNN恶意诽谤华人 最佳应对方法!!!

不好意思,你的"该提议只是'通过法律途径解决问题'"而不是"恶意企图使人破产"一说看上去象是故意的谎言 - 当然,这其实只是常见的一种辩论的“兵法”^^。

另外,西方老百姓看问题的角度,当然是他们的事。但是如果碰巧我们希望改善我们在他们心目中的形象,并且希望“争取互相理解”,这就变成是一件我们应该要了解的事了。
 
好在那只是一小撮华人。
 
不好意思,你的"该提议只是'通过法律途径解决问题'"而不是"恶意企图使人破产"一说看上去象是故意的谎言 - 当然,这其实只是常见的一种辩论的“兵法”^^。

另外,西方老百姓看问题的角度,当然是他们的事。但是如果碰巧我们希望改善我们在他们心目中的形象,并且希望“争取互相理解”,这就变成是一件我们应该要了解的事了。


首先看清楚这是ZT,不是我的.
"该提议"行不行大家可以讨论,我也想知道可行性.
" $30让CNN破产"的说法是作者认为这办法能使CNN不能不认真对待他们的错误.CNN也不会简单因此破产.但是人民如果对CNN无赖行为能有合法的抗争手段总是好的.
西方老百姓一天老看CNN这种胡说八道的东西对他们也是没有什么好处,如果我们的抗争能使CNN能变的公正点就是"改善我们在他们心目中的形象"的最好办法.
 
$30让CNN破产。

413渥村爱党秀的多伦多方面的资金窟窿,已经说明,别说30刀,就是3刀,‘爱党’人士也不会出。

也就是过过嘴瘾,在家里玩玩打仗
 
413渥村爱党秀的多伦多方面的资金窟窿,已经说明,别说30刀,就是3刀,‘爱党’人士也不会出。

也就是过过嘴瘾,在家里玩玩打仗



那你也别替CNN担心了,该干嘛干嘛去,除非这是你的工作.
 
那你也别替CNN担心了,该干嘛干嘛去,除非这是你的工作.

只许你在家里玩打仗,咱在腰里别把木头枪就不行?俺也不相信爱国是您的工作,即使使馆有这方面的funding。
 
只许你在家里玩打仗,咱在腰里别把木头枪就不行?


还是赶快去注册另一马甲吧,快断气了还别什么木头枪:p
 
后退
顶部