美国对中国的战争已经开始。

terry890

知名会员
注册
2004-08-20
消息
1,069
荣誉分数
119
声望点数
173
Called Air Sea battle
In a detailed analysis paper in this summer’s issue of the Yale Journal of International Affairs, the famed sociologist and military-policy expert Amitai Etzioni asks, “Who authorized preparations for war with China?” His answer is stark: Mr. Obama has spoken of a “pivot to Asia,” but there has been no political intent or desire to have such an active military confrontation with China – in fact, the politics and diplomacy have been moving in the opposite direction.
“The United States is preparing for a war with China, a momentous decision that so far has failed to receive a thorough review from elected officials, namely the White House and Congress,” Prof. Etzioni writes. “In the public sphere there was no debate – led by either think tanks or public intellectuals – like that which is ongoing over whether or not to use the military option against Iran’s nuclear program, or the debate surrounding the 2009 surge of troops in Afghanistan.”
But the AirSea Battle plan has far more expensive and dangerous implications. “The imagined result of ASB is the ability to end a conflict with China in much the same way the United States ended WWII: The U.S. military defeats China and dictates the surrender terms.” This is a drastic change from Cold War approaches, where nuclear-scale conflict was carefully avoided.
The plan scares the heck out of many military figures. “AirSea Battle is demonizing China,” James Cartwright, the former vice-chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned last year. “That’s not in anybody’s interest.” A Marine Corps assessment warned that the concept is “preposterously expensive to build in peace time” and, if used as intended, would “cause incalculable human and economic destruction,” in good part because it makes escalation to nuclear war far more likely.
And the Chinese have responded in kind: “If the U.S. military develops AirSea Battle to deal with the [People’s Liberation Army],” Col. Gauyue Fan warned, “the PLA will be forced to develop anti-AirSea Battle.”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/comm...-for-cameras-prepare-for-war/article13196146/

http://yalejournal.org/2013/06/12/who-authorized-preparations-for-war-with-china/
 
in fact, the politics and diplomacy have been moving in the opposite direction

據說中國第一大部為外交部,第二大部為國防部。
希望外交部再大點,國防部再小點。
美國第一大部為國防部,外交部擠到第十大左右了。
 
是不是老美认为和平演变没戏了?

带路党们尽管摇旗呐喊,配合老美,但是还是不够给力啊!
 
是不是老美认为和平演变没戏了?

带路党们尽管摇旗呐喊,配合老美,但是还是不够给力啊!

你说的美国是指谁呢?
美国政府?
美国民众?
某些社会团体?
如果美国民众知道他们养的政府那么关心其他国家,还会投票给他吗?
有多少美国人吃饱了撑的去想什么和平演变其他国家呢?
你会老想着你邻居家的事吗?
某些社会团体会这样做,但他们人数会少到忽略不计。

还剩下什么呢?
只有老毛才会不停的忽悠,说什么美帝苏修亡我之心不死。
连老邓都认为没那回事。
 
你说的美国是指谁呢?
美国政府?
美国民众?
某些社会团体?
如果美国民众知道他们养的政府那么关心其他国家,还会投票给他吗?
有多少美国人吃饱了撑的去想什么和平演变其他国家呢?
你会老想着你邻居家的事吗?
某些社会团体会这样做,但他们人数会少到忽略不计。

还剩下什么呢?
只有老毛才会不停的忽悠,说什么美帝苏修亡我之心不死。
连老邓都认为没那回事。


美国政府
 
后退
顶部