加拿大的国家情报安全局还是很关心中国的

[苦逼热狗]

今天新出了个文章分析中国

http://www.csis-scrs.gc.ca/pblctns/cdmctrch/20130930-eng.asp

The Security Dimensions of an Influential China

Table of Contents

• The conference and its objectives
• Chapter 1 – Political Trends Arising from the 18th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party
• Chapter 2 – Party Consensus and Communist Ideology after Bo Xilai
• Chapter 3 – Choices, Dilemmas, and Risks for Chinese Leadership after the 18th Congress
• Chapter 4 – Rising Tensions? Youth and Popular Culture, Consumerism and the Future of China’s Social Contract
• Chapter 5 – Dreams and Ghosts: Assessing the “Social Mood” in Today’s China
• Chapter 6 – Why China Cannot Rise Peacefully
• Chapter 7 – Future Security Challenges in China-US Relations and Their Long-Term Global Consequences
• Chapter 8 – Update on Sino-European Relations
• Chapter 9 – The People’s Liberation Army, the Party and the State : Civil-Military Relations Under the New Leadership
• Chapter 10 – Assessing the Risk of Conflict in the South China Sea
• Chapter 11 – Economic and Geo-Political Implications of China-centric Globalisation
• Chapter 12 – Chinese Acquisition of Canadian Companies and Chinese Greenfield Investments in Canada: When are there Genuine National Security Threats?
• Chapter 13 – Industrial Upgrading in China: Moving in the Right Direction?
• Chapter 14 – The Implications of China’s Resource Quest
• Chapter 15 – China’s Acquisition of Natural Resources Abroad: Australia’s Experience
• Chapter 16 – China and the Arctic
• Chapter 17 – The Security Implications of China’s Use of Cyberspace and Related Trends
• Chapter 18 – Confucius Institutes: Distinguishing the Political from the Cultural
• Chapter 19 – Age-old Temptations and the Protection of Trade Secrets

 

[heureux]

瞧瞧

 

[小龙年]

呵，有点意思

 

[ccc]

我还纳闷呢，CSIS真有人才啊。
原来如此。

World Watch: Expert Notes series publication No. 2013-09-02
This report is based on the views expressed during, and short papers contributed by
speakers at, a conference organised by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service as part
of its academic outreach program. Offered as a means to support ongoing discussion,
the report does not constitute an analytical document, nor does it represent any formal
position of the organisations involved. The conference was conducted under the Chatham
House Rule; therefore no attributions area made and the identity of speakers and
participants is not disclosed.
www.csis-scrs.gc.ca
Published September 2013
Printed in Canada
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada

 

[ccc]

好么，１４６页。

 

[ccc]

Chatham House Rule
The Chatham House Rule is a core principle that governs the confidentiality of the source of information received at a meeting. The rule originated in June 1927 at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, also known as Chatham House.[1] Since its refinement in 2002, the rule states:[2]
When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.
The rule allows people to speak as individuals and to express views that may not be those of their organisations, and therefore, encourages free discussion. Speakers are free to voice their own opinions, without concern for their personal reputation or their official duties and affiliations. The Chatham House Rule resolves a boundary problem faced by many communities of practice, in that it permits acknowledgement of the community or conversation, while protecting the freedom of interaction that is necessary for the community to carry out its conversations.
The aim of the rule is to guarantee anonymity to those speaking within its walls so that better international relations may be achieved. The rule is now used internationally as an aid to free discussion.[3] The original rule was refined in October 1992 and again, in 2002.[4] Chatham House has translated the rule into Arabic, Chinese, French, German, Portuguese, Spanish and Russian.[5]
Meetings, or parts of meetings, either may be held on the record, or, under the Chatham House Rule. In the latter case, all participants are understood to have agreed that it would be conducive to free discussion that they should be subject to the rule for the relevant part of the meeting. The success of the rule may depend upon it being considered morally binding, particularly in circumstances where a failure to comply with the rule may not result in sanction.
Care needs to be taken not to invoke the Chatham House Rule where what is intended is that the views discussed be kept confidential. The Chatham House Rule is intended to promote public discussion of the views expressed at a meeting, but without attributing those views to any individual or organisation.

 

[冷笑9声]

好么，１４６页。

英文好的，给个故事梗概行么？

 

[ccc]

英文好的，给个故事梗概行么？

热狗给的那目录就够了。

 

[johnsun69]

没什么新鲜的，仍然是崛起的中国会威胁美国，抄剩饭而已。

 

[小地主]

英文好的，给个故事梗概行么？

转鱼４＠鱼４

话说当年TERRY贴的这个９０分钟的VIDEO我可是从头看到尾。。。

 

[冷笑9声]

转鱼４＠鱼４

话说当年TERRY贴的这个９０分钟的VIDEO我可是从头看到尾。。。

宝马好，90分钟您内？比狗子也没梗概到哪去啊？ 俺晚上有空一定看看。

 

[小地主]

宝马好，90分钟您内？比狗子也没梗概到哪去啊？ 俺晚上有空一定看看。

知道一本打发时间的厕所读物＜经济学人＞一期北京机场卖多少钱？７５RMB。。

村长说了，１４６页，FREE。。知足吧您内。。