在加拿大用玩具手枪威胁人违法吗？

[这都不是事儿]

如题

 

[Mikejia]

这都不是事。可以试试威胁警察~~~ 然后嘣一声。拜拜

 

[一亩三分地]

Under the Canadian Firearms Program, Airsoft guns resembling with near precision an existing make and model of an arm, other than an antique arm, are considered replica arms and therefore are prohibited devices. Coloured,black,Full Metal, miniaturized versions, or models resembling antique arms may be allowed with muzzle velocity between 366-500Fps; therefore being designated as an uncontrolled arm as of 2011 before this you could only purchase black and clear Airsoft Guns. Generally, antique arms are those manufactured before 1898.[8] Air guns with a maximum muzzle velocity of 152.4 m/s (500 f/s) and/or a maximum muzzle energy of 5.7 joules or 4.2 foot-pounds are exempt from licensing, registration, and other requirements; and from penalties for possessing an arm without a valid license or registration certificate. The Criminal Code of Canada requires that reasonable precautions be taken to use, carry, handle, store, transport and ship these devices in a safe and secure manner. Airsoft guns that exceed either of the maximum velocity or muzzle energy are considered arms.[9]

An Airsoft gun is treated just as if it was a real arm when used to commit or attempt a crime.

In Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec, the minimum age to purchase Airsoft is 18. Children under age will be able to use arms. Children under 18 must be supervised by someone over 18.

Nowadays, many overseas/international retailers in the US as well as in Asia sell Canadian-ready guns, or offer services to make them meet Canada's requirements. Oftentimes, if the CBSA is unsure, a letter will be sent out, and an appeal can be made to test the gun. These airsoft guns are typically sent to the importer's local police agency (used to be the RCMP) for the firearms to be tested. This process typically takes 2 weeks to even a whole year; most tend to be in the 2 months range.

 

[Ayin_Ottawa]

不管真枪假枪，威胁别人（包括你认为的玩笑话）都可能带来不可预测的后果。

严肃点，不要拿自己的命开玩笑。

 

[gumpgump]

即使通过删除状语‘用玩具手枪’来把问题简化成‘威胁人违法吗?’，这问题也是有明确答案的。所以就无所谓‘用玩具手枪’or whatever了，即使用嘴，这问题的答案依然明确而固定。

在Ottawa发生过用玩具手枪追逐游戏者，被闻讯赶来的特警扑倒并控制的先例。因为有趣，旁观者乐于看到更多。

 

[向问天]

即使通过删除状语‘用玩具手枪’来把问题简化成‘威胁人违法吗?’，这问题也是有明确答案的。所以就无所谓‘用玩具手枪’or whatever了，即使用嘴，这问题的答案依然明确而固定。

在Ottawa发生过用玩具手枪追逐游戏者，被闻讯赶来的特警扑倒并控制的先例。大家乐于看到更多。

我觉得要看威胁的目的是什么。比如为了防卫， 为了制止犯罪呢？

 

[gumpgump]

我觉得要看威胁的目的是什么。比如为了防卫， 为了制止犯罪呢？

在此之前，我还以为威胁是指threaten，现在学习到了原来威胁是指受害人defense。不知道在法院，是不是也用defense表达threaten，或者可以把threaten辩护成defense。

揣着明白装糊涂，玩文字游戏，其实大有文章可做的。

即使在中文里，原来以为，似乎也还有‘威吓、喝止、喝阻、遏止’来避免把'威胁'用来和'正当防卫'混淆视听的词汇。今天也算看到了，只要需要，其实可以随意令中文变得很贫乏，并让‘正当防卫’= ‘威胁’。

 

[Mikejia]

http://rt.com/usa/boy-13-shot-toy-gun-644/

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2013/11/19/another-kid-toy-gun-shot-cops/

 

[uglyducking]

如题

不是说好了各玩各的吗？楼主这是要拿玩具枪威胁谁去啊？

 

[zeus190]

我记得美国有个持枪协会指引说如果想用枪防身，出枪就要准备杀人，否则自己更危险。所以用玩具枪威胁他人简直就是作死

 

[annyInRain]

。。