rogers 无线网加强信号的问题

................you have no clue.
wifi signal are boardcasted by your wifi router not your isp........

your signal strength only implies your isp gave you a shitty wireless router which you shouldn't even rent them at the first place.........

He might think Bell's integrated modem/router has stranger wifi signals than Rogers ones.
 
He might think Bell's integrated modem/router has stranger wifi signals than Rogers ones.
这就跟你去sony store买记忆卡一样,人家压根就不造这个,价格坑爹不说,效果还不一定最好
 
Why am I paying extra for wifi router if ISP already has one?



Rogers gives me a wifi-enabled router, that suppose to work for the house, but not. I have SMC before, then Cisco, then Hitronic. All three give me shitty wifi strength in the second floor.



I can buy another router for 40-50$, but what's the point?



Points are

1) I paid no model rental fee for modem to Rogers and Bell;

2) I paid more to Rogers than Bell but shitty wifi modem;

3) I don't want to pay extra for something (a router) that should work in the first place;





................you have no clue.

wifi signal are boardcasted by your wifi router not your isp........



your signal strength only implies your isp gave you a shitty wireless router which you shouldn't even rent them at the first place.........
 
keep trolling on something you have no clue about does not make you smart.

OP is here for a solution to his existing network not to replace his network.
 
keep trolling on something you have no clue about does not make you smart.

OP is here for a solution to his existing network not to replace his network.

he doesn't know there's a thing called bargaining with ISP for free stuff....

ie. free modem, free #Gs cap, 30-50% off price....
 
In terms of reparing cars, you may be an expert. But for the modem/router/ISP stuff, the others guys are way ahead of you.

I agree with them that your WIFI signal issue has nothing to do with ISP. It's the wireless router that matters. Most tech-savvy people don't use the modem-router-combo from ISP, simply because it's not good enough in many ways. At the monent, you are happy because you have not reached the level of serious router usage that the other guys do.


maybe. LOL :)
 
我也有类似情况。ROGERS 的HITRON换了三个,最后放弃。刚买了个SMC也不一定好,但没的选了。今天试着BRIDGED SMC,再接老的DLINK ROUTER。就是没INTERNET。很多人都这么做了,但我怎么也没搞明白。生气没用,还得想办法。
 
Why am I paying extra for wifi router if ISP already has one?



Rogers gives me a wifi-enabled router, that suppose to work for the house, but not. I have SMC before, then Cisco, then Hitronic. All three give me shitty wifi strength in the second floor.



I can buy another router for 40-50$, but what's the point?



Points are

1) I paid no model rental fee for modem to Rogers and Bell;

2) I paid more to Rogers than Bell but shitty wifi modem;

3) I don't want to pay extra for something (a router) that should work in the first place;

说得没错。但天下乌鸦一般黑,BELL也不一定好。我也听到很多人咒骂BELL。只能碰运气。
 
说得没错。但天下乌鸦一般黑,BELL也不一定好。我也听到很多人咒骂BELL。只能碰运气。
bell的2701 modem是市面上最稳定的了,比thomson之流强多了,唯一的问题是不能bridge mode (firmware disable了)

但是如果上了bell的VDSL, 用阿朗的那个破cellpipe, 那就哭吧。
 
后退
顶部