投票:您对ABC电视台娱乐节目孩子讲出“杀光中国人”事件的看法

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 Riven
  • 开始时间 开始时间

您对ABC电视台娱乐节目孩子讲出“杀光中国人”事件的看法


  • 全部投票
    110
  • 投票关闭 .
讨JI檄文

如今,人方为刀俎,我为鱼肉,此诚危急存亡之秋也。海外华人的情势岌岌可危。而部
分同胞以为危险已过,对处境丧失了起码的认识和警惕性。

近现代以来,我同胞最不平、最伤心惨目之事,莫过于排华法案。旧金山之奴工、猪仔
,饥寒交迫,葬身无地,距今不足百年。而近二十年来,美帝宣传机器开动,众口铄金
,积毁销骨,反华日嚣。华人之可鄙、可恶、可欺形象竟深入人心。

而今屠华之论骤出,造衅已开,叫嚣屠杀之声赫然列于主流媒体,徘徊于头版之间,其
势汹汹,言犹在耳,情何已堪?何人能堪?ABC实为国家媒体,如此包藏祸心,即便事
后撤销视频,此“过”能否补偿于万一?不消说其余抑扬高下,播弄中华各族之处,更
非笔墨所能形容。人神之所共愤,天地之所不容!

一人之心,千万人之心也。主持人之心,实在说出了千万美帝群氓之心。此有贼心,有
群胆。倘时机成熟,以我族之寡,重蹈印尼覆辙,流亡千里,血光之祸只在一夜之间耳!

而我同胞之中,又有一种根器特异,别树一帜,以号于众者,曰“老华侨”,曰“老议
员”。老华侨者流,据坛讲经,一团和气,四面玲珑,成日高谈其奋斗历史,而不敢出
唐人街范围。老议员者流,寻章摘句,钻营奔竞,无所不至,终年守其票仓、捐献之款
项以成名。于是唐人街之上,柔静愚鲁之辈,莘莘济济,鱼鱼雅雅;而抗议发愤之徒绝
迹,慷慨悲歌之声不闻,名为唐人,实则死人之不若。

当此转机之时,我同胞之素志,虽不及龙骧虎视包括四海;但奋发出声,追其元凶,震
荡宇内,应是题中之意。一抔之土未干,六尺之孤何托?则进,可发同仇敌忾之声,恢
弘志士之气,激后人之志。退,可广结声势,跨连州府,同气连枝。若徘徊岐路,坐昧
先几之兆,我族败亡之日,当在不远。

愿我百万千万之同胞,团结奋力。且看来日域中,竟是谁的天下!

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/SanFrancisco/34055363.html
 
讨JI檄文

如今,人方为刀俎,我为鱼肉,此诚危急存亡之秋也。海外华人的情势岌岌可危。而部
分同胞以为危险已过,对处境丧失了起码的认识和警惕性。

近现代以来,我同胞最不平、最伤心惨目之事,莫过于排华法案。旧金山之奴工、猪仔
,饥寒交迫,葬身无地,距今不足百年。而近二十年来,美帝宣传机器开动,众口铄金
,积毁销骨,反华日嚣。华人之可鄙、可恶、可欺形象竟深入人心。

而今屠华之论骤出,造衅已开,叫嚣屠杀之声赫然列于主流媒体,徘徊于头版之间,其
势汹汹,言犹在耳,情何已堪?何人能堪?ABC实为国家媒体,如此包藏祸心,即便事
后撤销视频,此“过”能否补偿于万一?不消说其余抑扬高下,播弄中华各族之处,更
非笔墨所能形容。人神之所共愤,天地之所不容!

一人之心,千万人之心也。主持人之心,实在说出了千万美帝群氓之心。此有贼心,有
群胆。倘时机成熟,以我族之寡,重蹈印尼覆辙,流亡千里,血光之祸只在一夜之间耳!

而我同胞之中,又有一种根器特异,别树一帜,以号于众者,曰“老华侨”,曰“老议
员”。老华侨者流,据坛讲经,一团和气,四面玲珑,成日高谈其奋斗历史,而不敢出
唐人街范围。老议员者流,寻章摘句,钻营奔竞,无所不至,终年守其票仓、捐献之款
项以成名。于是唐人街之上,柔静愚鲁之辈,莘莘济济,鱼鱼雅雅;而抗议发愤之徒绝
迹,慷慨悲歌之声不闻,名为唐人,实则死人之不若。

当此转机之时,我同胞之素志,虽不及龙骧虎视包括四海;但奋发出声,追其元凶,震
荡宇内,应是题中之意。一抔之土未干,六尺之孤何托?则进,可发同仇敌忾之声,恢
弘志士之气,激后人之志。退,可广结声势,跨连州府,同气连枝。若徘徊岐路,坐昧
先几之兆,我族败亡之日,当在不远。

愿我百万千万之同胞,团结奋力。且看来日域中,竟是谁的天下!

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/SanFrancisco/34055363.html

@老华侨
 
最新的一部分多了一些我们的人。

本来我觉得没什么大不了,但看了有些辩护的话挺生气的。
 
<ZT>
by moonflower7 (teddybearmom)
As parents and teachers, we do our best to nurture our children. We teach them good values, guide them in the right directions when they make mistakes; we protect them from all harms before they are mature enough to protect themselves. To shield young children from inappropriate contents on TV, many parents have used the parental control features on their remote control. Initially, I thought ABC is a family friendly TV channel whose contents do not need to be monitored, but the Jimmy Kimmel's "Kid's round table" show on Oct 16 proved me wrong.

In response to the question on how to pay back our debts to other nations, a 6 year old boy proposed the idea of "Killing everyone in China". Mr. Kimmel chuckled at the answer and made the comment that this was an "interesting idea". After leading the young guests to a debate on the feasibility of using mass murder as a problem solving strategy, Mr. Kimmel further asked the kids in the show "Should we allow the Chinese to live?”, to which he got mixed answers.

I had briefly wondered how this little boy came up with the idea of “killing everyone” in a nation. Then I realized that the “Jimmy Kimmel Live” is not even a live show. Like all talk shows, there are hundreds of people working behind-the-scenes. Each writer is responsible for writing monologue jokes and each usually has an assignment for a specific guest. The shows are recorded earlier in the day to allow enough time for necessary editing.

Now I know that the 6 year old may not understand what he was saying, but the adults behind the show must know what they were doing. Instead of asking “Should we allow someone to live?”, which should not even be a question to begin with, maybe we can ask the following questions instead: Should we allow adults to channel messages of mass murder and genocide through a 6 year old? Should we allow our children to consider, even for a second, killing people as a way to solve or escape from their problems? Should we allow a TV host to expose thousands of innocent young viewers to messages of violence and hatred? Should we allow a TV program to use race baiting to boost a show’s popularity? Should we allow our children to suffer from all the negative publicity, to be laughed at, to be emotionally traumatized, so that some adults can enjoy cheap and distasteful jokes?

Enough is enough! It is time to protect our children from malicious programs on TV. It is time to say no to the adults who attempted to mislead and use innocent kids for their own agenda. Every day we shower our children with love. How can we tolerate the people who purposefully delivered hate speech that have potentially counteracted all our efforts? Until ABC issues a formal protocol to make sure something in that vein never gets aired again, until the company lets go of all the people who lacks basic judgment and human decency, we are not viewing your program again. We are not creating revenues for Disney and ABC, until you prove with your actions, that you really endorse the values your adorable cartoon characters represent.
 
本来我觉得没什么大不了,但看了有些辩护的话挺生气的。
为啥生气,人是不同的,不能苛求
 
刚又看了一遍视频. 小孩子们都挺聪明的. 国债我们是一定要还的, 但是如果债主不能来拿钱(比如被墙挡着来不了), 或者先DEFAULT了(比如被杀), 那就是没问题了.
绝对都是狠角色, 完全理解资本市场的精髓. 以后都能干出比MADOFF还厉害的大事, 一定要好好培养起来. :D:D:D:D:D:D
怎么想起来犹太人在瑞士存的钱了, 据说因为找不到主人, 就被瑞士银行一直用着.
 
本来要找娱乐节目,应该道歉的。。。木有,就凑合选A吧。 倒不是节目有啥错,就是谁让美国人道德标准高呢。
 
后退
顶部