Rogers的尾巴终于被抓住了

飘在加国

资深人士
注册
2006-01-16
消息
1,955
荣誉分数
458
声望点数
243
Rogers Accused Of Charging For Traffic That Never Uses Their Networks

Rogers Communications is denying online accusations that it charges its internet customers for internal traffic on their routers, even if that traffic doesn’t use the Rogers network.

Several users of the social news site Reddit claim Rogers charged them for traffic on their local area network — traffic moving between computers on a Rogers-issued home router but which doesn’t go through Rogers’ internet infrastructure.

One Reddit user told The Huffington Post Canada he noticed his internet usage count jump by 50 gigabytes last month during a period when he was hardly surfing the web — but had transferred 50 gigabytes’ worth of data from one computer to another using a router.

The customer, who declined to be named in this article to protect his online anonymity, said a Rogers customer service rep told him the company charges for all traffic on a subscriber’s home network, regardless of whether it goes through Rogers’ network.

“In my opinion this is outright theft,” he said.

He said Rogers offered him a lower monthly price and a higher download limit when he complained, but he still plans to switch internet service providers.

Rogers vehemently denies this is happening.

“The only traffic that is counted towards the monthly usage allowance is the traffic that leaves the customer’s modem and goes across the Rogers network,” a Rogers spokesperson told The Huffington Post Canada in an email.

“If a customer is moving a file from one computer to another within their home that usage is not counted against their monthly usage allowance.”

The spokesperson said the Rogers customer service rep who said this is happening “was misinformed.” The company is asking customers to reach out to them directly if they have concerns about their account.

Whether or not the problem exists, it would only affect Rogers home customers who transfer large amounts of data on local area networks.

Another Reddit user who claimed they had “the exact same thing” happen to them said a faulty Rogers modem was to blame.

“Once they replaced the modem, I stopped getting charged for internal data,” Reddit user “MaxxDelusional” wrote.

But Rogers says usage collection and billing is not dependent on the type of modem a subscriber has.

"Customers who use a combination modem and router are not charged for any usage incurred internally," Rogers said. "With so many devices connected in the home, perhaps there is another device in their homes that’s connected to the internet."

More:
http://globalnews.ca/news/1072758/r...s-for-traffic-that-doesnt-use-their-networks/
 
听着不像真的。不经过modem的数据rogers是怎么记录的?每个电脑上都有rogers的软件?还是router是rogers提供的并且有问题?
 
我怀疑这几个用户用网上的云存储在电脑之间拷贝了。
 
听着不像真的。不经过modem的数据rogers是怎么记录的?每个电脑上都有rogers的软件?还是router是rogers提供的并且有问题?
You're a big boy now, you can read it again by yourself, the answer of your question it's in the article.
 
听着不像真的。不经过modem的数据rogers是怎么记录的?每个电脑上都有rogers的软件?还是router是rogers提供的并且有问题?

这么说吧

从rogers的角度来说,用modem做billing比他们自己做billing要容易

为什么呢,因为dsl是点对点的,而cable是点对多点的。
 
这么说吧

从rogers的角度来说,用modem做billing比他们自己做billing要容易

为什么呢,因为dsl是点对点的,而cable是点对多点的。
听fido的客服说他们手机的billing是手机做一个小时间段比如一天的billing然后上传统计。要是能找到数据存储的位置不是可以免费使用了?
 
听fido的客服说他们手机的billing是手机做一个小时间段比如一天的billing然后上传统计。要是能找到数据存储的位置不是可以免费使用了?

不可能,纯扯淡

手机billing都是后面运营商的活儿

alcatel 7750上个release修了个bug:traffic根据不同的type应该收费不同,之前的bug是有些traffic收费算错了(多了),实际让运营商多收了钱,这个release 修好了,结果运营商收钱变少了,结果反被运营商一通臭骂还赔了钱

哈哈哈
 
I think this is true. My network traffic got at least doubled since I upgraded my Rogers modem last year. Argued with them a couple times but they denied any fault on their side.
 
听着不像真的。不经过modem的数据rogers是怎么记录的?每个电脑上都有rogers的软件?还是router是rogers提供的并且有问题?
说的是modem和wifi router一体的那种吧 所以rogers的modem也看到LAN里面的流量了
 
后退
顶部