那些说CP干的不错的进来瞅瞅呗,INCOME SPLIT黄了

另一边报税时要多交多少税?托儿费是credit,不是deduction,懂了吧?:D
upload_2014-2-12_16-50-26.png



减收入!减收入!

看来你是真不懂!还敢跟人家CPA较劲儿:tx:
 
最后编辑:
浏览附件395697


减收入!减收入!

看来你是真不懂!
嗯看来你懂更多些。不过2万的收入减收入也拿不回多少托儿费。对不?有15%没?:D
赚这2万,至少1万多给政府和daycare了,没错吧!加上汽油费,餐费,早出晚归上班图个啥?
 
嗯看来你懂更多些。不过2万的收入减收入也拿不回多少托儿费。对不?有15%没?:D
赚这2万,至少1万多给政府和daycare了,没错吧!加上汽油费,餐费,早出晚归上班图个啥?

所以说2万的那个压根不该上班啊。
 
嗯看来你懂更多些。不过2万的收入减收入也拿不回多少托儿费。对不?有15%没?:D
赚这2万,至少1万多给政府和daycare了,没错吧!加上汽油费,餐费,早出晚归上班图个啥?
仁者见仁,智者见智。看孩子重要还是挣钱重要,各家的情况不同。2w+8w和5w+5w的家庭应该各有各的tax plan,没有统一格式,但我倾向有钱挣还是要去挣的,甭管是2w还是5w。
 
仁者见仁,智者见智。看孩子重要还是挣钱重要,各家的情况不同。2w+8w和5w+5w的家庭应该各有各的tax plan,没有统一格式,但我倾向有钱挣还是要去挣的,甭管是2w还是5w。
这话没错,但为啥同样10万家庭,同样勤奋工作,一家要比另一家多交税?有道理没有?
 
为啥同样10万家庭,同样勤奋工作,一家要比另一家多交税?有道理没有?
完全没有道理!
道理是,这样会减少税收。
PC给很多家庭画了个饼,马上有人跳出来反对。。。
 
"It's an interesting idea. I'm just one voice. It benefits some parts of the Canadian population a lot. And other parts of the Canadian population virtually not at all," Flaherty told reporters following an event in Ottawa.

"And I like to think I'm analytical as finance minister, so I will, when we discuss it eventually in cabinet, in caucus, I will present my analysis to my colleagues."

Earlier, Flaherty said the measure needs "a long, hard, analytical look" by experts "to see who it affects in this society and to what degree. Because I'm not sure that overall it benefits our society."

The Conservatives promised income splitting for couples with children under 18, a plan that would overwhelmingly benefit families where one adult has little to no income, such as a stay-at-home parent, and the other has a high income.

Other Conservative MPs, including Employment Minister Jason Kenney, said they still support the policy.

"The bottom line is it's about tax fairness for families so they don't get penalized," Kenney said after coming out of the party's weekly caucus meeting.

政治局会讨论,财长说是个人意见,还没有定数。
 
这话没错,但为啥同样10万家庭,同样勤奋工作,一家要比另一家多交税?有道理没有?
具体的让CPA们给算算到底有多大差别?:tx:让数据说理。
(我现在没有软件,用手算我可没那么大的热情)
 
后退
顶部