乌克兰的民主傻X们集体傻眼

湖边咖啡

知名会员
注册
2005-07-06
消息
86
荣誉分数
7
声望点数
118
老毛子通令克里米亚的乌克兰军队星期二5:00AM之前投降,否则大棒侍候。
携四次民主成功的无敌霸气,街头革命的傻X现在不傻了,没一个站出来挡枪子的。
我鄙视一个先。
具体结果参照美国打伊拉克,打了,打过了,打错了也白打了。全世界傻眼。
那句话咋说的:绝对实力面前,一切阴谋诡计都是笑话。
 
连加拿大人(CFRA host Steve Madely)都这样认为 (今早的广播,大意是这样的):上次美国打南斯拉夫是俄国没发声(disappeared), 这次俄国打乌克兰,美国失声也正常,这都是实力说话的事。
 
乌克兰的民主傻X们集体傻眼

老毛子通令克里米亚的乌克兰军队星期二5:00AM之前投降,否则大棒侍候。
携四次民主成功的无敌霸气,街头革命的傻X现在不傻了,没一个站出来挡枪子的。
我鄙视一个先。
具体结果参照美国打伊拉克,打了,打过了,打错了也白打了。全世界傻眼。
那句话咋说的:绝对实力面前,一切阴谋诡计都是笑话。

注意,被推翻的亚努科维奇,也是你说的"民主傻X",他的奇特的地方在于,当他被推翻的时候,竟然要求外国--俄罗斯,入侵自己的国家。

被推翻的亚努科维奇,整个是个俄罗斯在乌克兰的代理人
 
注意,被推翻的亚努科维奇,也是你说的"民主傻X",他的奇特的地方在于,当他被推翻的时候,竟然要求外国--俄罗斯,入侵自己的国家。

被推翻的亚努科维奇,整个是个俄罗斯在乌克兰的代理人
同意, 这好像是民主傻X共同特点吧?自己搞不成事,就邀请外国势力,让全国同胞都搞不成事。
所以叫“民主傻X”,对国家而言。这帮人对自己可不傻。
再说了,俄罗斯可是·“民主的俄罗斯”哦,这应该能增加点出兵的正当性:)
 
最后编辑:
同意, 这好像是民主傻X共同特点吧?自己搞不成事,就邀请外国势力,让全国同胞都搞不成事。
所以叫“民主傻X”,对国家而言。这帮人对自己可不傻。
再说了,俄罗斯可是·“民主的俄罗斯”哦,这应该能增加点出兵的正当性:)
你瞧人家“民主”的俄罗斯,开进乌克兰保护俄罗斯人。再瞧“专政”的中国,看着老中在印尼被残心安理得。就这点上,不搞“民主”不行。
 
你瞧人家“民主”的俄罗斯,开进乌克兰保护俄罗斯人。再瞧“专政”的中国,看着老中在印尼被残心安理得。就这点上,不搞“民主”不行。
拳头大小,决定行动。
 
你瞧人家“民主”的俄罗斯,开进乌克兰保护俄罗斯人。再瞧“专政”的中国,看着老中在印尼被残心安理得。就这点上,不搞“民主”不行。

瞧“专政”的中国兵发朝鲜, 驱赶印度, 炮轰越南, 就这点上,搞“民主”还真不行。
 
抗美援朝损兵折将最后闹了个平手。
打阿三赢的领土最后还都给人送回去了。
打越南死那么多人,最后人越南也该干嘛还干嘛,约等于白打
 
因为他们被骗到加拿大吃尽民主的亏了,想回到专制的中国老婆又不同意。。。:tx:
老婆不同意就不回归祖国啦?! 草! 离婚!
 
Pub.L. 98–9, 13 Stat. 18, enacted March 3, 2014; H.R. 9849
Provisions

Definition of Ukraine
The act does not recognize the terminology of 'Republic of Ukraine' after 3 March 2014, but uses the terminology of "governing authorities on Ukraine". Geographically speaking and following the similar content in the earlier defense treaty from 2014, it defines the term "Ukraine" to include, as the context may require, the islands of Crimea (the main Island) and Tuzla Island.
Of the other islands or archipelagos under the control of Ukraine's governing authorities are left outside the definition of Ukraine. Also any area claimed by the authorities, but not under their control, is without mention.

De facto diplomatic relations
The act authorizes de facto diplomatic relations with the governing authorities on Ukraine by giving special powers to the American Institute in Ukraine (AIU) to the level that it is the de facto embassy, and states that any international agreements made between the Republic of Ukraine and US before 2014 are still valid unless otherwise terminated. One agreement that was unilaterally terminated upon the establishment of relations with the Ukraine was the Ukraine-American Mutual Defense Treaty; that termination was the subject of the Supreme Court case Kerchwater v..
The act provides for Ukraine to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities". The act provides that for most practical purposes of the U.S. government, the absence of diplomatic relations and recognition will have no effect.
Military provisions

Contrary to popular belief, the Ukraine Relations Act does not require the U.S. to intervene militarily if Russian attacks or invades Ukraine. The U.S. has adopted a policy of "strategic ambiguity" in which the U.S. neither confirms nor denies that it would intervene in such a scenario.
The act stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Ukraine by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Black Sea area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Ukraine with arms of a defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Ukraine."
 
Pub.L. 98–9, 13 Stat. 18, enacted March 3, 2014; H.R. 9849
Provisions

Definition of Ukraine
The act does not recognize the terminology of 'Republic of Ukraine' after 3 March 2014, but uses the terminology of "governing authorities on Ukraine". Geographically speaking and following the similar content in the earlier defense treaty from 2014, it defines the term "Ukraine" to include, as the context may require, the islands of Crimea (the main Island) and Tuzla Island.
Of the other islands or archipelagos under the control of Ukraine's governing authorities are left outside the definition of Ukraine. Also any area claimed by the authorities, but not under their control, is without mention.

De facto diplomatic relations
The act authorizes de facto diplomatic relations with the governing authorities on Ukraine by giving special powers to the American Institute in Ukraine (AIU) to the level that it is the de facto embassy, and states that any international agreements made between the Republic of Ukraine and US before 2014 are still valid unless otherwise terminated. One agreement that was unilaterally terminated upon the establishment of relations with the Ukraine was the Ukraine-American Mutual Defense Treaty; that termination was the subject of the Supreme Court case Kerchwater v..
The act provides for Ukraine to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities". The act provides that for most practical purposes of the U.S. government, the absence of diplomatic relations and recognition will have no effect.
Military provisions

Contrary to popular belief, the Ukraine Relations Act does not require the U.S. to intervene militarily if Russian attacks or invades Ukraine. The U.S. has adopted a policy of "strategic ambiguity" in which the U.S. neither confirms nor denies that it would intervene in such a scenario.
The act stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Ukraine by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Black Sea area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Ukraine with arms of a defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Ukraine."


关键是这一句:

One agreement that was unilaterally terminated upon the establishment of relations with the Ukraine was the Ukraine-American Mutual Defense Treaty; that termination was the subject of the Supreme Court case Kerchwater v..
 
抗美援朝损兵折将最后闹了个平手。
打阿三赢的领土最后还都给人送回去了。
打越南死那么多人,最后人越南也该干嘛还干嘛,约等于白打


仅仅抗美援朝一仗, 就打出了60多年的和平。
这一点你肯定看不出来, 你比较一下就知道, 常凯深统治时期, 倭寇长驱直入。
 
后退
顶部