乌克兰的民主傻X们集体傻眼

Pub.L. 98–9, 13 Stat. 18, enacted March 3, 2014; H.R. 9849
Provisions

Definition of Ukraine
The act does not recognize the terminology of 'Republic of Ukraine' after 3 March 2014, but uses the terminology of "governing authorities on Ukraine". Geographically speaking and following the similar content in the earlier defense treaty from 2014, it defines the term "Ukraine" to include, as the context may require, the islands of Crimea (the main Island) and Tuzla Island.
Of the other islands or archipelagos under the control of Ukraine's governing authorities are left outside the definition of Ukraine. Also any area claimed by the authorities, but not under their control, is without mention.

De facto diplomatic relations
The act authorizes de facto diplomatic relations with the governing authorities on Ukraine by giving special powers to the American Institute in Ukraine (AIU) to the level that it is the de facto embassy, and states that any international agreements made between the Republic of Ukraine and US before 2014 are still valid unless otherwise terminated. One agreement that was unilaterally terminated upon the establishment of relations with the Ukraine was the Ukraine-American Mutual Defense Treaty; that termination was the subject of the Supreme Court case Kerchwater v..
The act provides for Ukraine to be treated under U.S. laws the same as "foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or similar entities". The act provides that for most practical purposes of the U.S. government, the absence of diplomatic relations and recognition will have no effect.
Military provisions

Contrary to popular belief, the Ukraine Relations Act does not require the U.S. to intervene militarily if Russian attacks or invades Ukraine. The U.S. has adopted a policy of "strategic ambiguity" in which the U.S. neither confirms nor denies that it would intervene in such a scenario.
The act stipulates that the United States will "consider any effort to determine the future of Ukraine by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes, a threat to the peace and security of the Black Sea area and of grave concern to the United States".
This act also requires the United States "to provide Ukraine with arms of a defensive character", and "to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people on Ukraine."

即日起,美国不承认乌克兰共和国,American Institute in Ukraine (AIU) 代替行使大使馆职能。

right? interesting.
 
即日起,美国不承认乌克兰共和国,American Institute in Ukraine (AIU) 代替行使大使馆职能。

right? interesting.

是啊, 是为了防止俄罗斯控制的乌克兰反制?
 
也造成了CFC一些傻X们集体发high.从上周末一直high到现在。
老毛子通令克里米亚的乌克兰军队星期二5:00AM之前投降,否则大棒侍候。
携四次民主成功的无敌霸气,街头革命的傻X现在不傻了,没一个站出来挡枪子的。
我鄙视一个先。
具体结果参照美国打伊拉克,打了,打过了,打错了也白打了。全世界傻眼。
那句话咋说的:绝对实力面前,一切阴谋诡计都是笑话。
 
仅仅抗美援朝一仗, 就打出了60多年的和平。
这一点你肯定看不出来, 你比较一下就知道, 常凯深统治时期, 倭寇长驱直入。
就打出了60多年的和平了吗? 珍宝岛,南海,打阿三,越南都是抗美援朝以后的事儿
 
是啊, 是为了防止俄罗斯控制的乌克兰反制?

外交姿态。加拿大不是召回大使么。
不能军事干预,总得喊几嗓子吧。
如果美国国会授权总统动用武装力量干预,那才有看头。还没有见到老美老毛子直接交火的精彩。
 
外交姿态。加拿大不是召回大使么。
不能军事干预,总得喊几嗓子吧。
如果美国国会授权总统动用武装力量干预,那才有看头。还没有见到老美老毛子直接交火的精彩。


你真那么有兴趣吗?
那2个国家都声明要首先使用核武器的!
 
你真那么有兴趣吗?
那2个国家都声明要首先使用核武器的!

我怕什么。

是就乌克兰局势说的么?
 
就打出了60多年的和平了吗? 珍宝岛,南海,打阿三,越南都是抗美援朝以后的事儿


珍宝岛,打阿三,越南, 又把60年延长。

南海怎么啦?
 
我怕什么。

是就乌克兰局势说的么?


如果美国成为核焦土, 加拿大能够独善其身?
 
如果美国成为核焦土, 加拿大能够独善其身?
比你还怕的人多得是。我就不怕了。
 
后退
顶部