- 注册
- 2003-04-13
- 消息
- 240,511
- 荣誉分数
- 37,754
- 声望点数
- 1,393
Never!
请介绍无线上网比较好的公司。我在用CIK，很卡。30M只给我1M。无法忍受。想换公司。谢谢。
- 主题发起人 iron tiger
- 开始时间
PCSK
知名会员
- 注册
- 2009-06-23
- 消息
- 173
- 荣誉分数
- 72
- 声望点数
- 138
用了CIK 几年，以前用电话线，现在用Cable。上纲+家庭电话+加拿大长途+电视，(另加$5 中港长途)，一个月連梲$62.14 。使用经验如下:
本地，加拿大长途和香港长途 --- 佳 (长途偶然会断线，沒打中国长途，但与在中国朋友Skype 没问题。)
上纲 (四台电脑上纲，其中两台看电影，一台纲遊，另外加智能电话和平板無线上纲) --- 可以接受，偶然要重敐modem。
电视 --- LeTV, PPS 不能看(用电脑看PPS 無问题)。Youtube 沒问题。CCTV 晚上卡，其他时间可以。一晩要重啟机上盒2 至 3 次。
客服 --- 我用线上chat，服务什佳，打电话则时好时坏，最近数月服务还可以。
如果能够忍受这些不便，用如此价钱得到如此服务，值得。
不想花太多錢在这事上，夠就好。
本地，加拿大长途和香港长途 --- 佳 (长途偶然会断线，沒打中国长途，但与在中国朋友Skype 没问题。)
上纲 (四台电脑上纲，其中两台看电影，一台纲遊，另外加智能电话和平板無线上纲) --- 可以接受，偶然要重敐modem。
电视 --- LeTV, PPS 不能看(用电脑看PPS 無问题)。Youtube 沒问题。CCTV 晚上卡，其他时间可以。一晩要重啟机上盒2 至 3 次。
客服 --- 我用线上chat，服务什佳，打电话则时好时坏，最近数月服务还可以。
如果能够忍受这些不便，用如此价钱得到如此服务，值得。
不想花太多錢在这事上，夠就好。
eric.jiang
初级会员
- 注册
- 2013-05-23
- 消息
- 1,239
- 荣誉分数
- 232
- 声望点数
- 73
eric.jiang
初级会员
- 注册
- 2013-05-23
- 消息
- 1,239
- 荣誉分数
- 232
- 声望点数
- 73
不知道CIK的FTTN如何，我个人不喜欢cable网络，还是电话网好些
- 注册
- 2009-09-13
- 消息
- 2,990
- 荣誉分数
- 599
- 声望点数
- 273
我自己用Bell 25M fibe，感觉还不错。感觉Bell的性价比比Rogers的好些，当然从Rogers能要到好的折扣价的情况除外。说白了就是，感觉Rogers更贵些。还有就是其他网友说的，Apartment用Rogers的带宽损失问题。
小公司确实有时候服务、硬件设施的支持和维护跟不上，因为他们本身还是寄生在大的ISP的硬件设施上，能力有限，本身也受盘剥，小公司能黑一笔就先黑一笔的情况确实有。同情你的情况，换个大公司的计划吧。往年在圣诞和年底之间，是这些ISP促销抢客户的时段，赶紧打电话问问Bell或者Rogers或者teksavvy，可能有好的deal。或者问问二手市场的万通电讯吧，他们做了很久的网络计划。
iron tiger
知名会员
- 注册
- 2004-03-03
- 消息
- 783
- 荣誉分数
- 3
- 声望点数
- 128
我没有你幸运。我用得流量也不多，虽然我买的是30M无限流量。
mianfei
本站元老
- 注册
- 2002-04-06
- 消息
- 7,207
- 荣誉分数
- 1,771
- 声望点数
- 373
mianfei
本站元老
- 注册
- 2002-04-06
- 消息
- 7,207
- 荣誉分数
- 1,771
- 声望点数
- 373
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_Hi-Speed_Internet
Throttling
BitTorrent traffic was restricted through bandwidth throttling using the SCE-2020, and in later years, the SCE-8000 from Cisco Systems Inc, which had caused complaints as users felt Rogers was overstepping their bounds as a service provider and despite Rogers advertising their service "for sharing large files and much more". Rogers had previously denied such allegations, despite widespread reports of the issue. Further controversy arose when in May 2007, Rogers began throttling all encrypted file transfers allegedly to combat BitTorrent traffic, but affecting all encrypted transfers regardless if they are BitTorrent traffic or not.[14] [15]
In January 2011, the CRTC issued a letter to Rogers stating it was breaking CRTC policy by not "indicat[ing] that there are circumstances whereby the Rogers ITMP will also affect download speeds available to subscribers." [16] Despite the letter from the CRTC, Rogers still had not updated their policy pages as of February 4, 2011, and continued throttling all non-whitelisted internet traffic (no longer just P2P) for up to 15 minutes after P2P had been disabled. Several games had been caught up in this more restrictive throttling as Rogers was incorrectly detecting them as P2P, and had also been slow to fix it despite offers of assistance from customers, and game manufacturers. [17]
On May 31, 2011, Rogers filed that they had resolved the World of Warcraft throttling, however they had only resolved it on their testing equipment, as users were still experiencing throttling.[18] This resulted in the CRTC ordering testing done by Rogers, and the CRTC providing the complainant (Teresa Murphy) a redacted copy of the Rogers testing. On September 22, 2011, the CRTC released Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2011-609, which set out new steps for complaints, and allowed for the World of Warcraft complaint to be sent to the CRTC Enforcements division. While the World of Warcraft complaint was then closed as it was resolved, the creators of the WoW complaint created a new one, which was then sent to Enforcements division, who then began looking into Rogers' throttling practices, and found additional[19] non-compliance.[20]
After Bell announced they were ending throttling in December 2011,[21] and the CRTC Enforcement division finding another violation of CRTC throttling policy in January 2012, Rogers announced on Feb 6, 2012 that they were ending throttling on their network by the end of 2012.[22]
Throttling
BitTorrent traffic was restricted through bandwidth throttling using the SCE-2020, and in later years, the SCE-8000 from Cisco Systems Inc, which had caused complaints as users felt Rogers was overstepping their bounds as a service provider and despite Rogers advertising their service "for sharing large files and much more". Rogers had previously denied such allegations, despite widespread reports of the issue. Further controversy arose when in May 2007, Rogers began throttling all encrypted file transfers allegedly to combat BitTorrent traffic, but affecting all encrypted transfers regardless if they are BitTorrent traffic or not.[14] [15]
In January 2011, the CRTC issued a letter to Rogers stating it was breaking CRTC policy by not "indicat[ing] that there are circumstances whereby the Rogers ITMP will also affect download speeds available to subscribers." [16] Despite the letter from the CRTC, Rogers still had not updated their policy pages as of February 4, 2011, and continued throttling all non-whitelisted internet traffic (no longer just P2P) for up to 15 minutes after P2P had been disabled. Several games had been caught up in this more restrictive throttling as Rogers was incorrectly detecting them as P2P, and had also been slow to fix it despite offers of assistance from customers, and game manufacturers. [17]
On May 31, 2011, Rogers filed that they had resolved the World of Warcraft throttling, however they had only resolved it on their testing equipment, as users were still experiencing throttling.[18] This resulted in the CRTC ordering testing done by Rogers, and the CRTC providing the complainant (Teresa Murphy) a redacted copy of the Rogers testing. On September 22, 2011, the CRTC released Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2011-609, which set out new steps for complaints, and allowed for the World of Warcraft complaint to be sent to the CRTC Enforcements division. While the World of Warcraft complaint was then closed as it was resolved, the creators of the WoW complaint created a new one, which was then sent to Enforcements division, who then began looking into Rogers' throttling practices, and found additional[19] non-compliance.[20]
After Bell announced they were ending throttling in December 2011,[21] and the CRTC Enforcement division finding another violation of CRTC throttling policy in January 2012, Rogers announced on Feb 6, 2012 that they were ending throttling on their network by the end of 2012.[22]
