看来,我说78天的竞选期是哈珀策略性的失误没错

  • 主题发起人 主题发起人 ccc
  • 开始时间 开始时间

ccc

难得糊涂
管理成员
VIP
注册
2003-04-13
消息
240,598
荣誉分数
37,773
声望点数
1,393
Did Harper give Trudeau too much time to get 'ready'?
James Mennie, Montreal Gazette
More from James Mennie, Montreal Gazette

Published on: October 16, 2015 | Last Updated: October 16, 2015 7:19 AM EDT
stephen-harper-justin-trudeau.jpeg


Conservative Leader Stephen Harper, right, and Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau shake hands following the Munk Debate on Canada's foreign policy in Toronto, on Monday, Sept. 28, 2015. Did Harper's strategy that long campaign would favour the Conservatives backfire? MARK BLINCH / REUTERS

By the time this column is posted we will be beginning Day 76 of a 79-day election campaign, the last 10 of which probably being the only ones that actually got your attention. Those 10 days certainly got Stephen Harper’s attention, if only because a growing number of polls suggest Justin Trudeau, the Liberal leader who was perceived as the Conservatives’ main political target when this campaign began last Aug. 2, is enjoying a growing momentum of support among voters sufficient to propel him into Harper’s job and the Liberals into what some are forecasting will be a “strong minority” government.

Of course the only poll that matters is that conducted of the electorate on voting day, and opinion surveys have been wrong – sometimes drastically, jaw droppingly wrong – before. But it’s intriguing to note the same polling establishment that now suggests the Liberals are poised to form a minority government found that Harper’s Conservatives were within striking distance of a potential majority on Sept. 22, which is to say just 51 days after Harper asked the governor-general to dissolve Parliament. Of course nothing lasts forever, and in the three weeks since Sept. 22, the Liberals have swapped the statistical lead with the Tories on an almost daily basis while Tom Mulcair and the NDP watched their chances statistically evaporate with each passing day.

Then, on the Saturday of Thanksgiving weekend, 70 days after the election call, the Liberals seemed to be genuinely breaking away from the Tories in the daily Nanos poll conducted for CTV as well as in a Forum poll published in the Toronto Star. On Tuesday of this week, Day 73, an Ekos poll seemed to confirm the Liberal momentum was not a 48-hour fluke (and also the the Tories were losing ground) as did an Ipsos survey published the same day. And yesterday, Day 75, the latest Nano poll suggested there was no sign of the Liberal momentum slowing while one analyst suggests the Liberals might sweep ridings in metro Toronto, the very piece of political real estate that sent the Harper Tories into a majority in 2011.

All of which brings us back to Day 51, and whether in that last full week of September someone in the Conservative war room may have felt a twinge of regret when they saw those ever so promising poll numbers.

When Harper called the election back in August, the conventional wisdom was that he was doing so because the Tories were rolling in dough and had the financial wherewithal to wage a relentless campaign over the course of nearly three months, compelling the Liberals and NDP to answer dollar for dollar every Conservative salvo and, in doing so, exhausting their war chests well before election day. Problem is, it didn’t quite work out that way, as the opposition parties husbanded their campaign funding and didn’t really start to spend until last month. The early call also forced Harper to spend August dealing with questions – relentlessly posed at every campaign stop – about the revelations produced during the last leg of the breach of trust trial of senator Mike Duffy, a Harper appointee whose case required the much anticipated testimony of Nigel Wright, Harper’s former chief of staff, concerning a personal, $90,000 cheque Wright wrote to Duffy to cover the latter’s apparently iffy expenses.

Those 79 days also allowed the leaders to participate in five debates (only two of which were aired on network television and that in French only). And while Trudeau’s lack of experience with this sort of thing was apparent during the first debate organized by Maclean’s Magazine on Aug. 6 (Day 4), what also showed up was an apparent passion for taking the verbal fight to Harper, a zest that was honed and used increasingly in the debates that followed.

At this point it’s interesting to note that while there is no maximum time allotted for a federal election campaign period, the minimum has been established at 36 days – just 15 days short of what appeared to be that statistical sweet spot for the Tories back in September, and 43 less than were spent to finally get us to the ballot boxes this Monday.

Does Harper regret pulling the trigger so early on this election campaign? Probably. Because even if the plan was to bankrupt his adversaries’ ability to finance their campaigns, in doing so, the prime minister gave those adversaries, particularly Trudeau, something infinitely more valuable. Time.

After beginning this 79-day campaign as longshot, the odds this week on the Liberals have narrowed dramatically, and when I say “dramatically,” I mean that quite literally.

Over the course of this campaign, Trudeau’s past as a drama teacher has been jeered at by his opponents and his conduct during the debates dismissed by some as theatrical. But if the latest polls are to be believed, it seems the Liberal leader’s not just been campaigning, he’s been successfully auditioning for the most important job in the country.

And thanks to Harper’s 79-day campaign, it looks like as if Trudeau had plenty of time to rehearse.
 
唉,他为什么来个78天,史上最长的竞选期?他是有考虑的。

聪明反被聪明误。

548173
废话,他当然是觉得对自己有利才那样干的
结果是浪费大家的钱,自己还没得利
 
这都是命呀!

大选前(和大选前期),民调是倾向保守党的啊。短点儿的竞选期明摆着对LIB不利。。

回头看看,竞选开始多久Trudeau才拿出个竞选纲领、多长时间才上路啊。
 
废话,他当然是觉得对自己有利才那样干的
结果是浪费大家的钱,自己还没得利
天意啊。:D
 
大选前(和大选前期),民调是倾向保守党的啊。短点儿的竞选期明摆着对LIB不利。。

回头看看,竞选开始多久Trudeau才拿出个竞选纲领、多长时间才上路啊。
其实他开始把TOM当头号大敌,justin基本没放在眼里。。。。
 
其实他开始把TOM当头号大敌,justin基本没放在眼里。。。。

是滴。错误地认识加拿大选民。
 
只看nanopoll, 选举还没结束.
长竞选估计是为了拖垮自由党, 任何一党垮了, 都会分票.
哈勃的策略没错, 他希望自由党先夸掉, 分票能有不少回归保守党.
只是, 没有预计到, 最后是NDP先倒. 极左选民分票大多数被自由党收了.

最让人想不到的估计还是自由党不够意思, 肆意抢夺NDP的左政地盘(比如大麻). 所以老木和NDP死忠, 现在恨死自由党了. 哈哈, 三国演义.

自由党是新NDP.
 
身边有点本事的都离他而去,连我这样的保守党死忠都看他越来越烦,他不下台谁下台?

这是党内症结所在,孤家寡人了。从保守党出来参选的人就能看出来。
 
典型的positive compaigne 完胜 negative 的范例 这点上justin 和他的团队是值得称赞的!当然最终的功劳还是 we canadian voters 历史也会公正的评价 [emoji3]
 
只看nanopoll, 选举还没结束.
长竞选估计是为了拖垮自由党, 任何一党垮了, 都会分票.
哈勃的策略没错, 他希望自由党先夸掉, 分票能有不少回归保守党.
只是, 没有预计到, 最后是NDP先倒. 极左选民分票大多数被自由党收了.

最让人想不到的估计还是自由党不够意思, 肆意抢夺NDP的左政地盘(比如大麻). 所以老木和NDP死忠, 现在恨死自由党了. 哈哈, 三国演义.

自由党是新NDP.
长竞选估计是为了拖垮自由党? oh I have to say you wrong again
 
后退
顶部