OK, How about 反对大麻娱乐合法化。因为政府除了收钱,根本控制不住。

贵圈

政府都对党
注册
2014-10-21
消息
32,835
荣誉分数
6,165
声望点数
373
杀人恶法:大麻驾驶也许不如酒驾那么致命,大麻合法化依然增加了N多亡魂。
Fatal car crashes triple among drivers high on marijuana after legalization in Colorado; double in Washington state

PAMELA FAYERMAN
More from Pamela Fayerman

Published on: October 31, 2016 | Last Updated: October 31, 2016 4:30 PM PDT
images-for-blair-qualey-column-of-driving-under-the-influenc.jpeg


A man rolls a joint while sitting in a vehicle. FOTOLIA

SHAREADJUSTCOMMENTin an opinion piece in the B.C. Medical Journal, which he wrote on behalf of the council.

Indeed, marijuana is the most frequently detected drug in crash-involved drivers, after alcohol. So while the Canadian government intends to legalize recreational use of marijuana in 2017, studies are indicating that road safety concerns must be considered in the consequences, he said. And various levels of governments must find ways to mitigate the risks of driving while impaired by marijuana.

“Canadian discussions around the legalization of marijuana must include a clear-headed assessment regarding the impact of legalization on road safety. We must create a scientifically sound and fair approach … standards and penalties to enforce any new laws,” Rumball said.

Apart from more deaths related to stoned drivers, Rumball cites the lack of any scientifically proven and practical roadside testing tools for police which means that sobriety testing is left to only the most highly trained officers. When police suspect a driver is drug-impaired, they can demand a Field Sobriety Test. If the driver fails, they can be compelled to go to a police station for further evaluation and ordered to submit a blood, urine or saliva sample.

The cumbersome process has been highlighted by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, which has called the increase in fatal crashes involving marijuana alarming.

“Washington serves as an eye-opening case study for what other states may experience with road safety after legalizing the drug,” said Peter Kissinger, foundation CEO.

Roadside and other testing is problematic because of a lack of scientifically valid tests and lack of consistency tying impairment to levels of marijuana metabolites in the blood. Marijuana affects people differently; frequent users may have persistently high levels of the drug long after use while drug levels can fall rapidly in occasional users. Rumball said while the most common standard used to label drivers as marijuana-impaired is 5 ng/mL, such levels vary significantly among jurisdictions. THC, the main psychoactive ingredient, is fat soluble, which means it is hard to tie a person’s current state of impairment to a certain blood level.

Dr. Jeffrey Brubacher, a Vancouver General Hospital ER specialist who has done extensive research on impaired driving, said that while some may take issue with the American statistics or study designs, the increase in crashes and fatalities are disconcerting.

“And when marijuana is legalized, there will be an increase in crashes, injuries and fatalities,” Brubacher said.

Brubacher, who was not involved in Rumball’s piece, said there are about 80 specially trained police in B.C. who are drug recognition experts and law enforcement agencies should think about training far more for the post cannabis legalization era because roadside testing will be the greatest deterrent to marijuana-impaired driving.

“We probably need to give police extra authority to do random drug testing because right now, people do not believe they will get caught,” he said.

In research published in the British Medical Journal earlier this year, Brubacher and his co-authors showed the results from crash patients sent to seven trauma hospital centres in B.C. from 2010 to 2012. Study participants were drivers who had a blood test within six hours of a crash. Overall, 40.1 per cent of drivers injured tested positive for alcohol or at least one other drug and 12.7 per cent tested positive for more than one impairing substance.

Brubacher said while alcohol is involved in about a third of serious motor vehicle accidents resulting in severe injuries or deaths “We do know a stoned driver is safer than a drunk driver.”

“But a sober driver is still the safest,” he said.

pfayerman@postmedia.com
 
像控制烟酒一样控制大麻不就齐活了!
 
从一开始政府的想法就是与其让贩毒的赚钱,不如让我赚。我周围一些白人也是这想法,压根不觉得是坏事,压根不担心青少年的问题,估计白人青少年吸大麻也是司空见惯的,倒是周围中国的,韩国的家长都很担心。
 
像控制烟酒一样控制大麻不就齐活了!
像控制烟酒一样控制大麻不就齐活了!
王姐,咱不能不很傻很天真的吗?没好处的东西为啥要放出去?酒烟,那是历史遗留。没办法。非要再放出另一个恶?
 
王姐,咱不能不很傻很天真的吗?没好处的东西为啥要放出去?酒烟,那是历史遗留。没办法。非要再放出另一个恶?
税收也是好处啊!
 
嗯 穷疯了。那国家的前途人民的生命做代价。
 
政府想钱想疯了
 
要说这税收,无非是拿去填补其他亏空。

这笔帐不是这么算的。
大麻会大幅度增加健康保险,社会安全,交通管理,等等等的社会成本。
大麻带来的税收能不能填补带来的损失都不一定。
这些成本和所有的负面问题,最后就是老百姓默默吞了。更多的孩子们将面临更多的脑健康问题。将来全是bob marley?

政府他妈的也就是账面上光鲜。实际上,破坏民生之恶法。
 
最后编辑:
政府卖海洛因得了,好处大大地有!
要说这税收,无非是拿去填补其他亏空。

这笔帐不是这么算的。
大麻会大幅度增加健康保险,社会安全,交通管理,等等等的社会成本。
大麻带来的税收能不能填补带来的损失都不一定。
这些成本和所有的负面问题,最后就是老百姓默默吞了。更多的孩子们将面临更多的脑健康问题。将来全是bob marley?

政府他妈的也就是账面上光鲜。实际上,破坏民生之恶法。

那奏干脆点儿,来个全民公投,过与不过,都是民意!
 
那奏干脆点儿,来个全民公投,过与不过,都是民意!
这种事情,在加拿大不可能全民公投。 不过上次大选,这是一个重要议题,结果已经有了。中国人反对,没用。
 
幸好这文章不是中文的,否则,又要被说成“中文媒体”了。政治就是协商,你不反对就是放弃。反对就有机会。这一届不行,还有下一届。
 
后退
顶部