房子贬值只是理由之一。它也是一个很好的理由。民主社会的升斗小民为自己的财产抗争很正常。其它几条比如说“- Wrong location" 和 “Rezoning Trend Setting”需要更详细说明一下才有说服力。
Please find in the attached our appeal reasons to OMB:
Phase II: The rezoning of the land from Agricultural to Institutional represents an inappropriate use for the subject land which is designated Low Density Residential in the Official Plan. This is particularly true as the Applicant has expressed intentions to construct a new, larger spiritual building on the lands in the future. The matter of converting a single-detached house into a place of worship is premature before the whole project is evaluated for traffic, noise, parking, environmental concerns a functional servicing study, an urban design brief and site plan, sustainability etc. The City of Waterloo should not approve to rezone part of the lot without knowing what the rest of the lot will look like in terms of the Official Plan, Zoning for the whole site, Site Plan provisions etc.
The use of a Holding (“H”) provision with respect to the future proposal has the effect of approving a future place of worship while taking away the rights of concerned residents to voice their concerns or appeal it. A Holding (“H”) provision that effectively approves a larger future development (even though removal is subject to the completion of additional technical studies) is premature, inappropriate and does not represent good planning. Issues that are relevant to the suitability of the proposed zoning and that deal with potential impacts to others should not be left to a holding provision.
- Traffic concerns with respect to Erbsville Road;
- Parking concerns – lack of parking to accommodate proposed use;
- Noise concerns associated with special events and celebrations;
- Adequacy of services for proposed use;
- Wrong location;
- Decrease of Property Value; and
- Rezoning Trend Setting.
Phase I: The City of Waterloo permitted the existing structures to be used for spiritual uses before updated specifics whether they are of sufficient size or whether they conform with the building code for its proposed uses. This practice raised concerns in terms of health and safety of the uses proposed and the potential occupants, including, but not limited to the following aspects, emergency and fire plan, the building capacity, stormwater management, site access, sidewalk safety & turning vehicles issues, parking issue, and negative environmental impacts from the proposed septic tank.
Please find in the attached our appeal reasons to OMB:
Phase II: The rezoning of the land from Agricultural to Institutional represents an inappropriate use for the subject land which is designated Low Density Residential in the Official Plan. This is particularly true as the Applicant has expressed intentions to construct a new, larger spiritual building on the lands in the future. The matter of converting a single-detached house into a place of worship is premature before the whole project is evaluated for traffic, noise, parking, environmental concerns a functional servicing study, an urban design brief and site plan, sustainability etc. The City of Waterloo should not approve to rezone part of the lot without knowing what the rest of the lot will look like in terms of the Official Plan, Zoning for the whole site, Site Plan provisions etc.
The use of a Holding (“H”) provision with respect to the future proposal has the effect of approving a future place of worship while taking away the rights of concerned residents to voice their concerns or appeal it. A Holding (“H”) provision that effectively approves a larger future development (even though removal is subject to the completion of additional technical studies) is premature, inappropriate and does not represent good planning. Issues that are relevant to the suitability of the proposed zoning and that deal with potential impacts to others should not be left to a holding provision.
- Traffic concerns with respect to Erbsville Road;
- Parking concerns – lack of parking to accommodate proposed use;
- Noise concerns associated with special events and celebrations;
- Adequacy of services for proposed use;
- Wrong location;
- Decrease of Property Value; and
- Rezoning Trend Setting.
Phase I: The City of Waterloo permitted the existing structures to be used for spiritual uses before updated specifics whether they are of sufficient size or whether they conform with the building code for its proposed uses. This practice raised concerns in terms of health and safety of the uses proposed and the potential occupants, including, but not limited to the following aspects, emergency and fire plan, the building capacity, stormwater management, site access, sidewalk safety & turning vehicles issues, parking issue, and negative environmental impacts from the proposed septic tank.
最后编辑:
