同意。楼主似乎过度的考虑了周围的影响而没有对孩子自身主动性给予足够的重视。这样盲目的找学校,吃苦的时候在后头。高中大部分都是靠自己。
谢谢提醒。我们基本还是比较注意孩子的主观能动性,现在是除主观之外,再考虑一下客观外部环境的问题。

同意。楼主似乎过度的考虑了周围的影响而没有对孩子自身主动性给予足够的重视。这样盲目的找学校,吃苦的时候在后头。高中大部分都是靠自己。
拿高中和国内的大学比,你这哲学也是和小地主的数学一个老师教的?![]()
还是你好读读怎么类比吧,别弄篇破文章就来这唬人。国内大学的学生来自全国,村里中学的学生基本都是村里的孩子。国内大学和村里的中学的江湖地位不可同日而语,不在一个江湖。大学招的学生是高中毕业的学生。所以,你那么类比是个笑话。王麻油同学,你真得学点哲学。
Analogy
Today we begin the final component of our study of logic, a survey of the most common methods of inductive reasoning. Although inductive inferences never guarantee the truth of their conclusions, as valid deductive inferences do, we can evaluate them by considering how each could be made stronger or weaker by the addition of further information.
argument by analogy, which takes note of the fact that two or more things are similar in some respects and concludes that they are probably also similar in some further respect. Not every analogy is an argument; we frequently use such comparisons simply to explain or illustrate what we mean. But arguments by analogy are common, too.
Suppose, for example, that I am thinking about buying a new car. I'm very likely to speak with other people who have recently bought new cars, noting their experiences with various makes, models, and dealers. If I discover that three of my friends have recently bought Geo Prizms from Burg and that all three have been delighted with their purchases, then I will conclude by analogy that if I buy a Geo Prizm from Burg, I will be delighted, too.
[Evaluating Analogies]
Of course, this argument is not deductively valid; it is always possible that my new car may turn out to be an exception. But there are several considerations that clearly matter in determining the relative strength or weakness of my inductive inference:
- Number of instances. If five friends instead of three report their satisfaction with the model I intend to buy, that tends to make it even more likely that I will be satisfied, too. In general, more instances strengthen an analogy; fewer weaken it.
- Instance variety. If my three friends bought their Prizms from three different dealers but were all delighted, then my conclusion is somewhat more likely to be true, no matter where I decide to buy mine. In general, the more variety there is among the instances, the stronger the analogical argument becomes.
- Number of similarities. If my new purchase is not only the same make and model from the same dealer but also has the same engine, then my conclusion is more likely to be true. In general, the more similarities there are between the instances and my conclusion, the better for the analogical argument.
- Relevance. Of course, the criteria we're considering apply only if the matters with which they are concerned are relevant to the argument. Ordinarily, for example, we would assume that the day of the week on which a car was purchased is irrelevant to a buyer's satisfaction with it. But relevance is not something about which we can be terribly precise; it is always possible in principle to tell a story in the context of which anything may turn out to be relevant. So we just have to use our best judgment in deciding whether or not some respect deserves to be considered.
- Number of dissimilarities. If my friends all bought Geos with automatic transmissions and I plan to buy a Geo with a standard transmission, then the conclusion that I will be delighted with my purchase is a little less likely to be true. In general, the fewer dissimilarities between instances and conclusion, the better an analogical argument is.
- Modesty of conclusion. If all three of my friends were delighted with their auto purchases but I conclude only that I will be satisfied with mine, then this relatively modest conclusion is more likely to be true. In general, arguments by analogy are improved when their conclusions are modest with respect to their premises.
The Globe and Mail 道听途说? Read the following, link included:
Starting this fall, public and private schools in Ontario that offer the IB diploma program will change the way they calculate percentage marks that are based on results of IB final exams and course work. The intent is to assign higher high-school percentage grades so that IB graduates do not miss out on university spots and scholarships.
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/ne...17953433/?ref=http://www.theglobeandmail.com&
Eh, eh, wait a second. CFC is not Chinatown, just Cantonese or Mandarin. Same as you, we can not only read but comprehend English.I read your link and couldn't find out any so-called inflating IB marks etc. I suggest people read the article and comprehend it holistically.
Let see what The University of British Columbia, associate registrar of undergraduate admissions, Andrew Arida said:"The IB is a very strong curriculum and even students who get grades that are not at the highest ends of the IB ... still perform very well in university,".
On curriculum level comparison, here is quote from the article:" In the Ontario curriculum, for example, an English class would involve reading a book and describing the relationship between characters, whereas an IB student would do an analysis on how the author crafted this relationship.
还是你好读读怎么类比吧,别弄篇破文章就来这唬人。国内大学的学生来自全国,村里中学的学生基本都是村里的孩子。国内大学和村里的中学的江湖地位不可同日而语,不在一个江湖。大学招的学生是高中毕业的学生。所以,你那么类比是个笑话。
如果你非要用国内熟悉的学校来形容村里毕业生水平的话,你得这么说:村里GP的学生基本去向是包括北大清华在内的所有一本。CB IBP的学生的基本去向是包括北大清华在内的所有一本和二本。饿马吃的学生的基本去向是浙大, 上海交大等一本,所有二本以及所有大中专学校,还有少量饿马吃毕业生无学可上,偶尔也有饿马吃毕业生能进入北大清华深造。