至少你可以要求对方给你contractor的信息然后你直接和contractor联系了解情况吧?
这点儿诚意都没有,直接告诉对方退款撕单。窝村房子多的是。
这个我们试过了,contractor不愿意说,让我们找中介去问。
至少你可以要求对方给你contractor的信息然后你直接和contractor联系了解情况吧?
这点儿诚意都没有,直接告诉对方退款撕单。窝村房子多的是。
"在交割之前买家反悔押金都得无条件退"??
Absolutely wrong! After the property purchasing contract was signed by both parties and all listed conditions met, if the buyer refuses to take the house in closing day, not only the seller can keep the 押金, he can further sue the buyer for any losses caused by the buyer's failing to fulfil the contract.
On the other hand, according to Canadian civil law, even after the transaction is over, the buyer can still sue seller for any loss or damage caused by property issues that should have been disclosed by the seller.
卖房时房主有个 discloser声明,这家明显隐瞒事实。经纪或律师应该能给你解释可以用什么手段停止执行合同。
另外 ,如果想买下来,是不是问问这个维修的质保是否能转给下一个屋主?不能的话不接受。
6千,不是6万6,楼主顶得住Even if 这家明显隐瞒事实, "停止执行合同" is never as easy as you thought. After all, the seller's interest must also be protected otherwise we will see too many buyers walk away from signed contracts (for unsound reasons). In most cases, only a court can finally decide if the buyer's claim about "明显隐瞒事实" is justified or not, because situations can be very complicated.
‘’九月份发现问题 ,十一月份上市卖,整个过程卖方没有提过一个字,不知道算不算隐瞒。‘’Even if 这家明显隐瞒事实, "停止执行合同" is never as easy as you thought. After all, the seller's interest must also be protected otherwise we will see too many buyers walk away from signed contracts (for unsound reasons). In most cases, only a court can finally decide if the buyer's claim about "明显隐瞒事实" is justified or not, because situations can be very complicated.
直接show up去看。不让进屋就在外边看。![]()
Even if 这家明显隐瞒事实, "停止执行合同" is never as easy as you thought. After all, the seller's interest must also be protected otherwise we will see too many buyers walk away from signed contracts (for unsound reasons). In most cases, only a court can finally decide if the buyer's claim about "明显隐瞒事实" is justified or not, because situations can be very complicated.
这样的房子一定不能要! 押金可以再想办法往回追。