我今天才知道这规定

[西城大妈]

别“吧”呀！ 可以就可以， 不行就不行， 我是真的不知道， 所以才问问的。

2+

 

[我来说两句]

曾经有人在副驾驶座位绑了一个玩具熊？好像，穿戴化妆像个人样，在2+车道跑了几次，后来被警察看懂了

 

[他乡枫叶]

感觉要求乘客有驾照的说法比较合理。合用车道的目的是减少出行车辆的数量。乘客没有驾照，也就没有车，和你share也无法达到减少出行车辆的目的。

 

[Teddy]

创收不择手段，再加上业务不精

听起来好像钻牛角尖外边了

 

[飘在加国]

感觉要求乘客有驾照的说法比较合理。合用车道的目的是减少出行车辆的数量。乘客没有驾照，也就没有车，和你share也无法达到减少出行车辆的目的。

No, first of all that's NOT what the law said. But just for fun follow your logic the condition is completely unenforceable, passengers do not have to show a drivers' licence, it is a violation of their rights to be required to.
Plus, a person(officer) viewing the car from the outside has no idea if the passenger has a licence or not. Thus, police would have to pull over EVERY car, to check.

One last question, do you think school bus carrying kids can’t use it as well?

 

[他乡枫叶]

No, first of all that's NOT what the law said. But just for fun follow your logic the condition is completely unenforceable, passengers do not have to show a drivers' licence, it is a violation of their rights to be required to.
Plus, a person(officer) viewing the car from the outside has no idea if the passenger has a licence or not. Thus, police would have to pull over EVERY car, to check.

One last question, do you think school bus carrying kids can’t use it as well?

I was just providing an interpretation to the situation.
The law requires drivers to carry driver licenses, does which mean police has to pull over EVERY car to check for licenses?
Does school bus belong to the BUS category?

 

[飘在加国]

I was just providing an interpretation to the situation.
The law requires drivers to carry driver licenses, does which mean police has to pull over EVERY car to check for licenses?
Does school bus belong to the BUS category?

The interpretation of the situation is the police officer was wrong, end of the story.

 

[飞来客]

法国人做事，come see come such la.

 

[他乡枫叶]

The interpretation of the situation is the police officer was wrong, end of the story.

Doesn't matter; this is chatting, not defending.
I was more interested in making fun of your silly reasoning.

 

[飘在加国]

Doesn't matter; this is chatting, not defending.
I was more interested in making fun of your silly reasoning.

You don't even have a real argument, there was no point reply to your childish question.

 

[他乡枫叶]

You don't even have a real argument, there was no point reply to your childish question.

Whose logic or question is childish or silly?

You said "Plus, a person(officer) viewing the car from the outside has no idea if the passenger has a licence or not. Thus, police would have to pull over EVERY car, to check."
I used this to refute you: The law requires drivers to carry driver licenses, does which mean police has to pull over EVERY car to check for licenses?

you said "One last question, do you think school bus carrying kids can’t use it as well?"
I returned you with this: Does school bus belong to the BUS category?

End of story.