Hydro One Board of Director 全体辞职,CEO退休

本帖由 uestcca1012018-07-11 发布。版面名称:渥太华华人论坛

  1. ccc

    ccc 难得糊涂 ID:6614 管理成员 VIP

    注册:
    2003-04-13
    帖子:
    200,926
    支持:
    29,870
    声望:
    1,393
    金钱:
    $62,023
    upload_2018-7-11_23-36-4.png

    Doug Ford has fired Ontario’s chief scientist, sacked the government’s investment czar, terminated its top business adviser, and sidelined Hydro One’s leadership in rapid succession.

    But there’s one public servant to whom Ford can’t say, “You’re fired!”

    [​IMG]
    Environmental Commissioner of Ontario Dianne Saxe is an independent officer of the legislature and can only be dismissed by MPPs with cause. But even if she hasn’t given them reason to remove her, the Progressive Conservative majority has handed her a cause celebre — carbon pricing, Martin Regg Cohn writes. (Frank Gunn / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

    Ontario’s Environmental Commissioner, Dianne Saxe, doesn’t serve at the pleasure of the premier.

    As an independent officer of the legislature, she can only be dismissed by MPPs with cause. But even if she hasn’t given them any cause to remove her, the Progressive Conservative majority has surely handed her a cause celebre — carbon pricing.

    As the Earth’s temperature rises, the fight over global warming is heating up inexorably at Queen’s Park. By shutting down Ontario’s cap-and-trade system on the pretence of saving people a few pennies at the pump, Ford’s Tories are not only clearing the way for unrestricted greenhouse gas emissions, they are opening the door to potential penalties.

    And long-term pain for short-term gain. With Ford’s government vowing to oppose any federal carbon tax, it is now doing everything in its power to do nothing about global warming.

    What next?

    “I’m very interested in what the government is going to do,” Saxe tells me.

    She warns that by suddenly tearing down the architecture of a cap-and-trade system that took years to build up, Ontario is leaving itself exposed to unforeseen costs and potential litigation on all fronts. On both sides of the border.

    That’s because Ontario formally linked to carbon markets in Quebec and California, where Canadian and American companies bid at auction for emissions permits that were tradable — and valuable. For private companies that have bid nearly $3 billion at auction since last year for those permits, that’s a lot of money to lose by government fiat.

    While reluctant to make predictions, Saxe knows enough from decades of running her own law firm to worry about the consequences both environmental and legal.

    During his winning election campaign, Ford made a point of setting aside $30 million to fund a court battle with Ottawa over a federal law that mandates a minimum carbon tax to backstop any province that fails to impose a carbon price of its own.

    But beyond any federal-provincial litigation — legal experts believe Ottawa has an airtight case — it is the risk of private sector court fights that could bleed Ontario further.

    “Conceptually, I think there will be lawsuits,” Saxe says in our interview. Ontario’s Climate Act “was not designed for this kind of cancellation, but that will be for a judge to decide.”

    Moreover, California may prove to be fertile ground for lawsuits, because “U.S. courts have a tradition of imposing punitive damages.” There could also be class-action suits from companies that invested heavily on the basis of Ontario law.

    The PC government has also lost a revenue stream that would have allowed Ontario to fund a backlog of school repairs — while bankrolling other energy-saving initiatives in hospitals, homes, and private-sector pilot projects. Saxe points to energy-saving projects that would have boosted research and development across the province, belying Ford’s campaign claims of an imaginary “cap-and-trade carbon tax slush fund.”

    Cap and trade is a market mechanism that allows companies to manage reduced emissions in the most efficient way, while the government raises revenue to invest in emissions reductions. A carbon tax, by contrast, is a blunt instrument (no trade) that imposes a price on pollution, without necessarily lowering the overall emissions ceiling (no cap).

    “In terms of emissions reductions, cap and trade outperforms the ... carbon tax,” according to Saxe’s latest annual report. “Cap and trade has higher total GHG (greenhouse gas) reductions due to the declining cap, offsets ... and using revenues to fund low-carbon initiatives.”

    Thanks to Ford — and his self-proclaimed “Government for the People” — the province will likely end up with a carbon tax that is less efficient for the private sector, and more expensive for the people. In addition to the legal costs, opportunity costs, and environmental costs, Ford has also raised the cost of doing business by trading a flexible cap-and-trade system for a rigid carbon tax backstop.

    As the province’s environmental watchdog since 2015, Saxe has tried hard to explain the realities and complexities of climate change. But the political environment has changed in Ontario since she took on her oversight role.

    Watching Ford’s firing spree at the mid-point of her five-year term, Saxe insists she isn’t going anywhere. But the province she serves is slowly going backwards into the environmental future.
     
  2. Littlecesar

    Littlecesar 知名会员 ID:83061

    注册:
    2008-09-17
    帖子:
    259
    支持:
    34
    声望:
    138
    金钱:
    $17,195
    多备些手电筒和腊烛吧,那些人不会这么干休的。以后停电事故会大增的,罢工停电也免不了的。
     
  3. ccc

    ccc 难得糊涂 ID:6614 管理成员 VIP

    注册:
    2003-04-13
    帖子:
    200,926
    支持:
    29,870
    声望:
    1,393
    金钱:
    $62,023
    那些人不是都被请走了么? 
     
  4. New Person

    New Person 资深人士 ID:11416

    注册:
    2003-08-26
    帖子:
    3,824
    支持:
    864
    声望:
    223
    金钱:
    $79,918
    很好啊。换一批人上来捞。反正没CFCER的份
     
  5. uglyducking

    uglyducking 不与傻瓜论短长 ID:13040 VIP

    注册:
    2003-09-30
    帖子:
    64,585
    支持:
    19,519
    声望:
    1,373
    金钱:
    $48,070
    裸鸡潜游:(
     
  6. ccc

    ccc 难得糊涂 ID:6614 管理成员 VIP

    注册:
    2003-04-13
    帖子:
    200,926
    支持:
    29,870
    声望:
    1,393
    金钱:
    $62,023
    换上二流、三流的上来捞。:D
     
  7. New Person

    New Person 资深人士 ID:11416

    注册:
    2003-08-26
    帖子:
    3,824
    支持:
    864
    声望:
    223
    金钱:
    $79,918
    换一批人上来也未必能让电网更加安全。按照保守党的省钱作风,若减少对电网基础的改造和更新,电网只会更不安全。Pickering核电站已经超期服务。FORD也已经许诺再让其运行到2024年。
     
  8. 小地主

    小地主 Climb The Mountain ID:4415 VIP

    注册:
    2003-01-07
    帖子:
    8,569
    支持:
    3,024
    声望:
    373
    金钱:
    $54,407
    Hydro One这个CEO可不好干。。看看福特有没有本事用二三流的工资请一个一流的人才。。
     
  9. Jingle

    Jingle 本站元老 ID:17741 VIP

    注册:
    2004-01-06
    帖子:
    11,165
    支持:
    4,064
    声望:
    373
    金钱:
    $109,155
    你没好好听新闻,这个没有了。
     
  10. 向问天

    向问天 日月神教光明左使 ID:112302 VIP

    注册:
    2012-09-04
    帖子:
    41,283
    支持:
    7,914
    声望:
    273
    金钱:
    $39,225

    难点在哪?
     
  11. 向问天

    向问天 日月神教光明左使 ID:112302 VIP

    注册:
    2012-09-04
    帖子:
    41,283
    支持:
    7,914
    声望:
    273
    金钱:
    $39,225

    基础设施的改造只会加强,因为不用付高工资给CEO了。
     
    已获得Adenine的支持。
  12. New Person

    New Person 资深人士 ID:11416

    注册:
    2003-08-26
    帖子:
    3,824
    支持:
    864
    声望:
    223
    金钱:
    $79,918
    我看在于如何在政治和电网之间走钢丝。
     
  13. New Person

    New Person 资深人士 ID:11416

    注册:
    2003-08-26
    帖子:
    3,824
    支持:
    864
    声望:
    223
    金钱:
    $79,918
    是不用付高工资给CEO了。但这点工资基础设施的改造就是九牛一毛。不知能换多少根电线杆子。
     
  14. Jay Wang

    Jay Wang 薄皮大馅 ID:80963 VIP

    注册:
    2008-05-09
    帖子:
    17,247
    支持:
    2,973
    声望:
    373
    金钱:
    $261,826
    我看福胖应该逼这些人裸退,那才大快人心!
     
  15. 向问天

    向问天 日月神教光明左使 ID:112302 VIP

    注册:
    2012-09-04
    帖子:
    41,283
    支持:
    7,914
    声望:
    273
    金钱:
    $39,225

    即使多换一根电线杆,也是加强,而不是减弱。
     
    已获得tt8966busyaround的支持。

分享此页面

扫描下面的二维码分享到微信!
http://bbs.comefromchina.com/threads/1640088/page-2