关于难民的facts
- 主题发起人 koppie644
- 开始时间
Of the finalized IRB decisions on people who crossed between ports of entry last year and early this year, 47 per cent were accepted, 36 per cent of claims were rejected (some of whom may appeal the decision) and the rest withdrawn or abandoned. (For context, of these claims, there were 3,462 finalized cases between January, 2017, and March, 2018, and 20,116 claims still pending.)
Legal experts say Canada’s immigration laws are clear: “They’re not illegal border crossers,” said James Hathaway, founding director of the University of Michigan’s program in refugee and asylum law, who is Canadian, and a leading global authority on refugee law.
Internationally, Canada is signatory to the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Within Canada, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is the legislation that governs the flow of people – i.e., non-citizens who enter Canada. The legislation that governs the flow of goods into Canada is the Customs Act, which applies to everyone, citizens and non-citizens.
Article 31 of the UN refugee convention says receiving countries may not penalize refugees for how they enter a country, as long as they present themselves “without delay” to authorities and show “good cause” for their presence.
In line with international practice, Canadian law under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Section 133, says that someone who has claimed refugee protection, and is either waiting for a hearing or has been accepted as a refugee, can’t be charged under the IRPA with an offence over how they came to Canada.
Illegal entry is not an offence in Canada’s Criminal Code. But the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations 27 (2) says anyone who does not enter at a port of entry must check in “without delay” at a border point.
Many of Ontario’s new arrivals came via the U.S.-Quebec border, crossing at places other than a designated port of entry. If they promptly go to, or are taken to, a port of entry after they arrive, they have not breached immigration law, said Audrey Macklin, a professor and chair in human-rights law and director of the Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies at the University of Toronto. In any case, if they file a refugee claim after they arrive, and are recognized as refugees, the manner by which they entered Canada doesn’t legally matter.
Internationally, Canada is signatory to the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Within Canada, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) is the legislation that governs the flow of people – i.e., non-citizens who enter Canada. The legislation that governs the flow of goods into Canada is the Customs Act, which applies to everyone, citizens and non-citizens.
Article 31 of the UN refugee convention says receiving countries may not penalize refugees for how they enter a country, as long as they present themselves “without delay” to authorities and show “good cause” for their presence.
In line with international practice, Canadian law under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Section 133, says that someone who has claimed refugee protection, and is either waiting for a hearing or has been accepted as a refugee, can’t be charged under the IRPA with an offence over how they came to Canada.
Illegal entry is not an offence in Canada’s Criminal Code. But the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations 27 (2) says anyone who does not enter at a port of entry must check in “without delay” at a border point.
Many of Ontario’s new arrivals came via the U.S.-Quebec border, crossing at places other than a designated port of entry. If they promptly go to, or are taken to, a port of entry after they arrive, they have not breached immigration law, said Audrey Macklin, a professor and chair in human-rights law and director of the Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies at the University of Toronto. In any case, if they file a refugee claim after they arrive, and are recognized as refugees, the manner by which they entered Canada doesn’t legally matter.
A Special Day
高级会员
- 注册
- 2016-03-01
- 消息
- 1,319
- 荣誉分数
- 424
- 声望点数
- 93
这个要支持。
实在看够了那些政客们的口水仗。法律专家的说法很清楚，如果过境后申请难民，就是寻求庇护者，如果不申请，就是非法入境。没有什么非法难民之说。当然，一定有人会说，不要拿法律当挡箭牌。
busyaround
资深人士
- 注册
- 2004-11-09
- 消息
- 563
- 荣誉分数
- 132
- 声望点数
- 203
Justin Trudeau is losing the argument on border crossings, poll suggests
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/angus-reid-border-poll-1.4771961
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/angus-reid-border-poll-1.4771961
这种狗屎左棍的文章值得看吗？写出来就是误导公众欺骗屁民。
根据法律，这些人就是非法跨越边境，他们根本没有资格在加拿大申请难民。
法律的名字叫： Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement
政府官网链接： https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio.../agreements/safe-third-country-agreement.html
土豆这个吸毒的戏剧老师根本就是视法律为狗屁，你不是不可以收这些跨越美加边境的，应该先修改法律废掉Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement，那我们也无话可说。
当然，左屎左棍都是蒙面上街游行，随时打砸抢，law and order他们根本就不想遵守。
你这是强词夺理，这是美加两国签字并执行的国际条约，不是加拿大自己的国内法律，不叫agreement难道叫law？
反正左棍们都是搅屎棍，我就是闲着多余搭理你们。
相关推荐
