How European leaders are responding to Trump's Gaza plan
From CNN Staff
Outside the Middle East, world leaders are scrambling to respond to US President Donald Trump’s proposed plan that the US should take over Gaza.
Here’s how some have responded:
• France: The country “reiterates its opposition to any forced displacement” of Palestinians, a spokesperson for the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs said. The spokesperson warned that any forced displacement would constitute a “serious violation of international law, an attack on the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians” and prove a “major obstacle to the two-state solution.”
• Germany: Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock rejected the US plan, saying that Gaza “just like the West Bank and East Jerusalem — belongs to the Palestinians.” Baerbock said Wednesday the “expulsion of the Palestinian civilian population from Gaza would not only be unacceptable and contrary to international law, it would also lead to new suffering and new hatred.”
• Spain: “I want to be very clear on this: Gaza is the land of Gazan Palestinians and they must stay in Gaza,” Reuters quoted Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares Bueno as saying Wednesday morning.
• UK: Foreign Minister David Lammy said that “Donald Trump is right” that Gaza has been destroyed and is “lying in rubble,” Reuters reported. But, he added the UK has “always been clear in our belief that we must seek two states. Separately, the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he believed the ceasefire needed to be sustained and Palestinians “must be allowed home. They must be allowed to rebuild and we should be with them in that rebuild on the way to a two state solution,” speaking in the House of Commons on Wednesday.
This post has been updated with the latest comments from some European leaders.
Grok2:
根据当前的网络信息和在X平台上发现的帖子，多个阿拉伯国家和一些国际组织已经明确表示反对美国的加沙计划。以下是部分反对美国加沙计划的国家和组织：
• 埃及
• 约旦
• 沙特阿拉伯
• 卡塔尔
• 阿联酋
• 巴勒斯坦权力机构
• 阿拉伯联盟
这些国家和组织在联合声明中表达了对任何试图将巴勒斯坦人从加沙或约旦河西岸驱逐的计划的坚决反对，指出这种行动会威胁地区稳定、扩大冲突并破坏和平前景。
此外，俄罗斯也公开批评了特朗普提出的“接管”加沙的计划，称其为鲁莽，并支持两国解决方案。
请注意，这些反应反映了在特定时间点上的政治立场，实际的国际支持或反对可能随时间和政治动态变化而不同。
